The Effect of On-line Hemodiafiltratrion on Nutritional Status and Body Composition

June 16, 2017 updated by: Pablo Molina

The Effect of On-line Hemodiafiltratrion on Nutritional Status and Body Composition: A Prospective, Controlled, Pilot Study

Compared to conventional hemodialysis (HD), on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) achieves a more efficient removal of uremic toxins and reduces inflammation, which could favourably affect nutritional status. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 1-year effect of OL-HDF on nutritional status and body composition in prevalent HD patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Postdilution on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) is considered the most efficient renal replacement treatment modality. Compared with conventional hemodialysis (HD), OL-HDF enables a better removal of middle molecular weight uremic toxins by combining convective and diffusive clearance. Although higher convection volume exchange has been associated with an increased survival advantage for dialysis patients, the mechanisms by which OL-HDF may improve outcomes remain unknown.

On the basis of improved toxin removal, a potential benefit of OL-HDF on nutritional status has been postulated. However, evidence on the effect of OL-HDF on nutritional status is scarce and at times conflicting. Some observational and interventional studies have suggested that OL-HDF is associated with improved nutritional parameters; others have found no effect; and one study even reported negative effects of OL-HDF on nutritional status. The majority of these observations come from cohort studies, non-controlled interventions and/or secondary analysis of controlled trials. Further, there are currently no data examining the plausible effect of postdilution OL-HDF on body composition. To clarify this important knowledge gap, this prospective, controlled, study evaluated the effects of high volume postdilution OL-HDF on nutritional status and body composition in prevalent HD patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
33

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • being over 18 yr old; receiving stable high-flux hemodialysis treatment for at least 3 mo (Kt/Vurea ≥1.2 and hemodialysis performed 3.0 to 6.0 h, three times weekly), and agreed to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • malabsorption syndrome; active malignant disease or other critical illnesses; or treated with steroids or antiandrogens.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: High-flux hemodialysis
3 times per week
Device: High-flux hemodialysis
Hemodialysis treatment thrice weekly with the high-flux FX-100 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany; membrane: Helixone®; surface: 2.2 m2; UF coefficient: 73 ml/h mm Hg; ß2-microglobulin-sieving coefficient: 0.8; albumin-sieving coefficient: 0.001), including a minimum target dialysis dose (Kt/Vurea) ≥1.2 and a session length of 3.0 to 6.0 h. Hemodialysis treatments were performed with the 5008 hemodialysis system (Fresenius Medical Care).
Experimental: On line-hemodiafiltration
3 times per week
Device: On line-hemodiafiltration
Post-dilution on line-hemodiafiltration treatment thrice weekly with the high-flux FX-100 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany; membrane: Helixone®; surface: 2.2 m2; UF coefficient: 73 ml/h mm Hg; ß2-microglobulin-sieving coefficient: 0.8; albumin-sieving coefficient: 0.001), including a minimum target dialysis dose (Kt/Vurea) ≥1.2 and a session length of 3.0 to 6.0 h. Post-dilution on line-hemodiafiltration treatments were performed with the 5008 hemodialysis system (Fresenius Medical Care), with automatic adjustment of the substitution fluid flow rate for maximising substitution volume while simultaneously avoiding haemoconcentration and filter clotting.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lean tissue mass in kilograms
Time Frame: Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.
Change from baseline to end of study in lean tissue mass in kilograms, measured quarterly throughout the 12-month intervention. Lean tissue mass was assessed by multi-frequency bioimpedance spectroscopy (Fresenius Medical Care) by experienced research staff blinded to all clinical and biochemical data of the patients. In order to control for potential variability and the effect of overhydration, all bioimpedance analyses were performed before a mid-week dialysis session.
Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.
Intracellular water in liters
Time Frame: Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.
Change from baseline to end of study in intracellular water in liters, measured quarterly throughout the 12-month intervention. Intracellular water was assessed by multi-frequency bioimpedance spectroscopy (Fresenius Medical Care) by experienced research staff blinded to all clinical and biochemical data of the patients. In order to control for potential variability and the effect of overhydration, all bioimpedance analyses were performed before a mid-week dialysis session.
Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.
Body cell mass in kilograms
Time Frame: Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.
Change from baseline to end of study in body cell mass in kilograms, measured quarterly throughout the 12-month intervention. Body cell mass was assessed by multi-frequency bioimpedance spectroscopy (Fresenius Medical Care) by experienced research staff blinded to all clinical and biochemical data of the patients. In order to control for potential variability and the effect of overhydration, all bioimpedance analyses were performed before a mid-week dialysis session.
Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum prealbumin levels in milligrams per deciliter
Time Frame: Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.
Change from baseline to end of study in serum prealbumin concentration in milligrams per decilitre, measured quarterly throughout the 12-month intervention. Pre-dialytic blood samples were collected after insertion of the access needle, and the post-dialytic sample was drawn from the arterial needle after slowing the blood punt to 50 ml/min. Prealbumin was determined by nephelometry with the IMMAGE800 Immunochemistry System (Beckman Coulter, Galway, Ireland).
Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pablo Molina

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Pablo Molina, MD, PhD, Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitari Dr Peset, Department of Medicine, Universitat de València, Spain

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 19, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 19, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 16, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • OL-HDF-63/16

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Chronic Dialysis

Clinical Trials on High-flux hemodialysis

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings