Comparison of Karyotyping, CMA and NIPT for Prenatal Diagnosing Chromosomal Anomalies
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Detailed Description
Aim: to compare the Karyotyping, CMA and NIPT for prenatal diagnosing chromosomal anomalies.
Design: diagnostic test Set: Prenatal diagnosis center of Taizhou City Study population: The Pregnant women who needed amniocenteses for prenatal genetic diagnosis were recruited.
Methods: amniotic fluid was regular examined by Karyotyping and CMA, and maternal peripheral blood was used for collected for NIPT detecting.
Statistic: CMA result as a golden standard, the main outcome is compared the diagnostic efficacy of NIPT for diagnosing chromosomal anomalies.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: YiYang Zhu, MD
- Phone Number: +8613819630569
- Email: zuyy@tzhospital.com
Study Locations
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Taizhou, Zhejiang, China, 317000
- Recruiting
- Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province
-
Contact:
- YiYang Zhu, MD
- Phone Number: +8613819630569
- Email: zuyy@tzhospital.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- pregnant women who needed amniocenteses were recruited during the study period, include high risk for serum screening, aged over 35 years and ultrasound abnormal.
- only singleton were included
Exclusion Criteria:
- women who met the contraindication for invasive procedure as : threaten abortion, acute infectious disease.
- Women who unfitted for NIPT analysis include multiple, history of allogeneic blood cell transfusion.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
accuracy of NIPT for prenatal diagnosing chromosomal anomalies
Time Frame: July,2016-July, 2017
|
sensitive, false negative rate, and false positive rate of NIPT compared with CMA
|
July,2016-July, 2017
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: YiYang Zhu, MD, prenatal doagnosis center of taizhou city
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- TZ201607
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Prenatal Diagnosis
-
NCT07515976Not yet recruitingPrenatal Diagnosis
-
NCT07610590RecruitingPrenatal Genetic Diagnosis
-
NCT06239077RecruitingGenetics | Prenatal Diagnosis
-
NCT04265352Completed
-
NCT04119349CompletedGenetic Counseling | Prenatal Diagnosis
-
NCT04584047CompletedPreimplantation Genetic Diagnosis | Prenatal Diagnoses
-
NCT02962830CompletedPrenatal Diagnosis
-
NCT07606989RecruitingFetal Diseases | Prenatal Diagnosis