Tissue-engineered Construct Based on Buccal Mucosa Cells and Matrix From Collagen and Polylactoglycolide Fibers

February 14, 2020 updated by: Denis Butnaru, MD, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

An Open Prospective Clinical Study on Safety and Efficacy of Surgical Treatment of Patients With Anterior Urethral Stricture Using a Tissue-engineered Construct Based on Autologous Buccal Mucosa Cells and Matrix From Reconstituted Collagen and Reinforcing Polylactoglycolide Fibers

This study investigates safety and efficacy of surgical treatment of patients with anterior urethral stricture using a tissue-engineered construct based on autologous buccal mucosa cells and matrix from reconstituted collagen and reinforcing polylactoglycolide fibers. This is a single arm study with no control. Success will be assessed via objective and subjective methods; complications will be tallied in a standardized fashion. Outcomes will be measured at five years.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Treatment of urethral strictures longer than 2 cm is an actual clinical challenge. In this case, the common method is replacement surgery using a buccal mucosa graft. However, the main disadvantage of this method is associated with limited donor resources and donor site morbidity.

The aim of this study is to assess safety and efficacy of surgical treatment of patients with anterior urethral stricture using a tissue-engineered construct. The construct consists of autologous buccal mucosa cells and matrix from reconstituted collagen and reinforcing polylactoglycolide fibers. Patients will be followed up for 5 years within this study. The follow-up regimen includes retrograde and pericatheter urethrography, voiding cystourethrography, uroflowmetry, biopsy, and quality of life monitoring. Telephone follow-up will take place in between these assessments.

The data obtained from this study will have practical implications for the urethral stricture treatment and will be based on the principles of evidence-based medicine.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
6

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient signed informed consent form
  • Diagnosed anterior urethral stricture longer than 2.0 cm and shorter than 4.0 cm
  • At least one prior internal optical urethrotomy and/or urethral bougienage

Non-inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute infectious diseases
  • Patient with decompensated heart and renal failure
  • Patient with non-compensated diabetes mellitus
  • Patient with malignant tumor
  • Patient with polyvalent allergy
  • Mental disorders
  • Post traumatic urethral strictures
  • Subtotal and total urethral strictures
  • Sexually transmitted infections
  • Hypersensitivity to any components of tissue-engineered constructs
  • Any clinical state which does not ensure the safe implementation of study procedure (investigator's view)
  • Other associated urethral strictures
  • Laboratory markers of active urethritis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's refusal from the further participation in trial
  • Confirmed syphilis, HIV, hepatitis B or C infections
  • Patient who cannot be regularly examined due to any circumstances

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Urethroplasty with a tissue-engineered construct
The investigators will take a sample of the buccal mucosa to isolate epithelial cells. Autologous cells will be seeded on a hybrid matrix. Urethroplasty with this tissue-engineered construct will be performed. This is a single arm study with no control. All patients will undergo the surgical operation.
Procedure: Urethroplasty with a tissue-engineered construct
The investigators will perform urethroplasty with the tissue-engineered construct - epithelial cells isolated from patient's buccal mucosa and seeded on a collagen-polylactoglycolide matrix.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serious adverse events
Time Frame: 4 weeks after surgery
Frequency, type and severity of serious adverse events (SAE)
4 weeks after surgery
Serious adverse reactions
Time Frame: 4 weeks after surgery
Frequency, type and severity of serious adverse reactions (SAR)
4 weeks after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retrograde urethrography
Time Frame: 5 years
Influence of the surgery on the urethral lumen
5 years
Voiding cystourethrography
Time Frame: 5 years
Full assessment of the urethral lumen after the surgery
5 years
Pericatheter urethrography
Time Frame: 4 weeks after surgery
Assessment of absence or presence of contrast medium leakage outside the urethra
4 weeks after surgery
Biopsy
Time Frame: 4 months after surgery
Control of anatomical urethral structure in the intervention place
4 months after surgery
Urodynamic changes via uroflowmetry - 1
Time Frame: 5 years
Influence of the surgery on urinary flow rate: maximum flow rate
5 years
Urodynamic changes via uroflowmetry - 2
Time Frame: 5 years
Influence of the surgery on urinary flow rate: average flow rate
5 years
Urodynamic changes via uroflowmetry - 3
Time Frame: 5 years
Influence of the surgery on urinary flow rate: total volume voided
5 years
Urodynamic changes via uroflowmetry - 4
Time Frame: 5 years
Influence of the surgery on urinary flow rate: maximum flow time
5 years
Quality of life monitoring - 1
Time Frame: 5 years
Quality of life estimated by validated questionnaires: Short Form (SF-36)
5 years
Quality of life monitoring - 2
Time Frame: 5 years
Quality of life estimated by validated questionnaires: International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS)
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Denis Butnaru, Dr., Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
  • Principal Investigator: Andrey Vinarov, Dr., Prof., Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 2, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 14, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SU-IRM-2017-0001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urethral Stricture

Clinical Trials on Urethroplasty with a tissue-engineered construct

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings