Comparison of Hydro-dissection Versus Ultrasonic Aspirator in Division of Liver Parenchyma in Laparoscopic Resection (LLS)

September 2, 2020 updated by: Ivan Kazakov, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center

Background: until now, there is no agreement about the safest and feasible method for liver parenchyma transection during laparoscopic liver resection.

Study design: prospective, randomized, single-center The purpose of the study: comparison of short-term results of two methods of parenchyma liver transection during laparoscopic liver resection

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
68

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Russian Federation
    • Entuziastov Shosse,86
      • Moscow, Entuziastov Shosse,86, Russian Federation, 111123
        • Moscow Clinical Scientific Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with benign lesions (hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia [FNH], hepatocellular adenoma, biliary cystadenoma, hydatid echinococcosis [only with total pericystectomy]) and malignant tumors (colorectal cancer metastases in the liver [CRLM], hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC], intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma, gallbladder cancer T1b-3NxMo without invasion into bile ducts and adjacent organs), which involves laparoscopic segmental or major resection of the liver.
  • Gender: both, male and female
  • Minimum age 18 years
  • Maximum age: 80 years
  • ASA physical status I-IV
  • BMI up to 40 kg/m2
  • No simultaneous extrahepatic intra-abdominal procedures (bile duct resection, colon resection, partial duodenum resection)
  • Total bilirubin up to 100mmol/l if jaundice presents in non-cirrhotic patients
  • If cirrhosis is present, class A and B according to CTP score

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Difficulty index > 12 points (see below)

    • Tumor invasion of IVC or portal trunk (necessity of vascular reconstruction)
    • Repeated liver resection before laparoscopic resection (the single resection before is not a contraindication)
    • Simultaneous extra-hepatic intra-abdominal procedures (bile duct resection, colon resection etc.)
    • Age under 18 years
    • Age above 80 years
    • ASA physical status >IV
    • BMI > 40 kg/m2
    • Total bilirubin >100mmol/l if jaundice presents in non-cirrhotic patients
    • If cirrhosis is present, class C according to CTP score
    • Persons who are incapable of giving consent
    • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
    • Patients enlisted in other studies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: ErbeJet
liver resection using a bipolar dissector (Erbe), ultracision harmonic scalpel (Ethicon) and water-jet dissector (ERBEJET 2).
Procedure: liver transection during laparoscopic liver resection
liver transection during laparoscopic liver resection
Experimental: Misonix
liver resection using a bipolar dissector (Erbe), ultracision harmonic scalpel (Ethicon), and ultrasonic aspirator (Misonix/SonaStar Ultrasonic Surgical Aspiration System)
Procedure: liver transection during laparoscopic liver resection
liver transection during laparoscopic liver resection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraoperative Blood Loss
Time Frame: 1 day
Absolute blood loss (ml) will be calculated as the amount of blood (collected only during the parenchyma resection) in suction the container after the subtraction of all irrigating fluids and weighing operative sponges.
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Аbsolute Measurement of Blood Loss in Relation to Resection Size (ml/cm^2)
Time Frame: 1 day
Аbsolute measurement of blood loss in relation to resection size (ml/cm^2).
1 day
Duration of Liver Parenchyma Transaction
Time Frame: 1 day
Duration of liver parenchyma transaction (min)
1 day
Necessity to Apply the Pringle Maneuver.
Time Frame: 1 day
the number of participants who needed to apply the Pringle maneuver
1 day
The Total Duration of Pringle Maneuver.
Time Frame: 1 day
The total duration of Pringle maneuver (min)
1 day
Hospital Stay (Day)
Time Frame: up to 1 month
Hospital stay (day)
up to 1 month

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morbidity
Time Frame: 30 days
Morbidity according to Clavien-Dindo classification (it is advisable to activate complications class II-V). The Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) is a standardized system for the registration of surgical complications. It consists of 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V). The major characteristic of the CDC system is that the severity of a complication is graded based on the type of therapy required to treat the complication. The CDC system has been validated and accepted worldwide for use in many fields of surgery. The complications that change the treatment of grade II-V.
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Mikhail Efanov, MD, PhD, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 20, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 3, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 2, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MCNC 01/2017

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Transection During Laparoscopic Liver Resection

Clinical Trials on liver transection during laparoscopic liver resection

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings