HepaT1ca: Quantifying Liver Health in Surgical Candidates for Liver Malignancies (Hepatica)

October 3, 2019 updated by: University of Edinburgh
This observational clinical cohort study aims to evaluate the clinical utility of LiverMultiScan in quantifying liver health prior to liver resection or TACE. The results will enable further developments in scanning protocols and software, and clearly define the relevance of applying this technology as part of the pre-operative assessment of the patient being considered for liver resection or TACE.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The liver is unique among the abdominal organs for the capacity to regenerate post-operatively. However, a minimum functional liver remnant (FLR) is required for patients to survive the initial perioperative period. At present, the assessment of the FLR is based on volume alone, in the context of clinical judgment and surrogate markers of liver function based on blood tests. Recently, Perspectum Diagnostics have developed and validated LiverMultiScan, an MRI-based technology that can non-invasively quantify fibroinflammatory disease in addition to steatosis and iron content. In this project, we plan to use LiverMultiScan as an additional direct measurement of liver health prior to resectional surgery or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), so that liver volume and function can be combined. For example, surgery with a predicted FLR of 21% might be survivable if the liver tissue was in extremely good health, whereas surgery with a predicted FLR of 40% might be lethal if the liver tissue was in poor health. Occasionally, portal vein embolization (PVE) is performed to promote hypertrophy of the FLR. Furthermore, non-resectional intervention, for example TACE for primary liver cancers, is well-tolerated by patients with healthy livers, but can lead to serious liver decompensation and liver failure if TACE is delivered to a liver in poor health. Currently, the available imaging modalities are limited in their ability to assess liver health in liver resection or TACE candidates. Liver fat content (steatosis) can be assessed with CT, or more accurately with MRI. However, fibroinflammatory disease, which has been shown to correlate with post-resection morbidity, typically requires an invasive biopsy to diagnose accurately.

This research project will support the definition, development and technical validation of Hepatica, which aims to build on the MRI technology underlying LiverMultiScan and develop the additional functionality required to meet this clinical need.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
149

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • Basingstoke, United Kingdom
        • Hampshire Hospitals Foundation Trust
      • Edinburgh, United Kingdom
        • NHS Lothian Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients being considered for liver resection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • i. Patients under the age of 18 years will be excluded from the present study. ii. Prisoners will be excluded from the present study. iii. Persons unable to have an MRI scan (including but not limited to claustrophobia, implanted metallic devices, metal foreign body) iv. Adults with incapacity v. Non-provision of consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Main cohort
Patients undergoing liver resection
Diagnostic test: Multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging
LiverMultiScan before and after surgery to assess liver health prior to liver resection and in the regenerative phase.
Other Names:
  • LiverMultiScan
Experimental: Nested cohort PVE
Patients undergoing liver resection after portal vein embolisation
Diagnostic test: Multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging
LiverMultiScan before and after surgery to assess liver health prior to liver resection and in the regenerative phase.
Other Names:
  • LiverMultiScan
Experimental: Nested cohort neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Patients undergoing liver resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Diagnostic test: Multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging
LiverMultiScan before and after surgery to assess liver health prior to liver resection and in the regenerative phase.
Other Names:
  • LiverMultiScan
Experimental: Nested cohort TACE
Patients undergoing trans arterial chemoembolisation for presumed hepatocellular carcinoma
Diagnostic test: Multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging
LiverMultiScan before and after surgery to assess liver health prior to liver resection and in the regenerative phase.
Other Names:
  • LiverMultiScan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between the pre-operative liver health assessment score and the post-operative liver function composite integer-based risk score.
Time Frame: 24 months
Correlation between the pre-operative liver health assessment score (Hepatica score - calculated by weighting future remnant liver volume by liver inflammation and fibrosis (LIF) score) and the post-operative liver function composite integer-based risk (Hyder-Pawlik) score.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare LiverMultiScan image interpretations with histological findings
Time Frame: 24 months
To compare LiverMultiScan image interpretations with clinical outcome after surgery in three domains: post-operative liver function, surgery-specific complication rate, and overall complication rate
24 months
• To evaluate LiverMultiScan image interpretations correlated with post-operative length of stay.
Time Frame: 24 months
• To compare LiverMultiScan image interpretations with histological findings in the resected liver specimen in four domains: fibrosis, inflammation, fat content and iron load as title
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Edinburgh

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Perspectum
Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Damian J Mole, MBChB PhD, University of Edinburgh

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 7, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 3, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AC17009
  • 223180 (Other Identifier: IRAS)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Controlled access of study data through a reasonable request to the study management team, after a reasonable embargo period after completion of the study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Clinical Trials on Multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings