Comparison Between Novel Flower-type Covered Stent and Conventional Covered Stent

July 9, 2017 updated by: Samsung Medical Center

Comparison Between Novel Flower-type Covered Stent and Conventional Covered Stent in Malignant Extrahepatic Biliary Obstruction: Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study

The aim of this animal study is determining the technical feasibility of the novel flower-type covered self-expandable metal stent (F-CSEMS) and investigating whether the novel flower-type covered self-expandable metal stent (F-CSEMS) could prevent cholecystitis and pancreatitis, comparing with conventional covered self-expandable metal stent (C-CSEMS).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Covered self-expandable metal stent (C-CSEMS) has the risk of obstruction of the cystic duct, and the main and branch pancreatic ducts due to strong radial force and covering material, which results in cholecystitis and pancreatitis.

A flower-type covered self-expandable metal stent (F-CSEMS) having a five-petal-shaped design with side grooves was constructed to prevent the obstruction of the cystic duct orifice.

This study investigated the value of the F-CSEMS in protection for cholecystitis and pancreatitis.

The investigators will enroll patients with distal MBO (Malignant Biliary Obstruction) who received placement at the Samsung Medical Center. Transpapillary flower-type covered self-expandable metal stent (F-CSEMS) placements will be included in this study.

The diagnosis of MBO will be based on imaging and/or pathological findings. Malignancy was proved by histopathological confirmation obtained by endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), bile duct biopsy (cytology), pancreatic duct cytology, or liver biopsy.

The investigators will evaluate the frequency of pancreatitis and cholecystitis.

Furthermore, the investigators will evaluate various parameters to clarify the predictive factors of pancreatitis and cholecystitis. The following 10 variables will be evaluated in pancreatitis by univariate analysis: [1] sex, [2] age, [3] primary disease, [4] Covered type (partially or fully), [5] SEMS with high AF, [6] F-CSEMS with high RF, [7] EST before F-CSEMS, [8] previous biliary stent, [9] contrast injection into the pancreatic duct (pancreatogram), and [10] the position of the distal stent edge.

The following 11 variables will be evaluated in cholecystitis by univariate analysis: [1] sex, [2] age, [3] regions of stricture, [4] F-CSEMS with high AF AF (axial force), [5] F-CSEMS with high RF, [6] previous biliary stent, [7] gallbladder stone, [8] contrast injection into the gallbladder (GB injection), [9] involvement to the orifice of the cystic duct (OCD), [10] position of distal stent edge, and [11] cystic duct occlusion by F-CSEMS.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

software: nQuery + nTerim (version 4.0)

- One-sided Chi-square test for proportion comparison

H0: p1=p2 vs H1: p1>p2 (The incidence of complications in the flower-type covered stent is smaller than in the conventional stent.)

p1 = incident rate of complication in full covered stent group p2 = incident rate of complication in flower-type covered stent group

  • Set p1(incident rate of complication in full covered stent group) = 15% = 0.15
  • expected % decrement in incidence rate = 40%, 50%, 60%, 70% --> p2 = 0.09, 0.075, 0.06, 0.045
  • Significance level (alpha) = 0.05
  • Maximum number of patients who can be enrolled = 10 per month at SMC = 120 per year

  • Expected enroll period = 1 year = 12 months

    1. Sample size calculation with targeted power of 80% Expected % decrement in incidence rate 70% p2 4.5% Required n per group 116 Required total sample size 232 Required enroll period (year) 1.9
    2. Power calculation with a total sample size of 232 (116 per group) Expected % decrement in incidence rate 40% 50% 60% 70% p2 9.0% 7.5% 6.0% 4.5% Expected power (%) 32 48 64 80
    3. Minimum % decrement to be detected with power of 80% Planned enroll period (year) 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Enroll-able n per group 60 90 120 150 180 Enroll-able total sample size 120 180 240 300 360 Minimum % decrement to be detected 93.33% 78.70% 68.70% 62.70% 58.00% Expected p2 1.0% 3.2% 4.7% 5.6% 6.3%

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
256

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults from 19 to 85 years of age who have voluntarily agreed to the clinical trial and signed a written agreement
  • Patients with malignant extrahepatic bile duct obstruction without surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who had already undergone surgical biliary drainage
  • Patients who previously underwent percutaneous spinal cholecystectomy (PTGBD)
  • Patients who underwent conventional metal-on-metal self-expandable metal stents (C-CSEMS)
  • Patients who underwent biliary plastic stent implantation for more than 15 days
  • Patients with malignant stricture of the intrahepatic bile duct and patients with stenosis within 2 cm of the liver
  • Patients whose expected life expectancy is less than 3 months
  • Pregnant patient
  • Patients who can not undergo endoscopic procedures based on the judgment of the researcher

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Flower-CSEMS
EGIS Flower Biliary Full Covered Stent(Flower-CSEMS), Bile Duct Stent, (S & G Biotech Co., Ltd.) will be inserted by using Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP).
Device: Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP)
This study is prospective randomized multicenter study by using Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP). Comparison between Novel flower-type covered stent and Conventional covered stent in malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction will be conducted after stent insertion by using Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP).
Experimental: Conventional-CSEMS
Conventional-CSEMS (S & G Biotech Co., Ltd.) will be inserted by using Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP).
Device: Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP)
This study is prospective randomized multicenter study by using Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP). Comparison between Novel flower-type covered stent and Conventional covered stent in malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction will be conducted after stent insertion by using Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pancreatitis, Cholecystitis - Occurrence rate : %
Time Frame: 3 months after procedure
The incidence of pancreatitis is calculated using percentiles.
3 months after procedure
Pancreatitis, Cholecystitis - Severity
Time Frame: 3 months after procedure
The extent of each side effect is described in the Adverse Reactions Report according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Rating System version 4.0.
3 months after procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stent-related adverse events
Time Frame: 6 months after procedure
Post -ERCP pancreatitis, Severity of pancreatitis, Bleeding, Microperforation
6 months after procedure
Stent patency
Time Frame: 6 months after procedure
We followed up the stent patency until the time of patient death or stent occlusion.
6 months after procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Samsung Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Jong Kyun Lee, MD PhD, Samsung Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 12, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 9, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 12, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 9, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2017-03-098-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Clinical Trials on Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings