rTMS for the Treatment of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease

April 22, 2021 updated by: Piu Chan, Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for the Treatment of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease

This study is a double blind comparative study examining the effectiveness of the rTMS treatment on Freezing of Gait (FOG) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The investigators hypothesize that treatment with rTMS on supplemental motor area will improve gait quality and decrease the frequency of FOG in PD patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Freezing of gait (FOG) is a common and debilitating symptom in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), characterized by sudden and brief episodes of inability to produce effective forward stepping. FOG is a major risk factor for falls, and greatly contributes to reduced mobility and quality of daily life. Treatment of FOG has been perceived as a very challenging task. Although various treatment approaches exist, including pharmacological and surgical options, evidence is inconclusive for many approaches and no clear treatment protocols are available until now.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a noninvasive neural modulation technique, has been closely applied as a treatment for various neurologic and psychiatric disorders. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that rTMS could improve motor symptoms for PD patients with a moderate effect size. To date, however, only few rTMS studies have focused on its efficacy on FOG in patients with parkinsonism, and most of them targeted the primary motor cortex or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex . Even though some evidence indicates the involvement of the SMA in FOG, no report has described the SMA rTMS in PD patients with FOG.

Moreover, few studies combined functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and rTMS to unravel the mechanism of its beneficial effects. To address these issues, the investigators conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study to explore the efficiency of SMA-rTMS on FOG in PD patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China, 100053
        • Xuanwu Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Idiopathic PD patients.
  • Presenting with FOG.
  • The mini-mental state examination questionnaire score above 24 points.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other neurological or psychiatric disorders.
  • History of epilepsy, seizures or convulsions.
  • Metal implantation.
  • History of exposure to rTMS in the past (to minimizing risk of unblinding sham condition).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: High-frequency rTMS
Patients randomized to this group will receive rTMS delivering over the supplementary motor area (SMA). Each treatment consists 1000 pulses (5-second burst of 10Hz rTMS, repeated 20 times at every minute ).Stimulus intensity is 90% of resting motor threshold. A figure-of-8 coil is connected to a biphasic magnetic stimulator, and the induced current is perpendicular to the midline.
Device: High-frequency rTMS
It is delivered at a 5-second burst of 10Hz stimuli, repeated 20 times at every minute. Each treatment contains a total of 1000 pulses. Stimulus intensity is 90% of resting motor threshold. The SMA stimulation will be given using a coil centered at points 3-cm anterior to the leg motor area in the sagittal midline.
Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS
Patients randomized to this group will receive the sham rTMS. The procedure is same as used in patients receiving experimental rTMS, except that the coil is angled 90° away.
Device: Sham rTMS
The procedure will be same as the high-frequency rTMS except that the coil is 90° angled away.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes of the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOGQ) Score
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, post-treatment 4 weeks
NFOGQ ranges from 0-24 points. It is used to quantify changes of the FOG frequency and severity. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Pre-treatment, post-treatment 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motor Subscale of the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS Part III)
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, post-treatment 4 weeks
The motor subscale of the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale evaluates the overall motor symptoms in PD, ranging from 0-112 points. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Pre-treatment, post-treatment 4 weeks
Cadence
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, post-treatment 4 weeks
To assess the changes of straight walking function.
Pre-treatment, post-treatment 4 weeks
Turning Duration
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, post-treatment 4 weeks
To assess the changes of turning function.
Pre-treatment, post-treatment 4 weeks
Changes of Brain Functional Connectivity.
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, post-treatment at 2 weeks
functional connectivity will be assessed using fMRI, which can help understand the neural mechanism of the rTMS treatment. Using the baseline scans, the imaging biomarkers for freezing of gait and Parkinson's disease were developed by contrasting the connectivity profiles of patients with freezing of gait to those without freezing of gait and normal controls, respectively. These two biomarkers were then interrogated to assess the rTMS effects on connectivity patterns.
Pre-treatment, post-treatment at 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Piu Chan, MD, PhD, Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 22, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Z171100000117013

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on High-frequency rTMS

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings