rTMS for the Treatment of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease

April 22, 2021 updated by: Piu Chan, Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for the Treatment of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease

This study is a double blind comparative study examining the effectiveness of the rTMS treatment on Freezing of Gait (FOG) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The investigators hypothesize that treatment with rTMS on supplemental motor area will improve gait quality and decrease the frequency of FOG in PD patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Freezing of gait (FOG) is a common and debilitating symptom in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), characterized by sudden and brief episodes of inability to produce effective forward stepping. FOG is a major risk factor for falls, and greatly contributes to reduced mobility and quality of daily life. Treatment of FOG has been perceived as a very challenging task. Although various treatment approaches exist, including pharmacological and surgical options, evidence is inconclusive for many approaches and no clear treatment protocols are available until now.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a noninvasive neural modulation technique, has been closely applied as a treatment for various neurologic and psychiatric disorders. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that rTMS could improve motor symptoms for PD patients with a moderate effect size. To date, however, only few rTMS studies have focused on its efficacy on FOG in patients with parkinsonism, and most of them targeted the primary motor cortex or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex . Even though some evidence indicates the involvement of the SMA in FOG, no report has described the SMA rTMS in PD patients with FOG.

Moreover, few studies combined functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and rTMS to unravel the mechanism of its beneficial effects. To address these issues, the investigators conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study to explore the efficiency of SMA-rTMS on FOG in PD patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100053
        • Xuanwu Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Idiopathic PD patients.
  • Presenting with FOG.
  • The mini-mental state examination questionnaire score above 24 points.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other neurological or psychiatric disorders.
  • History of epilepsy, seizures or convulsions.
  • Metal implantation.
  • History of exposure to rTMS in the past (to minimizing risk of unblinding sham condition).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High-frequency rTMS
Patients randomized to this group will receive rTMS delivering over the supplementary motor area (SMA). Each treatment consists 1000 pulses (5-second burst of 10Hz rTMS, repeated 20 times at every minute ).Stimulus intensity is 90% of resting motor threshold. A figure-of-8 coil is connected to a biphasic magnetic stimulator, and the induced current is perpendicular to the midline.
It is delivered at a 5-second burst of 10Hz stimuli, repeated 20 times at every minute. Each treatment contains a total of 1000 pulses. Stimulus intensity is 90% of resting motor threshold. The SMA stimulation will be given using a coil centered at points 3-cm anterior to the leg motor area in the sagittal midline.
Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS
Patients randomized to this group will receive the sham rTMS. The procedure is same as used in patients receiving experimental rTMS, except that the coil is angled 90° away.
The procedure will be same as the high-frequency rTMS except that the coil is 90° angled away.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes of the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOGQ) Score
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, post-treatment 4 weeks
NFOGQ ranges from 0-24 points. It is used to quantify changes of the FOG frequency and severity. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Pre-treatment, post-treatment 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motor Subscale of the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS Part III)
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, post-treatment 4 weeks
The motor subscale of the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale evaluates the overall motor symptoms in PD, ranging from 0-112 points. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Pre-treatment, post-treatment 4 weeks
Cadence
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, post-treatment 4 weeks
To assess the changes of straight walking function.
Pre-treatment, post-treatment 4 weeks
Turning Duration
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, post-treatment 4 weeks
To assess the changes of turning function.
Pre-treatment, post-treatment 4 weeks
Changes of Brain Functional Connectivity.
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, post-treatment at 2 weeks
functional connectivity will be assessed using fMRI, which can help understand the neural mechanism of the rTMS treatment. Using the baseline scans, the imaging biomarkers for freezing of gait and Parkinson's disease were developed by contrasting the connectivity profiles of patients with freezing of gait to those without freezing of gait and normal controls, respectively. These two biomarkers were then interrogated to assess the rTMS effects on connectivity patterns.
Pre-treatment, post-treatment at 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Piu Chan, MD, PhD, Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on High-frequency rTMS

3
Subscribe