Computer Guided Versus Free Hand Immediate Implant Placement
Patient Satisfaction and Early Implant Failure of Computer-guided Versus Free- Hand Immediate Implant Placement in Fresh Extraction Sockets in Esthetic Zone, a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
General operative procedures:
Eligible patients will be randomized, at the surgical phase in two groups, study group (in which computer guided implant placement was done using computer aided surgical guide) and comparative group (in which free hand implant placement was done).
Patients of both groups will be subjected to:
Careful clinical examination and medical and dental history taking. CBCT scan will be performed while patients biting on cotton roll to separate the teeth of interest from opposing dentition, moreover cotton rolls will be placed in vestibule for separation of lip and check from teeth of interest.After examination of the CBCT scan, maxillary and mandibular alginate impression will be made for eligible patients.For temporary crown fabrication after the surgery, the tooth or root to be extracted will be modified on the study cast and an artificial tooth will be placed. After that a 2mm hard vacuum sheet will be pressed on the study cast. For the test group (computer guided group), three dimensional (3d) virtual planning of the surgical guide and implant position will be made with the aid of Blue Sky ® implant planning software . After proper selection of implant size, diameter and position, the virtual surgical guide will be exported as a STL file for 3D printing. Before the surgery, adaptation of the surgical guide will be checked on the study cast and a metallic sleeve will be attached at proposed implant position using adhesive.
Intraoperative procedure:
3 days before the surgery, a prophylactic antibiotic will be given to the patient. On the day of surgery, local anaesthesia will be injected and a traumatic extraction of the remaining root or tooth will be performed. For a traumatic extraction, gentle application of a periotome mesio-distally along with slight rotational movement. After extraction, intact labial and palatal socket walls will be checked using periodontal probe for immediate implant placement. For the test group, the computer aided surgical guide will be checked for adaptability and any interference will be removed. After that implant drilling and placement will be performed using the surgical guide. For the control group, free hand implant drilling and placement will be performed guided by the extraction socket walls. For both groups implant primary stability will be checked by application of 35 Ncm2 force using torque wrench After that, the final abutment will be screwed in its position and the temporary crown will be made using the vacuum stent, where a chair side tooth coloured autopolymerizing resin will be injected into the vacuum stent at the proposed implant site. Finally, occlusion will be checked for any functional contact in maximum intercuspation and lateral movement. Any contact with the opposing should be removed and the patient will be instructed to avoid eating or incising on the temporary crown for at least two weeks. Seven days later patients will be recalled for inspection and taking postoperative photos, six months thereafter, the patient will receive a definitive crown.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt, 0000
- Safaa hussein
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with teeth or remaining roots in the esthetic zone and indicated for extraction and replacement with immediate implant.
Sufficient labial bone to avoid labial plate fracture during extraction (at least 1.5-2 mm). This will be confirmed by cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) scan.
Sufficient mesio distal length between the neighbouring natural teeth (at least 7 mm), this will be confirmed on the study cast.
Presence of adjacent teeth to the tooth or remaining root to be extracted.
Exclusion Criteria:
Heavy smokers (more than 2 packs / day). Patients with parafunctional habits (e.g. clenching or bruxism, etc.) Presence of acute infection in the tooth or the remaining root that will be extracted.
Severe overeruption of the opposing teeth to avoid premature contact with the temporary crown during the healing period.
Patients with poor oral hygiene Pregnant women Any systemic condition that may interfere with implant placement and its osseointegration (as uncontrolled diabetes, chemotherapy, radiotherapy. Osteonecrosis…)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Computer guided immediate implant placement
For the test group, the computer aided surgical guide will be used for implant drilling and placement.
|
Implant will be placed immediately using computer aided surgical guide
|
|
Active Comparator: Free hand immediate implant placement
For the control group, free hand implant drilling and placement will be performed guided by the extraction socket walls.
|
Implant will be placed immediately using computer aided surgical guide
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 0-6 months
|
Patient satisfaction will be assessed through a questionnaire and each question of the questionnaire will be scored by the patients on 10 cm visual analogue scales (VAS)
|
0-6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Early implant failure
Time Frame: 0-6 months
|
Early implant failure will be clinically diagnosed by implant loss from mouth which will be detected by visual inspection.
Early implant failure will be assessed in the interval between implant placement until functional loading (0-6 months).
|
0-6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, Sammartino G, Galindo-Moreno P, Trisi P, Steigmann M, Rebaudi A, Palti A, Pikos MA, Schwartz-Arad D, Choukroun J, Gutierrez-Perez JL, Marenzi G, Valavanis DK. Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent. 2008 Mar;17(1):5-15. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181676059.
- Schropp L, Isidor F, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A. Patient experience of, and satisfaction with, delayed-immediate vs. delayed single-tooth implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Aug;15(4):498-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01033.x.
- Sabir M, Alam MN. Survival of Implants in Immediate Extraction Sockets of Anterior Teeth: Early Clinical Results. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jun;9(6):ZC58-61. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13631.6123. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Faculty of Dentistry
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Dental Implants
-
NCT06682559Active, not recruitingDental Implants | Dental Implants, Single-tooth
-
NCT06786221Active, not recruitingDental Implantation | Dental Implants
-
NCT07073196Recruiting
-
NCT06799871Not yet recruitingDental Implants
-
NCT05644470Recruiting
-
NCT04960904Recruiting
-
NCT06527950Active, not recruitingDental Implants
-
NCT05722041Active, not recruitingDental Implants
-
NCT03572244Completed
Clinical Trials on Computer guided implant placement
-
NCT07523815RecruitingPartially Edentulous Mandible
-
NCT05750004Completed
-
NCT04590339CompletedPosterior Atrophic Mandible | Inferior Alveolar Nerve | Nerve Lateralization
-
NCT06925438CompletedDental Implants | Maxillary Diseases
-
NCT04344808UnknownDental Implants | Surgery, Computer-Assisted
-
NCT01905306UnknownBone-to-implant Contact | Success Rate | Survival Rate
-
NCT07008534Not yet recruiting
-
NCT06887582Active, not recruitingAlveolar Bone Loss | Maxillary Sinus Disease
-
NCT06417788RecruitingPartially Edentulous Patients | Bone Crest of at Least 10 mm Length and 6 mm Width | Patients of at Least 18 Years Old