Robotic-assisted Upper Extremity Training in Spinal Cord Injury Patients
Study design: Controlled Trial Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of robotic-assisted training of forearm and hand functions in spinal cord injury patients Setting: Ankara Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, Turkey Methods: Forty patients were allocated into robotic and control groups. Both groups received conventional rehabilitation program for four weeks. Moreover, robotic group received robotic rehabilitation program tailored to the patient five times a week (each session of 30 min).
Baseline data and post-intervention data was compared.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ankara, Turkey, 06100
- Ankara Fizik Tedavi ve REhabilitasyon Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
-
Ankara, Turkey, 06100
- Ankara Physical MEdicine and REhabilitation Trainign and Research Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ages between 18-50
- Cervical Level of Spinal Cord Injury
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe upper extremity contractures in the joints
- Intensive spasticity (Ashworth 3-4)
- Shoulder pain that causes exercise intolerance
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional Rehabilitation
Conventional rehabilitation program consisted range of motion (ROM) exercises, balance and coordination training, progressive resistive exercises, posture training, gait training, and occupational therapy as much as the patients tolerated.
Conventional rehabilitation was tailored to the patient considering his requires and expectancies.
|
Conventional rehabilitation program consisted range of motion (ROM) exercises, balance and coordination training, progressive resistive exercises, posture training, gait training, and occupational therapy as much as the patients tolerated.
Conventional rehabilitation was tailored to the patient considering his requires and expectancies.
|
|
Active Comparator: Robotic Rehabilitation + Conventional Rehab
The Armeo Spring HocomAG Inc. (Volketswil, Switzerland) device was used in robot assisted upper limb rehabilitation program.
A
|
Conventional rehabilitation program consisted range of motion (ROM) exercises, balance and coordination training, progressive resistive exercises, posture training, gait training, and occupational therapy as much as the patients tolerated.
Conventional rehabilitation was tailored to the patient considering his requires and expectancies.
The Armeo Spring HocomAG Inc. (Volketswil, Switzerland) device was used in robot assisted upper limb rehabilitation program.
Assistive component of the robotic arm was adjusted in accordance with motor level of each patient.
Variety and difficulty of games were chosen according to the ability and functional status of the patients.
Variety and difficulty level of the games were modified according to progress of patients by the same physiotherapist.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Independence Measure
Time Frame: Four weeks
|
Scale Evaluating the Functionality
|
Four weeks
|
|
Spinal Cord Independence Measure III
Time Frame: Four weeks
|
Scale Evaluating the Functionality and independence
|
Four weeks
|
|
Short Form-36
Time Frame: Four weeks
|
Scale Evaluation the activities of daily living
|
Four weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1240
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.