Effectiveness of Digital Rehabilitation (SIMPLI.REHAB) in Hand Arthritis

April 28, 2024 updated by: Eugénio Moita Gonçalves, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, E.P.E.

Effectiveness of Digital Rehabilitation (SIMPLI.REHAB) in Hand Arthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

This study investigates the effectiveness of SIMPLI.REHAB, a digital tool employed as an interface for administering occupational rehabilitation programs to patients diagnosed with Rheumatoid and Psoriatic Arthritis. Both of these conditions are inflammatory joint disorders capable of causing significant morphofunctional alterations in the hands, especially in their advanced stages. The introduction of digital technology emerges as a complementary tool when implementing rehabilitation programs.

Utilizing a prospective, longitudinal, single-blinded experimental study, 35 patients will be allocated into two groups: one receiving a complementary digital intervention through SIMPLI.REHAB and the other through a conventional rehabilitation program. Each group consists of six patients and the program spans seven weeks, focusing on therapeutic exercises, training in manual dexterity, and motor coordination, among other interventions, led by a Physiatrist.

The study intends to measure outcomes based on functionality scores, pain, disease activity, joint range, grip, pinch strength, and manual dexterity, both before and after each intervention, in order to ascertain the efficacy of integrating dynamic content through the digital tool SIMPLI.REHAB, as a supplementary resource in occupational rehabilitation programs. The potential limitations of the study include potential losses of follow-up and difficulties in assessing adherence to the digital tool precisely. Nonetheless, the digital tool aims to augment functional gains in rehabilitation programs by providing patients with accessible dynamic content of home-based strategies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis are inflammatory joint conditions that often affect the distal extremity of the upper limb responsible for manual functionality. If these conditions progress, they can lead to significant morphofunctional alterations. Occupational rehabilitation programs are essential for controlling and improving functional limitations. With the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, various technologies have emerged that allow the implementation of rehabilitation programs in distinct manners. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of an occupational rehabilitation program using the digital tool SIMPLI.REHAB as an interface for administering home-based strategies to patients diagnosed with rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis compared to a conventional rehabilitation program.

Using a prospective, longitudinal, single-blinded experimental study of superiority and randomized block design, 35 patients will be allocated to two intervention groups. An experimental intervention group will integrate an occupational rehabilitation program using the digital tool SIMPLI.REHAB for smartphones, compared to a group for a conventional rehabilitation program using a leaflet. Each group will consist of 6 patients and the program duration will be 7 weeks. This rehabilitation program, coordinated by a Physiatrist, includes classes for therapeutic exercises for flexibility and muscle strengthening, training in manual dexterity and motor coordination, thermotherapy, and patient education on joint protection principles conducted by the Occupational Therapy Team. The primary outcome to be assessed will be the functionality score with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. The surrogate endpoints will be pain (numerical pain scale), disease activity (DAS-28/DAPSA), joint range (digit-o-meter), grip and pinch strength (dynamometer), and assessment of manual dexterity (Moberg Pickup Test; 9-Hole Peg Test, and Kapandji's Pinches). The measurement of outcomes will be done before and after each intervention.

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of integrating a digital tool that provides dynamic content as a supplement to an occupational rehabilitation program, compared to the strategy traditionally used in patients with rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis with morphofunctional alterations in the hand. Certain study limitations may relate to losses of follow-up during the rehabilitation program period and difficulty in precisely assessing adherence to the digital tool. However, this tool will allow patients to access dynamic content of home-based strategies that will enhance the functional gains obtained in a rehabilitation program.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

" Must be referred patients from the Rheumatology Service of CHVNG/E. " Age 18 or older. " Must have a clinical diagnosis of either rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis by a Rheumatology specialist, as per the diagnostic criteria of the American College of Rheumatology.

" Must present pain, joint stiffness, joint instability, or osteoarticular deformities in the joints of the wrist, hand, and fingers.

" Must have a functional impact with a QuickDASH score > 31.5. " Must be capable of using the SIMPLI.REHAB app on a smartphone with internet connectivity.

" Must possess digital literacy allowing the use of the app. " Must have the ability to understand and provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

"Presence of other medical conditions that might interfere with participation or interpretation of results, such as: neoplasms, other systemic autoimmune diseases, diabetic polyneuropathy and/or uncontrolled diabetes " Having had local surgery on the joint of the wrist, hand, and fingers or a history of fracture in the last 6 months.

" History of intra-articular or intramuscular corticoanesthetic infiltration in the previous 4 weeks.

" Inability to perform hand exercises due to significant understanding, cognitive, or physical limitation.

" Participation in an occupational rehabilitation program during the study period or in the last 6 months.

" Severe hearing loss or visual impairment. " Undergoing other types of therapies or localized interventions in the hand and fingers during the study period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Digital Intervention Group
This group incorporates the SIMPLI.REHAB digital tool as a complementary strategy for a rehabilitation program, including flexibility exercises and muscle strengthening, manual dexterity and motor coordination training, thermotherapy, and education on joint protection principles.
Participants in this arm will undergo an in-person rehabilitation program coordinated by a Physiatrist and will be able to access home-based rehabilitation strategies through dynamic content provided by SIMPLI.REHAB digital tool.
Active Comparator: Conventional Intervention Group
This group follows a conventional rehabilitation program delivered in a more traditional, non-digital manner to serve as a comparison to assess the superiority of the experimental intervention using SIMPLI.REHAB digital tool.
Participants in this arm will undergo an in-person rehabilitation program coordinated by a Physiatrist and will be given home-based strategies in a printed paper brochure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score
Time Frame: Average of 7 weeks

Hand functionality in basic and instrumental daily life activities, occupational and artistic or sports activities, through the score in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) 30-item questionnaire, calculated before and after the intervention.

For each question, the patient rates on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score will range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (severe disability). It is a valid and reliable questionnaire (Pearson r > 0.70; ICC(2,1) = 0.96), with a minimal clinically important difference ranging between 10.83 and 15. (33, 37, 38).

Average of 7 weeks
QuickDASH Outcome Measure
Time Frame: Average of 7 weeks
Shortened version of the DASH questionnaire which includes 11 items for clinical and functional evaluation of the upper limb. The QuickDASH questionnaire assesses an individual's ability to complete daily life activities, the ability to bear load, as well as the intensity of symptoms. It is also a valid and reliable questionnaire (Pearson r > 0.70; ICC(2,1) = 0.90), with the minimal clinically important difference ranging between 15.91 and 20.
Average of 7 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants with New Osteoarticular Deformities
Time Frame: Average of 7 weeks
Classification of osteoarticular deformities
Average of 7 weeks
Rate of Rescue Medications Usage
Time Frame: Average of 7 weeks
Proportion of Pain-relief medications used
Average of 7 weeks
Number of Participants with Assistive Devices
Time Frame: Average of 7 weeks
Determine the use of assistive devices and/or orthosis
Average of 7 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Pain Scale
Time Frame: Average of 7 weeks
Score on the Numeric Pain Scale pre and post-intervention The Numeric Pain Scale is a unidimensional measurement instrument for pain intensity, frequently used in rheumatic diseases. The reliability of this scale is high (r = 0.96 to 0.95) with also high validity (r = 0.86 to 0.95). The minimal clinically significant difference is estimated at 1.1 points in patients with arthritis. (30, 31
Average of 7 weeks
Range of Motion
Time Frame: Average of 7 weeks
Joint range of motion using a digit-o-meter pre and post-intervention
Average of 7 weeks
Muscular Strength
Time Frame: Average of 7 weeks

Measurement of muscular strength using a pinch and palmar grip dynamometer pre and post-intervention.

Dynamometry for objective assessment of pinch and palmar grip strength will allow for the evaluation of muscle strength in the hand and fingers.

The minimal clinically important difference is estimated to be between 5 to 6 kgs.

Average of 7 weeks
Moberg Pickup Test Score
Time Frame: Average of 7 weeks
Tool for objective assessment of manual dexterity and fine motor coordination pre and post-intervention.
Average of 7 weeks
9-Hole Peg Test Score
Time Frame: Average of 7 weeks
Tool for objective assessment of manual dexterity and fine motor coordination pre and post-intervention.
Average of 7 weeks
Kapandji score
Time Frame: Average of 7 weeks
Tool for objective assessment of manual dexterity and fine motor coordination pre and post-intervention.
Average of 7 weeks
Disease Activity Index for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (DAS-28)
Time Frame: Average of 7 weeks

Score on Disease Activity Index pre and post-intervention for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.

The DAS-28, or Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, is a measure commonly used to assess disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. It evaluates the number of swollen and tender joints out of a total of 28, the patient's global assessment of their health, and an acute phase reactant (usually the erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein level). The DAS-28 provides a score that falls into one of the following categories to represent the patient's disease activity:Remission: DAS-28 < 2.6; Low disease activity: DAS-28 between 2.6 and 3.2; Moderate disease activity: DAS-28 between 3.2 and 5.1; High disease activity: DAS-28 > 5.1

Average of 7 weeks
Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis Patients (DAPSA)
Time Frame: Average of 7 weeks

Score on Disease Activity Index pre and post-intervention for Psoriatic Arthritis Patients.

DAPSA stands for Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis. It is a tool used to assess disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis. The score is calculated by summing the scores of the number of tender joints (68 joints are assessed), the number of swollen joints (66 joints are assessed), patient's assessment of pain, the patient's global disease activity and C-reactive protein (CRP) level (mg/dl). Low disease activity if DAPSA ≤ 15, moderate disease activity if DAPSA > 15 and ≤ 28 and, finally, high disease activity if DAPSA > 28.

Average of 7 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eugénio M Gonçalves, MD, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, E.P.E.
  • Study Director: Ana M Campolargo, MD, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, E.P.E.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Clinical Trials on Digital Rehabilitation

Subscribe