Innovative Approaches for Minor Consent: Consent 2.0
Innovative Approaches for Minor Consent: Consent 2.0 - A Multi-Center Study of the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions (ATN)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Potential participants will be recruited from clinical settings and HIV testing centers. If interested in participation, they will take a short Computer Assisted Self-Interview (CASI) screening survey to determine eligibility. Those eligible will take part in the one-day study visit at that time or will provide contact information to set up the study visit at a later date.
All study participants will attend a one-day study visit at their respective study site. Upon arrival, participants will complete a CASI that collects demographic, social, behavioral, and attitudinal measures. Next, participants will take part in a simulated consent process for two hypothetical trials modeled after ATN 113 and HPTN 077. Study procedures differ for adolescents and parents, so each group is described separately below:
Adolescent Participants: For each hypothetical trial, research staff will lead the participant through a simulated consent process consistent with their randomized consent condition. Then, the participant will complete a CASI assessing Willingness to Participate (WTP) and will work with research staff to complete the University of San Diego (UCSD) Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC).
Parent Participants: For each hypothetical trial, research staff will review the informed consent forms with the parent. The parent will complete a CASI with three vignettes that describe each of the three possible consent conditions. Parents will rate the acceptability of each vignette. Then, the participant will work with research staff to complete the UCSD Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC). Finally, the participant will answer a series of questions via CASI.
A subset of 6-8 adolescents and 6-8 parents per study site will complete a debriefing interview assessing adolescent and parent perspectives on the various consent conditions in greater depth, and to better understand the role of study features, family, and adolescent characteristics in willingness to participate/willingness to support the hypothetical research studies.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- Children's Hospital Colorado/Univ of Colorado SOM
-
-
Florida
-
Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
- University of South Florida
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
- University of Chicago
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
- Johns Hopkins University/SOM
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Note: Age limits apply to adolescent participants and to the adolescent children of parent participants.
Adolescent Inclusion Criteria
- Age 14-17 inclusive
- Able to read and speak English
- HIV status is negative or unknown
- Engaged in high-risk sexual activity in the last six months
Adolescent Exclusion Criteria
- Child of a parent already enrolled in the study
Parent Inclusion Criteria
- Able to read and speak English
- Parent or guardian of an adolescent who is between ages 14-17
- The parent/guardian's adolescent's HIV status is either negative or unknown
Parent Exclusion Criteria
- Parent of a child already enrolled in the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Adolescents: Consent Condition 1
Autonomous minor consent
|
Consent requirement where the participant is not required to get anyone's permission to participate in the trial.
|
|
Active Comparator: Adolescents: Consent Condition 2
Adult permission required
|
Consent requirement where the participant is required to obtain an adult's permission to participate in the trial.
|
|
Active Comparator: Adolescents: Consent Condition 3
Parental permission required
|
Consent requirement where the participant is required to obtain their parent's permission to participate in the trial.
|
|
Active Comparator: Parents: Consent Conditions 1-3
Autonomous minor consent, adult permission required, and parental permission required
|
Consent requirement where the participant is not required to get anyone's permission to participate in the trial.
Consent requirement where the participant is required to obtain an adult's permission to participate in the trial.
Consent requirement where the participant is required to obtain their parent's permission to participate in the trial.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Adolescent WTP Scores
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Comparing mean adolescent Willingness to Participate (WTP) scores across the three consent conditions and two trial types. WTP scores are based on the response to the question: "If offered the chance, how likely would you be to participate in the study?" Responses are collected using a Likert scale (definitely not participate, probably not participate, might or might not participate, probably participate, definitely participate) and converted to a numeric score with values ranging from 1 (definitely not participate) to 5 (definitely participate) for analysis. |
Day 1
|
|
Mean Parent WTS Scores
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Comparing mean parent Willingness to Support (WTS) scores across the three consent conditions and two trial types. WTS scores are based on the response to the question: "This is an acceptable approach to consent for your teenager's participation in the study." Responses are collected using a Likert scale (strongly disagree, disagree, neither disagree nor agree, agree, strongly agree) and converted to a numeric score with values ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) for analysis. |
Day 1
|
|
Effects of the Study Agent (Stage of Development and Method of Delivery) on High-risk Minor Adolescents' WTP Scores
Time Frame: Day 1
|
This data reflects adolescent Willingness to Participate (WTP) scores by study agent/trial type.
After review of hypothetical consent documents for 2 study agents in different stages of development and with different methods of delivery (based on real-world studies ATN 113 and HPTN 077), adolescents are asked "If offered the chance, how likely would you be to participate in the study?"
Responses are collected using a Likert scale (definitely not participate, probably not participate, might or might not participate, probably participate, definitely participate) and converted to a numeric score with values ranging from 1 (definitely not participate) to 5 (definitely participate) for analysis.
|
Day 1
|
|
Effects of the Study Agent (Stage of Development and Method of Delivery) on Parents' Acceptability Scores
Time Frame: Day 1
|
After review of hypothetical consent documents for 2 study agents in different stages of development and with different methods of delivery (based on real-world trials ATN 113 and HPTN 077), parents are presented with vignettes for the 3 different consent conditions (autonomous minor consent, adult permission required, parental permission required) and asked "How acceptable is this approach to research consent?".
Responses are collected on a Likert scale (completely unacceptable, unacceptable, neither unacceptable not acceptable, acceptable, completely acceptable) and converted to a numeric score with values ranging from 1 (definitely not acceptable) to 5 (definitely acceptable) for analysis.
|
Day 1
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amy Knopf, PhD, MPH, RN, Indiana University School of Medicine
- Study Director: Matthew Psioda, PhD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 17-0538
- 5U24HD089880-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on HIV
-
NCT07218211RecruitingHIV Prevention | HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis | HIV Prevention Program | HIV Prevention and Care | HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use
-
NCT07618507Completed
-
NCT05384145RecruitingHIV | HIV Testing | HIV Linkage to Care | HIV Treatment
-
NCT07509827RecruitingHIV Prevention | PrEP Adherence | HIV Related Stigma
-
NCT07231640RecruitingPrEP | HIV | HIV Prevention | PrEP Uptake
-
NCT07656077Not yet recruitingAntiretroviral Therapy | HIV-1 Infection | HIV Reservoir
-
NCT07194902RecruitingFeasibility | HIV Prevention | PrEP Uptake | Acceptability | HIV Self-testing | Male Partners of HIV-negative Postpartum Women
-
NCT02570334UnknownHIV | HIV-uninfected Children | Children Exposed to HIV
-
NCT01494961CompletedPartner HIV Testing | Couple HIV Counseling | Couple Communication | HIV Incidence
-
NCT07226492RecruitingPregnancy | HIV | Post-partum | HIV Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Adherence
Clinical Trials on Autonomous minor consent
-
NCT07368829RecruitingBronchoscopy | Lung Nodules | Localization Efficiency
-
NCT01851031CompletedFracture of Condylar Process
-
NCT05493189RecruitingCardiopulmonary Resuscitation
-
NCT05247333CompletedHyperhidrosis | Burns | Musculoskeletal Pain | Vomiting | Sleep Disorder | Constipation | Diarrhea | Cough | Dermatitis | Soft Tissue Injuries
-
NCT02138227Completed
-
NCT03548181UnknownFeasibility & Effect of a Tele-rehabilitation Program in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) (3-IPF)Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-
NCT05213741Not yet recruitingColorectal Cancer | Colonoscopy
-
NCT05081505Completed
-
NCT05240339CompletedParkinson Disease | Hallucinations | Parkinson Disease Psychosis | Delusion