Antibiotics Usage in Pediatric Orthopaedic Percutaneous Surgery (APOPS)

July 16, 2024 updated by: Sumit Gupta
The aim of this study is to determine if antibiotics affect the outcome after percutaneous surgery for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. The patient population will be recruited from the cohort presenting to Women and Children's Hospital for percutaneous fixation of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures who meet the eligibility criteria and consent to taking part in the study. Patients will be followed up for 3-6 weeks depending on age, and will be evaluated on the presence or absence superficial or deep infection, Visual Analog Scale pain scores, time to healing, need for repeat casting, and loss of fixation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This patient population will be recruited from the cohort presenting to Women and Children's Hospital for percutaneous fixation of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. Participants will be asked to assent to take part in the study and their parents or guardian will be asked to sign an informed consent. Patients will be randomized to a treatment group that receives one dose of pre-operative antibiotics or one that does not. Patients randomized to preoperative antibiotics will receive 25mg/kg cefazolin IV up to 1g or clindamycin 10mg/kg up to 600mg IV in cases of documented allergy to cefazolin. Patients randomized to the no-antibiotic group will receive a saline placebo. The resident, anesthesiologist, circulating nurse and other operating room staff will be instructed to not reveal the patient's randomization to the attending physician so as not to interfere with blinding.

The patient will then undergo closed reduction percutaneous pinning of supracondylar humerus fracture. Final AP and lateral fluoroscopic images in the case will be taken. The patient will be discharged from the hospital when pain is controlled with standard oral pain medications and all goals of inpatient management have been achieved. No patients will receive post-operative antibiotics regardless of randomization group as is the existing standard of care. Patients will be scheduled to follow up in 3-6 weeks depending on age. At that time the cast will be removed and AP and lateral radiographs will be used to assess healing. The pins will be removed in clinic and a soft dressing applied to the elbow region.

In cases of excessive pain or cast loosening the patient may be seen in clinic earlier with radiographs and physical exam as indicated. If the attending physician determines that a deep or superficial infection is present at any time during the treatment period the patient will be categorized as infected. If no infection is detected at an earlier-scheduled appointment the patient will be recasted and instructed to follow up as previously scheduled.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
160

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Missouri
      • Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65212
        • University of Missouri Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 13 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age<14 years
  • Open growth plates
  • Gartland type II or III extension type fracture of the distal humerus OR Flexion type fracture of the distal humerus

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Need for open reduction
  • Need for antibiotics due to other injuries or conditions during the entire study period
  • Immunosuppression
  • History of malignancy or metabolic bone disease
  • Open fractures
  • Pre-existing Infection
  • Intra-operative breech of sterile technique

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Pre-operative Antibiotics
Patients randomized to preoperative antibiotics will receive 25mg/kg cefazolin IV up to 1g or clindamycin 10mg/kg up to 600mg IV in cases of documented allergy to cefazolin.
Drug: Cefazolin
Primary intervention
Drug: Clindamycin
For use in Pre-operative Antibiotics arm in cases of documented allergy to primary intervention.
Placebo Comparator: Saline Placebo
Patients randomized to the no-antibiotic group will receive a saline placebo. This placebo will consist of a 10 mL pre-filled syringe of normal saline.
Drug: Saline
Placebo Intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With the Presence of Post-Operative Infection
Time Frame: Six weeks
The primary outcome measure will be the presence of infection as judged by the blinded attending surgeon at the time of cast removal. A superficial infection is defined as a clinical diagnosis based on increased erythema, granulation tissue or purulence at the pin sites that resolves with a short course of oral antibiotics. A deep infection is defined as the presence of septic arthritis or osteomyelitis requiring return to the operating room for debridement or a prolonged course of IV antibiotics. If the attending physician determines that a deep or superficial infection is present at any time during the treatment period the patient will be categorized as infected.
Six weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Pain Scale
Time Frame: Three to Six Week Follow Up
Presented as a 100mm horizontal line on which the patient's pain intensity is represented by a point between two extremes of "no pain at all" = 0 and "worst pain imaginable" = 100.
Three to Six Week Follow Up
Fractures Fully Healed
Time Frame: Three to Six Week Follow Up
Time to healing/fractures fully healed was measured by the review of AP and Lateral radiographs at the first follow-up and considered healed if at least 3 cortices had callus. This outcome measure is reported as the number of participants in each group with fully healed fractures at the designated time point.
Three to Six Week Follow Up
Number of Participants With a Need for Repeat Casting
Time Frame: Three to Six Weeks Follow Up
The need for repeat casting can be due to excessive pain or loosening of the cast.
Three to Six Weeks Follow Up
Number of Participants Experiencing Loss of Fixation
Time Frame: Three to Six Weeks Follow Up
Loss of fixation (stabilization) refers to a situation where the fixation of the fracture become compromised.
Three to Six Weeks Follow Up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sumit Gupta

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Missouri-Columbia

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sumit Gupta, MD, University of Missouri-Columbia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 18, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 10, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 10, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 23, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 25, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 16, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2008610

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Supracondylar Humerus Fracture

Clinical Trials on Cefazolin

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings