The Influence of Warm Bupivacaine on Supraclavicular Plexus Block Characteristics

November 3, 2019 updated by: Mansoura University

The Influence of Bupivacaine Temperature on Supraclavicular Plexus Block Characteristics

Despite PH adjustment of local anesthetic solution improves the quality of the block in all respects with special advantage of early onset of sensory and motor block, adequate level of analgesia, and prolongation of duration of block, the effect of warmed bupivacaine should have the same effect which have not been evaluated on supraclavicular plexus block for upper limb surgery.

The warmed bupivacaine used in supraclavicular plexus block may reduce sensory and motor block onset and prolong the duration of analgesia when compared to bupivacaine at operating room temperature.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to compare the effect of warm bupivacaine 0.5% at 37◦C versus bupivacaine 0.5% at operating room temperature at 23◦C on ultrasound-guided supraclavicular plexus block characteristics as regard sensory block onset time, motor block onset time, duration of sensory and motor block , effective duration of analgesia, total analgesics requirement, complications and side effects.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
90

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
    • DK
      • Mansourah, DK, Egypt, 050
        • Mansoura University, Faculty of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class I or II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Pregnancy
  • Neuromuscular diseases (as myopathies, myasthenia gravies…)
  • Hematological diseases
  • Bleeding disorders
  • Coagulation abnormality.
  • Psychiatric diseases.
  • Local skin infection
  • Sepsis at site of the block.
  • Known intolerance to the study drugs.
  • Body Mass Index > 40 Kg/m2.
  • Bilateral upper limb injury to be performed at the same procedure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Warm bupivacaine at (37°c)
Warmed bupivacaine at body temperature will be administered
Drug: Warm bupivacaine at (37°c)
Bupivacaine 0.5%, 30 mL, warmed to 37◦C for 20 minutes. The empty syringes and needles, in their packaging, will be held at the same temperature before initiating the block.
Active Comparator: Bupivacaine at operating room temperature (23°c)
Bupivacaine at temperature of 23°C will be administered
Drug: Bupivacaine at operating room temperature (23°c)
Bupivacaine 0.5%, 30 ml held in crash shelf of the operating room temperature at 23◦C. The empty syringes and needles will be held in the same temperature before use.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to onset of sensory block
Time Frame: for 30 min following injection
defined as the time interval between the end of local anesthetic injection and the loss of sensation to pinprick (sensory score = 1)
for 30 min following injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to onset of motor block
Time Frame: For 3 hours after the injection of local anesthetic
defined as time interval between the end of local anesthetic injection and (motor score = 1) in the distributions of all 4 peripheral nerves.
For 3 hours after the injection of local anesthetic
Heart rate
Time Frame: For 3 hours after the injection of local anesthetic
For 3 hours after the injection of local anesthetic
Blood pressure
Time Frame: For 3 hours after the injection of local anesthetic
For 3 hours after the injection of local anesthetic
oxygen saturation in the peripheral blood
Time Frame: For 3 hours after the injection of local anesthetic
For 3 hours after the injection of local anesthetic
Duration of sensory block
Time Frame: For 24 hours after the injection of local anesthetic
defined as the interval between end of injection and complete end of sensory block (score=2)
For 24 hours after the injection of local anesthetic
Duration of motor block
Time Frame: For 24 hours after the injection of local anesthetic
defined as the interval between end of injection and complete recovery of normal motor function (score=0), respectively.
For 24 hours after the injection of local anesthetic
The severity of postoperative pain
Time Frame: For 24 hours after the injection of local anesthetic
will be measured and recorded by using a 100-cm visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, where 0 is equal to no pain and 100 indicates the worst possible pain.
For 24 hours after the injection of local anesthetic
Time for first analgesic request
Time Frame: For 24 hours after the injection of local anesthetic
Time to the first receiving of rescue analgesic from the time of blockade
For 24 hours after the injection of local anesthetic
Total analgesics received
Time Frame: for 24 hrs after the injection of local anesthetic
Cumulative use of rescue analgesics after performing the blockade
for 24 hrs after the injection of local anesthetic
Satisfaction Score
Time Frame: for 48 hrs after the injection of local anesthetic
Using score including 5-Excellent, 4-Very Good, 3-Good, 2-Fair, and 1-Poor
for 48 hrs after the injection of local anesthetic

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mansoura University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Mohamed Y Makharita, MD, Professor of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 9, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 17, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 25, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 25, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 29, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 3, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MFM-IRB, MS/17.05.143

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

do not mind sharing raw data but after its publication not before.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery to the Distal One Third of the Upper Limb

Clinical Trials on Warm bupivacaine at (37°c)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings