Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Morbidly Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery

September 24, 2020 updated by: Medstar Health Research Institute

Obese women are more likely have a cesarean delivery and develop subsequent wound complications than normal weight women. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been shown to improve surgical wound healing, but this device has not been adequately studied in cesarean deliveries. The aim of our study is to determine the efficacy of NPWT in morbidly obese women after cesarean delivery.

Investigators will be randomizing women with a BMI > 40 kg/m2 in a 1:1 ratio to either NPWT (the PREVENA Incision management therapy system Pre 1001 Us) or standard dressing after their cesarean delivery at MedStar Washington Hospital Center. The NPWT will be left in place for a minimum of four days but not to exceed seven days. The standard dressing is typically removed on postoperative day one or two. The primary outcome is a wound complication defined as the formation of a wound infection, seroma, hematoma, separation, or dehiscence from delivery to 4 weeks postpartum. Investigators will also administer a patient satisfaction survey regarding their wound healing experience.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Obese women are more likely to be delivered by cesarean than normal weight women and are at increased risk for operative morbidity including wound complications. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been shown to improve wound healing, decrease the rate of surgical site infection, sero-hematoma formation, and reoperation rates. The potential benefit of NPWT in high-risk wounds after cesarean delivery is unclear. Investigators propose conducting a single-site randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of NPWT after cesarean delivery in morbidly obese women (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2).

Specific aims of the study include determining if NPWT used in morbidly obese women after cesarean delivery improves postoperative wound complication rate and to assess patient satisfaction with NPWT. The primary outcome is a composite wound complication rate defined as having one of the following occur within four weeks of delivery: wound infection, seroma, hematoma, separation, or dehiscence.

Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either NPWT or standard surgical dressing. Women receiving NWPT will have a PREVENA Incision Management Therapy System applied directly onto their skin over the closed incision after delivery. Women randomized to the standard surgical dressing will have a TELFA non-adhesive dressing with a 3M Tegaderm transparent film adhesive dressing. In addition, an abdominal pad (ABD) with foam tape may be applied to provide additional pressure if needed.

The wound will be assessed at the time of dressing removal or hospital discharge and at four weeks postoperative. Participants will also take a patient satisfaction survey regarding wound healing experience at four-week follow-up. For the study, investigators are planning to enroll 482 patients (241 per arm) to demonstrate a decrease in the wound complication rate by 50%. This study will help clinicians better manage obese women in pregnancy and hopefully improve wound outcomes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
25

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • Medstar Washington Hospital Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Body Mass Index ≥40 kg/m2 at time of delivery
  • Delivered by cesarean delivery
  • 18 years or later

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chorioamnionitis
  • Silver allergy
  • Inability to follow up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT)
Women receiving NPWT will have a PREVENA Incision Management Therapy System applied directly onto their skin over the closed incision after delivery.
Device: Negative pressure wound therapy (PREVENA Incision Management Therapy System)
After cesarean delivery, women in the intervention group will receive PREVENA Incision Management Therapy System.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Standard dressing
Device: Standard dressing
After cesarean delivery, women in the intervention group will receive standard dressing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite Wound Complication
Time Frame: Four weeks postpartum
Any of wound infection, seroma/hematoma, wound separation >1 cm, and wound dehiscence
Four weeks postpartum

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Survey
Time Frame: Four weeks postpartum
Through patient surveys administered prior to hospital discharge and at four weeks post-operative investigators will evaluate patient satisfaction with wound healing. Satisfactory measures will include how well participants think incision healed mobility after surgery, pain control, and the incision's appearance. Patients were also asked if they had emergency room visits or hospital readmissions. For patients who received NPWT investigators will assess the ease of use, comfort, and perception of its efficacy.
Four weeks postpartum

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demographic Data
Time Frame: At time time of admission
Age, race/ethnicity, parity
At time time of admission
Maternal Body Mass Index
Time Frame: At time time of admission
Prepregnancy and at the time of delivery
At time time of admission
Gestational Age at Delivery
Time Frame: At time time of admission
We were unable to adequately recruit for this study. Study was closed.
At time time of admission
Maternal Comorbidities
Time Frame: At time time of admission
Renal disease, hypertension, diabetes, psychiatric history, sleep apnea, history of venous thromboembolism
At time time of admission
Antenatal Complications
Time Frame: At time time of admission
Gestational diabetes, preeclampsia
At time time of admission
Number of Previous Cesarean Deliveries
Time Frame: At time time of admission
We were unable to adequately recruit for this study. Study was closed.
At time time of admission
Indication for Cesarean Delivery
Time Frame: At time time of cesarean delivery
Failed induction, arrest of active phase, arrest of descent, malpresentation, repeat cesarean delivery, desired cesarean
At time time of cesarean delivery
Reason for Admission
Time Frame: At the time of admission
Spontaneous labor, rupture of membranes, induction of labor, scheduled cesarean delivery, fetal condition (oligohydroamnios, growth restriction, non reassuring fetal heart tracing)
At the time of admission
Labor Duration
Time Frame: At the time of cesarean delivery
We were unable to adequately recruit for this study. Study was closed.
At the time of cesarean delivery
Endometritis
Time Frame: Four weeks postpartum
We were unable to adequately recruit for this study. Study was closed.
Four weeks postpartum
Length of Rupture of Membranes
Time Frame: At the time of cesarean delivery
We were unable to adequately recruit for this study. Study was closed.
At the time of cesarean delivery
Operative Time
Time Frame: At the time of cesarean delivery
We were unable to adequately recruit for this study. Study was closed.
At the time of cesarean delivery
Intraoperative Complication
Time Frame: At the time of cesarean delivery
Postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion, ureteral injury, bladder injury, B-lynch suture, and hysterectomy
At the time of cesarean delivery
Type of Skin Incision
Time Frame: At the time of cesarean delivery
We were unable to adequately recruit for this study. Study was closed.
At the time of cesarean delivery
Type of Uterine Incision
Time Frame: At the time of cesarean delivery
We were unable to adequately recruit for this study. Study was closed.
At the time of cesarean delivery
Type of Fascia Closure
Time Frame: At the time of cesarean delivery
We were unable to adequately recruit for this study. Study was closed.
At the time of cesarean delivery
Type of Subcutaneous Closure
Time Frame: At the time of cesarean delivery
We were unable to adequately recruit for this study. Study was closed.
At the time of cesarean delivery
Administration of Preoperative Antibiotics
Time Frame: At the time of cesarean delivery
Cefazolin, Azithromycin, Clindamycin, Gentamicin, and other
At the time of cesarean delivery
Quantitative Blood Loss
Time Frame: At the time of cesarean delivery
We were unable to adequately recruit for this study. Study was closed.
At the time of cesarean delivery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medstar Health Research Institute

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Amenity Health, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Rachael T Overcash, MD, MPH, Medstar Washington Hospital Center
  • Principal Investigator: Iqbal N Iqbal, MD, Medstar Washington Hospital Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 3, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 30, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 24, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2017-137

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity, Morbid

Clinical Trials on Negative pressure wound therapy (PREVENA Incision Management Therapy System)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings