Multiparametric High-resolution Ultrasound of the Breast

September 7, 2017 updated by: Panagiotis Kapetas, Medical University of Vienna

Multiparametric High-resolution 3-D Sonography With Color/Power-Doppler, Elastography and Contrast-enhanced Sonography for an Improved Detection and Characterization of Breast Tumors

Despite advances in mammographic technique, mammography is limited in the detection and diagnosis of breast lesions with respect to sensitivity and specificity. In recent decades, ultrasound has become an essential adjunct to mammography for the further characterization of mammographically detected or palpable lesions or in the diagnosis of patients with dense breasts.

However, in spite of defined morphological criteria for the differentiation of benign from malignant lesions, ultrasound of the breast also shows limitations regarding sensitivity and specificity. On the one hand, benign lesions may have one or more malignant characteristics and thus require a biopsy. On the other hand, malignant lesions can also show benign characteristics and thus make an accurate assessment difficult.

To overcome these limitations, newer sonographic methods have been developed. These include elastography, color and power Doppler imaging, contrast enhanced imaging and 3D sonography.

The application of elastography is based on the fact that cancer has a higher stiffness than healthy breast parenchyma.

In addition, cancers are characterized by neoangiogenesis and thus generally show an increased vascularization in color and power Doppler. The detection of neoangiogenesis can be improved by the application of contrast agents. The latter provides both morphological and functional information about tumors, through the study of the contrast agent kinetics.

Finally, 3D sonography allows for tumors to be examined in a third, coronal plane. This way, the interaction between the tumor and the surrounding healthy tissue can be better appreciated.

The objective of this study is the evaluation of suspicious (classified as BI-RADS 4 and 5) breast lesions by using high-resolution sonography, including elastography, color/power Doppler, contrast agent application and 3D sonography. Both morphological and functional information can thus be obtained. The primary hypothesis of this study is that this multiparametric approach will improve the detection and characterization of breast lesions.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

124

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical, mammographic, MR-tomographic and/or ultrasonographic verification of a suspicious breast lesion (BIRADS 4 and 5)
  • Age > 18 years
  • Written informed consent
  • Histopathological verification of the lesions either by core biopsy or by surgical excision

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable or non-compliant patients
  • Pregnant or lactating patients or patients with suspected pregnancy
  • Known contraindication to the intravenous administration of US contrast agents
  • Acute or chronic renal insufficiency
  • Pre- or post-transplant patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: 1
Multiparametric ultrasound of the breast including elastography, color/power Doppler, contrast agent application and 3D sonography.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic-ROC curve)
Time Frame: 2 years

H0: There is no difference in diagnostic accuracy of breast ultrasound through the addition of further sonographic techniques.

H1: There is a difference in diagnostic accuracy of breast ultrasound through the addition of further sonographic techniques.

2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Multiparametric breast US

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound of the breast

Search Similar Trials