The Impact of Baseline Visual Acuity on the Treatment Outcomes in Patients Treated With AflIbercept in Real-life Clinical Setting (INSIGHT)

October 26, 2018 updated by: Bayer

INSIGHT - The Impact of baseliNe viSual Acuity on the Treatment Outcomes in Patients Treated With AflIbercept in Real-life Clinical settinG. Analysis of Data From the SwedisH Macula RegisTer

The study will assess the mean change in Visual Acuity (VA) (overall and stratified by baseline VA) at year 1 and 2 of treatment with Aflibercept in real-life setting.

In addition, the study will ascertain the baseline VA in treatment -naïve Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration or neo-vascular AMD (wAMD) patients who start treatment with Aflibercept in a real-life setting and it will assess the impact of baseline VA on the outcomes of Aflibercept treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2312

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Sweden
      • Lund, Sweden
        • Many Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients registered in the Swedish Macula Register during the study period.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment-naïve eyes with neovascularization AMD, with the indication to be treated with Aflibercept. One and/or two eyes per patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Eyes treated previously with another anti-VEGF drug.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
>= 70 letters
Baseline VA >= 70 letters
Drug: Aflibercept (Eylea, BAY86-5321)
Treatment-naïve eyes with neovascularization AMD (Age-related Macular Degeneration), with the indication to be treated with Aflibercept. One and/or two eyes per patient.
36-69 letters
Baseline VA 36-69 letters
Drug: Aflibercept (Eylea, BAY86-5321)
Treatment-naïve eyes with neovascularization AMD (Age-related Macular Degeneration), with the indication to be treated with Aflibercept. One and/or two eyes per patient.
<=35 letters
Baseline VA <=35 letters
Drug: Aflibercept (Eylea, BAY86-5321)
Treatment-naïve eyes with neovascularization AMD (Age-related Macular Degeneration), with the indication to be treated with Aflibercept. One and/or two eyes per patient.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Visual Acuity (VA) (Snellen)
Time Frame: at 3±1 months, 6±1months, 12±2 months and at 24±2 months follow-up
Change in VA (Snellen) at 3±1 months, 6±1months, 12±2 months and at 24±2 months follow-up in all eyes and stratified in the three groups by Visual Acuity (VA) at baseline.
at 3±1 months, 6±1months, 12±2 months and at 24±2 months follow-up
Change in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)
Time Frame: at 3±1 months, 6±1months, 12±2 months and at 24±2 months follow-up
Change Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) in all eyes and stratified in the three groups by VA at baseline.
at 3±1 months, 6±1months, 12±2 months and at 24±2 months follow-up
Change in Lasbarhetsindex (LIX, Readability Index)
Time Frame: at 3±1 months, 6±1months, 12±2 months and at 24±2 months follow-up
Change in LIX in all eyes and stratified in the three groups by VA at baseline. LIX: Jaeger/LIX adult A chart (Ortho-KM, Lund, Sweden). The LIX-chart is a standardized readability index for measuring near vision and it is used almost ubiquitously in eye clinics in Sweden
at 3±1 months, 6±1months, 12±2 months and at 24±2 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients with Gain of vision 5 to 15 letters; > 15 letters; Loss of vision >5 to <15 letters; >15 letters or Stable -5 to +5 letters at the annual time points
Time Frame: At year 1 and year 2
Patients with Gain of vision 5-15 letters, > 15 letters; Loss of vision >5-<15 letters; >15 letters or Stable -5-+5 letters at the annual time points
At year 1 and year 2
Proportion of patients that recuperate 20/20 vision (driving vision) in all patients and stratified by baseline VA (groups 1-3)
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
In all patients and stratified by baseline VA (groups 1-3)
Up to 2 years
Proportion of patients that recuperate 20/40 vision (driving vision) in all patients and stratified by baseline VA (groups 1-3)
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
In all patients and stratified by baseline VA (groups 1-3)
Up to 2 years
Proportion of patients with no need of Vision Aid support
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Up to 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bayer

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 8, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 29, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 26, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 19473

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wet Macular Degeneration

Clinical Trials on Aflibercept (Eylea, BAY86-5321)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings