Effectiveness of Vibrating Mesh Versus Small Volume Nebuliser in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

July 17, 2019 updated by: Professor Richard Costello, Beaumont Hospital

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Bronchodilator Delivery by Vibrating Mesh (VM) Nebuliser Versus Small Volume Nebuliser During an Acute Exacerbation of COPD

When patients get an attack of COPD, one of the main treatments is regular nebulised medications called bronchodilators. These medications act by opening up the airways allowing patients to breathe easier and to reduce shortness of breath. Newer nebulisers may increase the amount of medication that gets into the lungs compared to the standard nebuliser usually used in hospital. This study is being done to assess whether increasing the amount of medication getting into the lungs using these newer nebulisers will help patients recover from a COPD exacerbation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

COPD is a common chronic respiratory disease. It is characterised by repeated episodes of acute worsening of symptoms of cough, wheeze and breathlessness called exacerbations. Exacerbations result in patients having to present to hospital for treatment. In Ireland more than one-fifth of all inpatient hospital days for the treatment of respiratory complaints are for the treatment of COPD. The administration of bronchodilators (medication to open the airway) is a central component of the treatment of COPD exacerbation. In the hospital setting these are most commonly administered via a nebuliser. The standard of care in our institution is the Hudson micromist small volume nebuliser.

However, previous studies have shown that Vibrating mesh (VM) nebulisers result in greater deposition of medication to the lungs compared to small volume nebulisers. In addition they resulted in greater improvements in lung function and breathlessness.

This study will assess the efficacy of the Aerogen Ultra VM nebuliser in a real-world setting. The VM nebuliser is readily available for use in the clinical setting and is used to administer bronchodilator therapy, within the terms of its CE Mark. This nebuliser is already in routine use in hospitals within the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) hospital group.

Patients hospitalised with an exacerbation of COPD will be recruited. There will be two study groups. Group 1 (VM Group): will receive bronchodilator (salbutamol 2.5mg/ipratropium 0.5mg) by Vibrating Mesh Nebuliser (Aerogen Ultra) with facemask and Group 2 (Standard Hospital Care): will receive bronchodilator by small volume nebuliser (Hudson Micromist) via facemask as per standard care.

Both groups will receive bronchodilator therapy four times a day which has already been prescribed by their medical team, and in accordance with recommended guidelines for treatment of COPD exacerbations. Patients will use the nebuliser for the duration of hospital stay or a maximum of 7 days. Lung function and breathlessness scores will be recorded. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that better medication delivery by VM nebulizer during an exacerbation of COPD will lead to greater bronchodilation, shorter recovery time and reduced hospital length of stay.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
62

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Ireland
      • Dublin, Ireland
        • Beaumont Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admission with acute exacerbation of COPD within 24 hours of presentation to hospital
  • Age >40
  • Confirmed COPD diagnosis (FEV1/FVC <0.70 on spirometry)
  • Willing to participate in the study and provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Admission for reason other than COPD exacerbation e.g. Heart Failure
  • Acute confusion as per clinical team
  • Allergy or contraindication to combined bronchodilator medication
  • Severe respiratory sepsis as evident by temperature >38 degrees and/or lobar pneumonia on Chest Radiograph
  • Sustained tachycardia >120bpm
  • Patients with very advanced COPD, admitted for palliative or long term care
  • Patients re-admitted within 90 days who have already been enrolled in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Vibrating Mesh Group
Patient's admitted with an acute exacerbation of COPD and prescribed nebulised combined salbutamol 2.5mg/ipratropium bromide 0.5mg (Combivent) are randomised to receive their treatment via the Aerogen Ultra (CE 0050) vibrating mesh Nebuliser.
Device: Vibrating Mesh Nebuliser
The Aerogen Ultra vibrating mesh nebuliser is an approved 13 485 class II medical device (CE marked) nebuliser licenced for the delivery of physician-prescribed medications for inhalation which are approved for use with a general purpose nebuliser. It has been shown in previous laboratory and clinical studies to have superior drug delivery to standard jet nebulisers.
Other Names:
  • Aerogen Ultra 13 485 class II medical device (CE 0050)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Standard Hospital Care Group
Patient's admitted with an acute exacerbation of COPD and prescribed nebulised combined salbutamol 2.5mg/ipratropium bromide 0.5mg (Combivent) are randomised to receive their treatment via the Hudson micromist small volume nebuliser which is the standard of care at our institution.
Device: Standard Hospital Care
The "standard hospital care" refers to the nebuliser in clinical use currently throughout Beaumont Hospital and used for the administration of nebulised medications. This is the Hudson micromist small volume nebuliser.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Time Frame: Up to 7 days
Forced spirometry measured at bedside
Up to 7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Borg breathlessness score
Time Frame: Up to 7 days
Change in patient-reported breathlessness as determined by the Borg breathlessness score
Up to 7 days
Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: Up to 7 days
Defined as time from randomisation to medical decision to discharge patient
Up to 7 days
Change in Inspiratory Capacity (IC)
Time Frame: Up to 7 days
Relaxed spirometry measured at bedside
Up to 7 days
Rate of re-exacerbation at Day 30
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
The number of repeat exacerbations following discharged from hospital. Exacerbation defined as an acute change in respiratory symptoms necessitating administration of antibiotics and/or steroids
Up to 30 days
Time to re-exacerbation .
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
The time to first repeat exacerbation following discharge.Exacerbation defined as an acute change in respiratory symptoms necessitating administration of antibiotics and/or steroids
Up to 30 days
Change in quality of life (QOL): to discharge and to Day 30
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
COPD Assessment Test Score
Up to 30 days
Personal Satisfaction Score
Time Frame: Up to 7 days
End-user questionnaire
Up to 7 days
Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1)
Time Frame: Up to 7 days
Forced spirometry measured at bedside
Up to 7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Beaumont Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Aerogen

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Richard W Costello, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 18, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 18, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 19, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 18, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 17, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • INCA NEB

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on Vibrating Mesh Nebuliser

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings