Jet or Vibrating Mesh Nebulisation for Secretion Management in ICU

November 22, 2022 updated by: NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Can Continuous or Intermittent Normal Saline Nebulisation Via a Vibrating Mesh Nebuliser or Intermittent Normal Saline Via a Standard Jet Nebuliser Improve the Lung Physiology and Secretion Viscosity in Mechanically Ventilated Patients?

Critically unwell patients in Intensive Care have a decreased ability to effectively clear secretions. High secretion load is a major risk factor in the failure of tracheal extubation failure and the requirement for reintubation. Extubation failure is a predictor of poor outcome independent of the severity of the underlying illness. Nebulisation of isotonic saline can be employed to manage secretions by reducing the secretion viscosity and facilitating clearance of respiratory sections during tracheal suction.

Standard jet nebulisers have been the mainstay of respiratory section management therapy in critical care since the early 1990s. A more recent development has been the vibrating mesh nebuliser. There is evidence of improved humidification and reduced water particle size and theoretically better transfer to the distal airways.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

1.2 Rationale The vibrating mesh nebuliser (Aerogen technology) may be superior to standard nebuliser technology.

1.3 Study hypothesis Improved secretion management with reduced tenacity of respiratory sections and potentially improved lung physiology secondary to improved humidification or reduced size of nebulised particles? 2. STUDY OBJECTIVES

Primary Endpoint Pourability of respiratory secretions (As assessed by the Qualitative Sputum Assessment Tool)

(The QSA score will assess quantity, quality/stickiness/density and colour/appearance of secretions and is described and validated in the literature3,4)

Secondary endpoints

  • Volume of secretions (increased or decreased may be beneficial)
  • Work of breathing
  • Airway resistance
  • Number of number of additional nebulised doses of saline or other drugs administered during the study period
  • Ease of sampling, in the opinion of treating nurse
  • Frequency of requiring changing the HME(heat and moisture exchange) filter
  • Length of time on ventilator
  • Length of stay in ICU/HDU(Intensive care unit/high dependancy unit)
  • ICU Mortality

    3. STUDY DESIGN 3.1 Study Population

A total of 60 patients will be recruited to the study. Each patient will be randomised to receive:

Continuous nebulisation of 0.9% normal saline using the Aerogen Solo Nebuliser (50mls/24h via a syringe feed set) OR

Intermittent nebulisation of 0.9% normal saline using the Aerogen Solo Nebuliser (5mls, 6 hourly) OR

Intermittent standard nebulisation of 0.9% normal saline using the Intersurgical Cirrus 2 self-sealing Jet Nebuliser (5 mls, 6 hourly)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged 18-80 years at time of recruitment to study
  • Ventilated via an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy with an HME filter in the circuit
  • Secretion load defined as patient requiring suctioning at least 2 times in the 6 hours prior to recruitment
  • Sputum viscosity with grades 1 to 3 pourability in the Qualitative Sputum Assessment tool
  • Not yet received saline nebulisation in the 6 hours prior to recruitment
  • Likely to be ventilated via an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy for at least 3 days in the opinion of the treating clinician

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Pulmonary embolus
  • Heart Failure (NYHA Grade III/IV)
  • Clinical evidence of frank pulmonary oedema
  • Cardiovascular instability (systolic BP ≤75 or heart rate ≥140)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Continuous nebulisation 0.9% saline Aerogen Solo vibrating mesh Nebuliser
Continuous nebulization of 0.9% normal saline using the Aerogen Solo Nebuliser (50mls/24h continuous infusion using a syringe pump)
Continuous nebulisation of 0.9% saline using the Aerogen Solo vibrating mesh nebuliser
Experimental: Intermittent nebulisation 0.9% saline Aerogen Solo vibrating mesh Nebuliser
Intermittent nebulization of 0.9% normal saline using the Aerogen Solo Nebuliser (5mls 0.9% normal saline nebulised every 6 hours)
Intermittent nebulisation of 0.9% saline using the Aerogen Solo vibrating mesh nebuliser
Active Comparator: Intermittent standard nebulisation of 0.9% saline Intersurgical Cirrus 2 self sealing Jet Nebuliser
Intermittent standard nebulization of 0.9% normal saline using the Intersurgical Cirrus 2 self-sealing Jet Nebuliser ((5mls 0.9% normal saline nebulised every 6 hours)
standard intermittent nebulisation of 0.9% saline using the Intersurgical Cirrus 2 self-sealing Jet Nebuliser

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pourability of respiratory secretions (The QSA score will assess quantity, quality/stickiness/density and colour/appearance of secretions and is described and validated in the literature3,4)
Time Frame: At 1000 and 1600 for 3 days

Pourability of respiratory secretions as assessed by the QSA (Qualitative Sputum Assessment) Tool 0-4. . As the QSA Tool score ranges from 1 to 4 in increments of 0.5, with 1 being the most pourable and 4 the least pourable.

(The QSA score will assess quantity, quality/stickiness/density and colour/appearance of secretions and is described and validated Lopez-Vidriero MT, Charman J, Keal E, De Silva DJ, Reid L. Sputum viscosity: correlation with chemical and clinical features in chronic bronchitis. Thorax. 1973 Jul;28(4):401-8. PubMed ID: 4741442

At 1000 and 1600 for 3 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Volume of secretions
Time Frame: At 1000 and 1600 for 3 days
Total volume in ml of secretions aspirated from the patient's airway at 1000 and 1600 each day
At 1000 and 1600 for 3 days
Work of breathing
Time Frame: At 1000 and 1600 for 3 days
Recorded by ventilator as pressure over volume curve for each breath in joules/min
At 1000 and 1600 for 3 days
Airway resistance
Time Frame: At 1000 and 1600 for 3 days
Recorded by the ventilator in cm H2O/L/sec at 1000 and 1600 each day
At 1000 and 1600 for 3 days
Number of number of additional nebulised doses of saline or other drugs administered during the study period
Time Frame: Number of administer nebulised drugs per 24hour per
Number of nebulized drug doses of drugs administered excluding study drugs
Number of administer nebulised drugs per 24hour per
Ease of sampling, in the opinion of the treating nurse
Time Frame: At 1000 and 1600 for 3 days
Qualitative assessment scale 1-10 . 1 very easy to sample-10 very difficult to obtain a sputum sample.
At 1000 and 1600 for 3 days
Frequency of requiring changing the HME filter
Time Frame: Number of filters used in each 24 hour period for 3 days
Number of HME(heat moisture exchange) filter changes in the previous 24-hour period
Number of filters used in each 24 hour period for 3 days
Length of time on ventilator
Time Frame: 1 years after admission to ICU/HDU(Intensive care unit/high dependance unit)
Total number of days ventilated
1 years after admission to ICU/HDU(Intensive care unit/high dependance unit)
Length of stay in ICU
Time Frame: Number of day in ICU and HDU at Queen Elizabeth University hospital
Length of stay in ICU in days
Number of day in ICU and HDU at Queen Elizabeth University hospital
Mortality
Time Frame: 28 days
Alive at 28 days- Yes/NO
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Malcolm Sim, MBcHB, nhs GGC health board

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 22, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 22, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 22, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Clinical Trials on Continuous nebulisation 0.9% saline Aerogen Solo vibrating mesh Nebuliser

3
Subscribe