Rapid Pleurodesis Through an Indwelling Pleural Catheter (RAPID)

May 6, 2020 updated by: Kevin Ma, MD, University of Pennsylvania

A Randomized, Double Blinded, Controlled Trial of a Rapid Pleurodesis Protocol After Indwelling Pleural Catheter Placement for Malignant Pleural Effusions

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate whether the use of a rapid pleurodesis protocol using 10% iodopovidone immediately after tunneled pleural catheter placement improves time to IPC removal compared to patients who receive an IPC alone.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients will be screened throughout the year as part of the clinical referral process to the Interventional Pulmonology service at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania for the management of a malignant pleural effusion. Patients eligible for inclusion based on the clinical evaluation will be approached for enrollment. Written consent will be obtained. Patients will subsequently undergo placement of a IPC under MAC as per standard clinical practice followed by complete drainage of the pleural space. Patients randomized to the rapid pleurodesis protocol arm will received 20mL of 10% iodopovidone mixed with 80mL of normal saline instilled intrapleurally through the IPC. Patients randomized to the standard of care arm will have 100mL of normal saline (placebo) instilled intrapleurally through the IPC. The mixture will be allowed to dwell for 2 hours and then completely evacuated through the IPC and the patient will be discharged home.

After discharge, all patients will continue to drain their IPC on a daily basis for 7 days. Following this, all patients will continue to drain their IPC on an every-other-day basis until total IPC output is less than 50ml per session over 3 consecutive sessions. At which point they will be asked to undergo a clamp trial of no drainage for 7 days followed by a reattempt at drainage. Patients without return of symptoms over those 7 days and minimal drainage afterwards (<50ml) will be seen in the office for possible IPC removal. Patients with return of symptoms during those 7 days or more than minimal drainage afterwards (>50mL) will be asked to continue drainage until total IPC output is again less than 50mL per session over 3 sessions.

After a passed clamp trial, patients will be evaluated in the office with a bedside ultrasound to assess for pleural apposition in 5 of 6 designated points and the absence of pleural effusions. If all criteria are met, the IPC is removed. If there is evidence of residual effusion, continued drainage will be advised.

All patients will be evaluated in the office on day 7, day 14, day 30, day 60 and day 90 after IPC placement. On each visit they will be assessed for pleural apposition with ultrasound. At day 30, 60, and 90 all patients will receive a global health related questionnaire (EORTC QLQ30) and a symptom questionnaire. At 90 days, complications rate will be assessed for the entire study period.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
11

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • University of Pennsylvania

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of MPE as defined by

    1. A diagnosis a pleural effusion in the setting of known malignancy. AND
    2. Confirmed malignant involvement of the pleural space by fluid cytology or pleural biopsy. OR
    3. Evidence of pleural disease on radiographic imaging. OR
    4. A recurrent effusion with no other identifiable cause after thorough workup.
  2. Symptomatic from the pleural effusions (shortness of breath, cough, or chest pain)
  3. Prior thoracentesis with post procedure symptomatic relief
  4. Recurrence of symptoms with re-accumulation of pleural effusion
  5. Lung re-expansion after thoracentesis on chest imaging within last 30 days

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Malignant pleural effusion due to a hematologic malignancy
  2. ECOG >4
  3. Any history of trapped lung
  4. Prior attempted pleurodesis on the affected site
  5. Age <18
  6. Pregnant or lactating
  7. Known allergy to iodopovidone (Betadine)
  8. Unable or unwilling to provide consent
  9. Uncorrectable coagulopathy (INR > 1.5, aPTT > 1.5 x the upper limit of normal) or thrombocytopenia (< 50,000)
  10. Anatomic contraindication to IPC (overlying skin abnormalities)
  11. Unable or unwilling to care for IPC and adhere to drainage protocol
  12. Need for bilateral IPC placement

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Standard of care
Subjects in this arm will receive placebo only (100mL of normal saline) into the pleural space delivered via the newly placed tunneled intrapleural catheter
Other: Placebo
  • The pleural space will be evacuated completely through the newly placed IPC
  • Only placebo (normal saline) will be instilled into the pleural space
  • The patient will be transferred to the recovery unit
  • Two hours after instillation the pleural space will be drained
  • After recovery from anesthesia and complete drainage of the pleurodesis mix, the subject will be discharged
  • Subjects will be asked to drain their effusion on a daily basis for the next 7 days and then on an every other day basis.
Experimental: Rapid pleurodesis protocol
Subjects in this arm will receive the chemical pleurodesing agent of 10% iodopovidone solution delivered to the pleural space via the newly placed tunneled intrapleural catheter
Drug: Rapid pleurodesis protocol
  • The pleural space will be evacuated completely through the newly placed IPC
  • 20mL of 10% iodopovidone and 80mL of normal saline will be instilled into the pleural space
  • The patient will be transferred to the recovery unit
  • Two hours after instillation the pleural space will be drained
  • After recovery from anesthesia and complete drainage of the pleurodesis mix, the subject will be discharged
  • Subjects will be asked to drain their effusion on a daily basis for the next 7 days and then on an every other day basis.
Other Names:
  • iodine pleurodesis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to catheter removal
Time Frame: 90 days
Time to IPC removal will be measured in days from the day of IPC placement to the day of IPC removal after meeting removal criteria as listed above.
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Global Health Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: 30 days, 60 days, and 90 days after catheter placement
The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQC30) will be used to assess global health-related quality of life. This is a 30-item questionnaire validated for use in patients with cancer. The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
30 days, 60 days, and 90 days after catheter placement
Change in symptoms of pain and breathlessness
Time Frame: 30 days, 60 days, and 90 days after catheter placement
We will use a 5 point Likert scale (5PLS) that has been created for the trial. Patients will be asked to indicate their degree of shortness of breath or chest pain during sitting, walking and lying down/sleeping on that specific day. Thus, a total of 6 scales will be utilized. Point 1 will be described as "no shortness of breath" or "no chest pain." Point 2 will be described as "mild shortness of breath" or "mild chest pain." Point 3 will be described as "moderate shortness of breath" or "moderate chest pain." Point 4 will be described as "severe shortness of breath" or "severe chest pain." Point 5 will be described as "Worst shortness of breath possible" or "Worst chest pain possible."
30 days, 60 days, and 90 days after catheter placement
Time to return of clinically significant pleural effusion
Time Frame: 90 days
This will be measured in days from the day of IPC removal to the day of return of a clinically significant pleural effusion in the same hemithorax that originally required IPC placement. A clinically significant reaccumulation of pleural fluid will be defined as an effusion with a maximum fluid depth greater than 25% of the AP window on chest CT or 1cm thoracic ultrasound along the lateral 1/3 of the thorax that is associated with shortness of breath or chest pain
90 days
Rate of successful pleurodesis at 90 days
Time Frame: 90 days
Successful pleurodesis will be defined as removal of the IPC with no clinically significant reaccumulation of pleural fluid as evaluated by chest CT or thoracic ultrasound. A clinically significant reaccumulation of pleural fluid will be defined as an effusion with a maximum fluid depth greater than 25% of the AP window on chest CT or 1cm thoracic ultrasound along the lateral 1/3 of the thorax that is associated with shortness of breath or chest pain.
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Pennsylvania

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kevin C Ma, University of Pennsylvania

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 12, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 9, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 9, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 24, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 26, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 30, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 8, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 6, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 827688

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pleural Diseases

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings