- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03325192
Rapid Pleurodesis Through an Indwelling Pleural Catheter (RAPID)
A Randomized, Double Blinded, Controlled Trial of a Rapid Pleurodesis Protocol After Indwelling Pleural Catheter Placement for Malignant Pleural Effusions
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients will be screened throughout the year as part of the clinical referral process to the Interventional Pulmonology service at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania for the management of a malignant pleural effusion. Patients eligible for inclusion based on the clinical evaluation will be approached for enrollment. Written consent will be obtained. Patients will subsequently undergo placement of a IPC under MAC as per standard clinical practice followed by complete drainage of the pleural space. Patients randomized to the rapid pleurodesis protocol arm will received 20mL of 10% iodopovidone mixed with 80mL of normal saline instilled intrapleurally through the IPC. Patients randomized to the standard of care arm will have 100mL of normal saline (placebo) instilled intrapleurally through the IPC. The mixture will be allowed to dwell for 2 hours and then completely evacuated through the IPC and the patient will be discharged home.
After discharge, all patients will continue to drain their IPC on a daily basis for 7 days. Following this, all patients will continue to drain their IPC on an every-other-day basis until total IPC output is less than 50ml per session over 3 consecutive sessions. At which point they will be asked to undergo a clamp trial of no drainage for 7 days followed by a reattempt at drainage. Patients without return of symptoms over those 7 days and minimal drainage afterwards (<50ml) will be seen in the office for possible IPC removal. Patients with return of symptoms during those 7 days or more than minimal drainage afterwards (>50mL) will be asked to continue drainage until total IPC output is again less than 50mL per session over 3 sessions.
After a passed clamp trial, patients will be evaluated in the office with a bedside ultrasound to assess for pleural apposition in 5 of 6 designated points and the absence of pleural effusions. If all criteria are met, the IPC is removed. If there is evidence of residual effusion, continued drainage will be advised.
All patients will be evaluated in the office on day 7, day 14, day 30, day 60 and day 90 after IPC placement. On each visit they will be assessed for pleural apposition with ultrasound. At day 30, 60, and 90 all patients will receive a global health related questionnaire (EORTC QLQ30) and a symptom questionnaire. At 90 days, complications rate will be assessed for the entire study period.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- University of Pennsylvania
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of MPE as defined by
- A diagnosis a pleural effusion in the setting of known malignancy. AND
- Confirmed malignant involvement of the pleural space by fluid cytology or pleural biopsy. OR
- Evidence of pleural disease on radiographic imaging. OR
- A recurrent effusion with no other identifiable cause after thorough workup.
- Symptomatic from the pleural effusions (shortness of breath, cough, or chest pain)
- Prior thoracentesis with post procedure symptomatic relief
- Recurrence of symptoms with re-accumulation of pleural effusion
- Lung re-expansion after thoracentesis on chest imaging within last 30 days
Exclusion Criteria:
- Malignant pleural effusion due to a hematologic malignancy
- ECOG >4
- Any history of trapped lung
- Prior attempted pleurodesis on the affected site
- Age <18
- Pregnant or lactating
- Known allergy to iodopovidone (Betadine)
- Unable or unwilling to provide consent
- Uncorrectable coagulopathy (INR > 1.5, aPTT > 1.5 x the upper limit of normal) or thrombocytopenia (< 50,000)
- Anatomic contraindication to IPC (overlying skin abnormalities)
- Unable or unwilling to care for IPC and adhere to drainage protocol
- Need for bilateral IPC placement
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Standard of care
Subjects in this arm will receive placebo only (100mL of normal saline) into the pleural space delivered via the newly placed tunneled intrapleural catheter
|
|
|
Experimental: Rapid pleurodesis protocol
Subjects in this arm will receive the chemical pleurodesing agent of 10% iodopovidone solution delivered to the pleural space via the newly placed tunneled intrapleural catheter
|
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to catheter removal
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Time to IPC removal will be measured in days from the day of IPC placement to the day of IPC removal after meeting removal criteria as listed above.
|
90 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Global Health Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: 30 days, 60 days, and 90 days after catheter placement
|
The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQC30) will be used to assess global health-related quality of life.
This is a 30-item questionnaire validated for use in patients with cancer.
The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures.
These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items.
Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale.
All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100.
A high scale score represents a higher response level.
Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
|
30 days, 60 days, and 90 days after catheter placement
|
|
Change in symptoms of pain and breathlessness
Time Frame: 30 days, 60 days, and 90 days after catheter placement
|
We will use a 5 point Likert scale (5PLS) that has been created for the trial.
Patients will be asked to indicate their degree of shortness of breath or chest pain during sitting, walking and lying down/sleeping on that specific day.
Thus, a total of 6 scales will be utilized.
Point 1 will be described as "no shortness of breath" or "no chest pain."
Point 2 will be described as "mild shortness of breath" or "mild chest pain."
Point 3 will be described as "moderate shortness of breath" or "moderate chest pain."
Point 4 will be described as "severe shortness of breath" or "severe chest pain."
Point 5 will be described as "Worst shortness of breath possible" or "Worst chest pain possible."
|
30 days, 60 days, and 90 days after catheter placement
|
|
Time to return of clinically significant pleural effusion
Time Frame: 90 days
|
This will be measured in days from the day of IPC removal to the day of return of a clinically significant pleural effusion in the same hemithorax that originally required IPC placement.
A clinically significant reaccumulation of pleural fluid will be defined as an effusion with a maximum fluid depth greater than 25% of the AP window on chest CT or 1cm thoracic ultrasound along the lateral 1/3 of the thorax that is associated with shortness of breath or chest pain
|
90 days
|
|
Rate of successful pleurodesis at 90 days
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Successful pleurodesis will be defined as removal of the IPC with no clinically significant reaccumulation of pleural fluid as evaluated by chest CT or thoracic ultrasound.
A clinically significant reaccumulation of pleural fluid will be defined as an effusion with a maximum fluid depth greater than 25% of the AP window on chest CT or 1cm thoracic ultrasound along the lateral 1/3 of the thorax that is associated with shortness of breath or chest pain.
|
90 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kevin C Ma, University of Pennsylvania
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Roberts ME, Neville E, Berrisford RG, Antunes G, Ali NJ; BTS Pleural Disease Guideline Group. Management of a malignant pleural effusion: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010 Aug;65 Suppl 2:ii32-40. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.136994. No abstract available.
- King MT. The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 1996 Dec;5(6):555-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00439229.
- Davies HE, Mishra EK, Kahan BC, Wrightson JM, Stanton AE, Guhan A, Davies CW, Grayez J, Harrison R, Prasad A, Crosthwaite N, Lee YC, Davies RJ, Miller RF, Rahman NM. Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME2 randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2383-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5535.
- Antunes G, Neville E, Duffy J, Ali N; Pleural Diseases Group, Standards of Care Committee, British Thoracic Society. BTS guidelines for the management of malignant pleural effusions. Thorax. 2003 May;58 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii29-38. doi: 10.1136/thorax.58.suppl_2.ii29. No abstract available.
- American Thoracic Society. Management of malignant pleural effusions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Nov;162(5):1987-2001. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.5.ats8-00. No abstract available.
- Wahidi MM, Reddy C, Yarmus L, Feller-Kopman D, Musani A, Shepherd RW, Lee H, Bechara R, Lamb C, Shofer S, Mahmood K, Michaud G, Puchalski J, Rafeq S, Cattaneo SM, Mullon J, Leh S, Mayse M, Thomas SM, Peterson B, Light RW. Randomized Trial of Pleural Fluid Drainage Frequency in Patients with Malignant Pleural Effusions. The ASAP Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 15;195(8):1050-1057. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201607-1404OC.
- Lui MM, Thomas R, Lee YC. Complications of indwelling pleural catheter use and their management. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2016 Feb 5;3(1):e000123. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2015-000123. eCollection 2016.
- Reddy C, Ernst A, Lamb C, Feller-Kopman D. Rapid pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusions: a pilot study. Chest. 2011 Jun;139(6):1419-1423. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1868. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
- Krochmal R, Reddy C, Yarmus L, Desai NR, Feller-Kopman D, Lee HJ. Patient evaluation for rapid pleurodesis of malignant pleural effusions. J Thorac Dis. 2016 Sep;8(9):2538-2543. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.08.55.
- Boujaoude Z, Bartter T, Abboud M, Pratter M, Abouzgheib W. Pleuroscopic Pleurodesis Combined With Tunneled Pleural Catheter for Management of Malignant Pleural Effusion: A Prospective Observational Study. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2015 Jul;22(3):237-43. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000186.
- Ahmed L, Ip H, Rao D, Patel N, Noorzad F. Talc pleurodesis through indwelling pleural catheters for malignant pleural effusions: retrospective case series of a novel clinical pathway. Chest. 2014 Dec;146(6):e190-e194. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0394.
- Sivakumar P, Douiri A, West A, Rao D, Warwick G, Chen T, Ahmed L. OPTIMUM: a protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing Out Patient Talc slurry via Indwelling pleural catheter for Malignant pleural effusion vs Usual inpatient Management. BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 18;6(10):e012795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012795. Erratum In: BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 14;6(11):e012795corr1.
- Neto JD, de Oliveira SF, Vianna SP, Terra RM. Efficacy and safety of iodopovidone pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusions. Respirology. 2010 Jan;15(1):115-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2009.01663.x. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
- Agarwal R, Paul AS, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, Jindal SK. A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of cosmetic talc compared with iodopovidone for chemical pleurodesis. Respirology. 2011 Oct;16(7):1064-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.01999.x.
- Olivares-Torres CA, Laniado-Laborin R, Chavez-Garcia C, Leon-Gastelum C, Reyes-Escamilla A, Light RW. Iodopovidone pleurodesis for recurrent pleural effusions. Chest. 2002 Aug;122(2):581-3. doi: 10.1378/chest.122.2.581.
- Godazandeh G, Qasemi NH, Saghafi M, Mortazian M, Tayebi P. Pleurodesis with povidone-iodine, as an effective procedure in management of patients with malignant pleural effusion. J Thorac Dis. 2013 Apr;5(2):141-4. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.02.02.
- Agarwal R, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, Jindal SK. Efficacy and safety of iodopovidone in chemical pleurodesis: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Respir Med. 2006 Nov;100(11):2043-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.02.009. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 827688
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pleural Diseases
-
China-Japan Friendship HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingPleural Effusion | Exudative Pleural Effusion | Transudative Pleural Effusion
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedThoracoscopy | Pleural Effusion DisorderEgypt
-
Clover Biopharmaceuticals AUS Pty LtdCompletedMalignant Pleural EffusionsAustralia
-
JemincareRecruitingMalignant Pleural Effusions (Mpe)China
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingPleural NeoplasmUnited States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityEnrolling by invitationMalignant Pleural EffusionsUnited States
-
Eastern Regional Medical CenterRecruitingLoculated or Non-draining Malignant Pleural EffusionsUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingMalignant Pleural EffusionEgypt
-
JemincareZhejiang Hangyu Pharmaceutical Co., LtdRecruitingMalignant Pleural EffusionChina
Clinical Trials on Placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AkesoNot yet recruitingAtopic DermatitisChina
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
West Penn Allegheny Health SystemCompletedAsthma | Allergic RhinitisUnited States