Comparison of PVI-guided Fluid Management With Traditional Fluid Management in Colorectal Surgery

November 7, 2017 updated by: Sevim Cesur, Kocaeli University
The first objective of this study was to compare the traditional fluid management (TFM) with PVI guided goal-directed fluid management (GDFM) in terms of controlled intraoperative fluid volume, surgical end-point fluid balance, blood lactate and serum creatinine levels. ASA I-II 70 patients included in this prospective study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Objectives: The first objective of our study was to compare the traditional fluid management (TFM) with PVI guided goal-directed fluid management (GDFM) in terms of controlled intraoperative fluid volume, surgical end-point fluid balance, blood lactate and serum creatinine levels. Our secondary purpose was to compare the effects of different fluid regimens on the return of bowel function and the duration of hospital stay. Methods: The study included 70 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II patients, aged above 18 and undergoing elective colorectal surgery. After premedication with 0.03 mg /kg i.v. midazolam, all patients were started an i.v. infusion of 500 mL 0.9 % NaCl until the end of anesthesia induction.

After the anesthesia induction, while 0.9 % NaCl at rate of 2 mL/kg/h was infused in PVI- guided GDFM group, a 250-mL bolus gelatin injection (Gelofusine®, Barun) was administered when PVI was higher than 13 % over 5 min. While 0.9 % NaCl at rate of 4- 8 mL/kg/h was infused in TFM group, a 250-ml bolus gelatin injection (Gelofusine®, Barun) was administered when the mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) decreased below 65 mmHg. In both groups, when MAP was still < 65 mmHg after fluid bolus infusion, 5 mg i.v. bolus ephedrine was administered. The data collected during intraoperative period, such as heart rate, MAP, arterial blood gas samples (Ph, arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2), arterial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2), HCO3 level, hemoglobin, blood lactate level) were recorded. Hemoglobin, Na, K, Cl, serum creatinine, blood lactate and serum albumin scores were measured preoperatively, and up to 24 hours postoperative.

In the first 24 hours after surgery, oliguria (<0.5 ml / kg urine output), need for blood transfusion and the time of first bowel movement (depending on the days after surgery), length of hospital stay were recorded.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
70

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • > 18 age
  • elective colorectal suregry
  • ASA 1-2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic renal disease
  • Ejection fraction < 30
  • arthmia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: pvı-guided
pvı-guided(according to pvi value) fluid infused during whole procedure 2 ml/kg/h infusion during surgery
Other: pvı-guided
pvı- guided total amount of crystalloid volume of fluid infused during colorectal surgery pvı-guided(according to pvi value) fluid infused during whole procedure 2 ml/kg/h infusion during surgery If PVI value <%13 and if MAP>65mmHg continue with 2 ml/kg/h cristalloid infusion If PVI value <%13 and if MAP>65mmHg 5 mcg efedrin intravenous bolus till MAP>65 mmHg If PVI value >%13 and MAP>65 mmHg infuse 250 ml Gelofusine bolus up to PVI value lowers to %13 every 5 minute If PVI value >%13 and MAP <65 mmHg infuse 250 ml Gelofusine bolus and 5 mcg efedrin intravenous up to PVI value lowers to %13
Experimental: traditional-guided
4-8 ml/kg/h infusion during surgery
Other: traditional-guided
traditional-guided total amount of crystalloid volume of fluid infused during colorectal surgery traditional-guided fluid infused during whole procedure 4-8 ml/kg/h infusion during surgery If MAP <65 mmHg or <30%of basal value, infuse 250 ml Gelofusine bolus and 5 mcg efedrin If MAP>65 mmHg no intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FLUID MANAGEMENT
Time Frame: two hours
total fluid given during colorectal surgery
two hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Kocaeli University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sevim Cesur, MD, specialist
  • Study Director: Tülay Hoşten, MD, specialist

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 25, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 7, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • KOU KAEK 2015/99

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fluid Overload

Clinical Trials on pvı-guided

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings