Topical Versus Oral Metronidazole Following Excisional Haemorrhoidectomy

November 2, 2020 updated by: Andrew G Hill, MBChB, MD (Thesis), EdD, FACS, FRACS, University of Auckland, New Zealand

A Prospective, Multicentre, Double-Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Topical Versus Oral Metronidazole in Reducing Post-Operative Pain Following Excisional Haemorrhoidectomy

This study aims to determine if topical metronidazole reduces pain more than oral metronidazole following excisional haemorrhoidectomy. The trial will be a multi-centered, patient and investigator blinded superiority trial with two parallel groups and a primary outcome of pain scores during 14 days after surgery.

Group A will receive oral metronidazole and placebo cream. Group B will receive placebo tablets and topical metronidazole cream.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The pathogenesis of post-operative excisional haemorrhoidectomy pain is multi-factorial with secondary bacterial colonisation, inflammation and anal sphincter spasm/hypertonicity all purposed to play a role. Several pharmacological agents have been introduced in the last two decades targeting specific parts of the hypothesized pathway of pain pathogenesis showing promising improvements.

Metronidazole is part of the nitroimidazole class of antibiotics and primarily affects anaerobic bacteria and protozoa and traditionally has been used in surgical prophylaxis and treating anaerobic infections. It has been postulated to decrease pain following EH via two mechanisms; first by decreasing secondary bacterial colonisation and hence reducing post-operative inflammation; and second via a hitherto poorly understood direct anti-inflammatory response. The oral route has been initially investigated but topical administration has more recently been mooted for analgesia and theoretically reduces the unpleasant systemic side effects of oral administration. Our research group has recently completed a systematic review of both oral and topical administration of metronidazole. This review showed benefit in reducing postoperative haemorrhoidectomy pain from both routes of administration but this far there has been no comparison of the two routes.

Metronidazole has been proposed to have both anti-bacterial and pleiotropic anti-inflammatory properties but its precise mechanism of action is unknown. The increased understanding of this novel use of an agent with a known pharmacological profile will generally broaden our use of a simple, cheap and widespread agent. The investigators hope research into this drug will enable its use beyond that of haemorrhoidectomies, with possible pleiotropic applications into other similar operations.

Given the high prevalence of haemorrhoids in a vital segment of New Zealand's population, this research will contribute to improved outcomes for affected patients. Decreasing the significant post-operative pain will improve the quality of life for New Zealanders as well as affected populations worldwide. Socially and financially, it will enable earlier return to normal activity and reduce the burden on visits and readmissions to primary and secondary care, respectively.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • New Zealand
      • Auckland, New Zealand
        • Manukau SuperClinic, Counties Manukau District Health Board
      • Auckland, New Zealand
        • Ormiston Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients undergoing excisional haemorrhoidectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • < 16 years of age
  • Have a simultaneous operation other than excisional haemorrhoidectomy
  • History of chronic pain
  • Previous allergy/adverse reaction to metronidazole
  • Patients unable to consent or complete data questionnaires due to cognitive impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Group A - Oral
Oral metronidazole 400mg 3 times a day for 7 days Placebo ointment applied 3 time times a day for 7 days to affected region
Drug: Metronidazole Oral
Oral Metronidazole
Drug: Placebo Ointment
Placebo Ointment
Experimental: Group B - Topical
Topical metronidazole ointment 10% 3 times a day for 7 days Oral placebo tablets 3 times a day for 7 days
Drug: Metronidazole Ointment
Metronidazole Ointment
Drug: Placebo Oral Tablet
Placebo Tablet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Daily Post-Operative Pain
Time Frame: Day 7
Daily Post-Operative Pain Measured on Visual Analogue Scale (0 to 10)
Day 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Analgesia Use
Time Frame: Day 7
Measured in Morphine Equivalent Doses
Day 7
Complication Rates
Time Frame: Day 30
Short term complication rates including adverse reactions, bleeding, paraesthesiae, urinary retention, readmission
Day 30
Return to Normal Activity
Time Frame: Day 30 (Followed up until returned back to normal)
Time to return back to normal activity
Day 30 (Followed up until returned back to normal)
Return of Bowel Function
Time Frame: Day 7
Time for first bowel motion
Day 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Auckland, New Zealand

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Andrew G Hill, MBChB, The University of Auckland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 11, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 3, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 2, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MetHaemorrhoid

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Not to be shared

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Metronidazole Oral

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings