Metabonomics to Investigate Effects of Healthy Diets on Blood Pressure: the OmniHeart Study

December 6, 2017 updated by: University of Kent

Urinary Metabolic Phenotyping of Diet-cardiovascular Disease Risk Associations: the OmniHeart Feeding Trial

To compare the urinary metabolomes on individuals undergone three different healthy diets--a carbohydrate-rich diet, a protein-rich diet, or a diet rich in unsaturated fat.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND:

This study based on the OmniHeart dietary intervention study, a randomized, three period cross-over feeding study that compared the effects on blood pressure and plasma lipids of three DASH-like diets: a carbohydrate-rich (CARB) diet pattern, a rich in protein (PROT) and a rich in unsaturated (MUFA) fat, predominantly monounsaturated fat diet (see full details of OmniHeart dietary intervention https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT00051350).

This metabonomic study aims to evaluate the feasibility of identifying individuals showing variation in clinical response to three different healthy diets, with the purpose of reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) based metabolic phenotyping approach.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
158

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • with pre-hypertension (systolic BP of 120 to 139 mmHg and/or diastolic BP of 80 to 89 mmHg) or stage 1 hypertension (systolic BP of 140 to 159 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP of 90 to 99 mm Hg) and without diabetes or prior CVD

Exclusion Criteria:

  • CVD or diabetes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Baseline
Baseline corresponds to typical American diet
Other: CARB rich diet
Consumed CARB rich diet for 6 weeks with a washout period of at least 2 weeks before the next intervention
Other: MUFA rich diet
Consumed MUFA rich diet for 6 weeks with a washout period of at least 2 weeks before the next intervention
Other: PROT rich diet
Consumed PROT rich diet for 6 weeks with a washout period of at least 2 weeks before the next intervention
Active Comparator: PROT rich diet
Protein rich diet for 6 weeks
Other: CARB rich diet
Consumed CARB rich diet for 6 weeks with a washout period of at least 2 weeks before the next intervention
Other: MUFA rich diet
Consumed MUFA rich diet for 6 weeks with a washout period of at least 2 weeks before the next intervention
Active Comparator: MUFA rich diet
MUFA rich diet for 6 weeks
Other: CARB rich diet
Consumed CARB rich diet for 6 weeks with a washout period of at least 2 weeks before the next intervention
Other: PROT rich diet
Consumed PROT rich diet for 6 weeks with a washout period of at least 2 weeks before the next intervention
Active Comparator: CARB rich diet
CARB rich diet for 6 weeks
Other: MUFA rich diet
Consumed MUFA rich diet for 6 weeks with a washout period of at least 2 weeks before the next intervention
Other: PROT rich diet
Consumed PROT rich diet for 6 weeks with a washout period of at least 2 weeks before the next intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Systolic blood pressure (SBP)
Time Frame: post 6 weeks intervention
SBP reduction in mmHg
post 6 weeks intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diastolic blood pressure (DBP)
Time Frame: post 6 weeks intervention
DBP reduction in mmHg
post 6 weeks intervention
low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL)
Time Frame: post 6 weeks intervention
LDL reduction in mg/dl
post 6 weeks intervention
high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL)
Time Frame: post 6 weeks intervention
HDL reduction in mg/dl
post 6 weeks intervention
triglycerides (TG)
Time Frame: post 6 weeks intervention
TG reduction in mg/dl
post 6 weeks intervention
total cholesterol
Time Frame: post 6 weeks intervention
reduction in mg/dl
post 6 weeks intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Kent

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 31, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 6, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 12, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 6, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 11/LO/0773
  • G1002151 (Other Grant/Funding Number: MRC)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on CARB rich diet

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings