Assessment of Positron Emission Tomography to Early Detect Frailty in Onco-geriatry (FOGTEP)

August 23, 2022 updated by: Antoine VERGER, Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Oncogeriatric frailty assessment is a multifactorial approach to determine the most appropriate treatment for the health status of elderly cancer patients and this assessment is recommended for patients over 75 years of age.

Oncogeriatric frailty is based on the SIOG-2 (International Society of Geriatric Oncology-2) clinical scale (assessing comorbidities, autonomy, nutrition, cognitive and thymic domains) defining 3 levels of frailty: (1) harmonious aging, (2) vulnerability (reversible stage), (3) fragility (irreversible stage).

So,the management of very old or very frailty patients with poor tolerance or compliance to treatment, often requires to defer standard treatment and monitoring procedures. That is detrimental to these patients prognosis. By contrast with elderly or very old patients without frailty criteria, could benefit from more efficient procedures.

More generally, frailty is associated directly with a cerebral impact on a cognitive or thymic status or indirectly with the cognitive or thymic impacts related with other components (nutritional or autonomy or walking poor status, comorbidities) 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET), is routinely performed in follow-up cancer patients in most cases, including older patients, to detect neoplastic localizations on the whole body. It also accurately quantifies cerebral glycolytic metabolism when early brain recording is performed. Brain metabolism reflects the neuronal synaptic activity. It is generally decreased in particular brain areas due of neurodegenerative damage with a little or no symptom, of thymic involvement particular in depression or during accelerated cerebral aging of vascular origin. The impairment of the brain function of the elderly, as evidenced by 18F-FDG PET, is most often multifactorial, as frailty. Above all, brain changes are visualized with 18F-FDG PET much earlier than using neuropsychological tests, especially for cognitive impairment.

Our hypothesis is that with 18F-FDG PET, performed routinely in the initial assessment in elderly patients with cancer, it is also possible to obtain reliable and objective parameters of brain function and frailty. 18F-FDG PET is already used to identify cognitive and thymic impairment. This exam would help to assess the frailty and to adapt as best oncologic treatments some of which can also be neurotoxic. 18F-FDG PET is therefore related to brain function in frail patients

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
37

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Vandoeuvre les Nancy cedex, France, 54511
        • CHRU NANCY Brabois, nuclear medicine department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

75 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients who are more than 75 years old with written informed consent
  • patients referred for 18F-FDG PET in an oncological disease newly diagnosed
  • patients insured under social security

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with disease in final stage and life expectancy less than 6 months
  • patients under guardianship or curators
  • patients with abnormal neurological tests: MMS< 27, with neoplastic or other brain lesions or showing ischemic or cerebral stroke damage
  • confused or agitated patient unable to realize a PET
  • radiotherapy ou chemiotherapy one year at least of the patient enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: patients over 75 years old with cancer discovery
Elderly patients with cancer have a 18F-FDG PET whole body performed routinely in the initial assessment . A cerebral recording is added 45 minutes after the 18F-FDG injection and just before the registered whole body
Radiation: Brain PET/CT step
a cerebral PET/CT will be registered on the 45th minute after 18F-FDG injection and just before the whole body recording. This recording does'nt need a new injection but needs a low dose scanner

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Volume of brain with damages detected by quantitative analysis SPM (Statistical Parametric Mapping)
Time Frame: through the completion of the study on average 24 months
Metabolism of PET cerebral images and correlation with different groups of frailty at the initial visit
through the completion of the study on average 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Volume of brain with damages detected by quantitative analysis SPM between 2 patient's group with MMSE (MiniMental State Examination) results and threshold value as 24
Time Frame: 20 months, according to the results of neurology tests at the initial visit and at the 6 month
Metabolism of PET cerebral images and correlation into 2 frailty groups defined by their results MMSE (MiniMental State Examination) test : group 1 with MMSE < or = 24 and group 2 with MMSE>24, at the initial visit and at the 6 month visit
20 months, according to the results of neurology tests at the initial visit and at the 6 month
Volume of brain with damages detected by quantitative analysis SPM between 2 patient's groups with GDS (Geriatric Depression Scale) results and threshold value as 5
Time Frame: 20 months, according to the results of neurology tests at the initial visit and at the 6 month
Metabolism of PET cerebral images and correlation into 2 frailty groups defined by their results GDS (Geriatric Depression Scale) test : group 1 with GDS < or = 5 and group 2 with GDS>5 at the initial visit and at the 6 month visit
20 months, according to the results of neurology tests at the initial visit and at the 6 month
Volume of brain with damages detected by quantitative analysis SPM between different groups according to the SIOG-2 scale
Time Frame: 20 months, according to the results of neurology tests at the initial visit and at the 6 month
Metabolism of PET cerebral images and correlation into different patients groups according to the SIOG-2 scale during the geriatric visit over 6 months
20 months, according to the results of neurology tests at the initial visit and at the 6 month
Volume of brain with damages detected by quantitative analysis SPM between 2 patient's groups according to an unscheduled hospitalisation over 6 months or no
Time Frame: 20 months,according to the results of neurology tests at the initial visit and at the 6 month
Metabolism of PET cerebral images and correlation into 2 patients groups with known frailty or no defined by an unscheduled hospitalisations at 6 months
20 months,according to the results of neurology tests at the initial visit and at the 6 month
Volume of brain with damages detected by quantitative analysis SPM between 2 patient's groups according to non cancer related death at 12 months or no
Time Frame: 24 months,according to the death or not of the patients asked 12 months after the inclusion
Metabolism of PET cerebral images and correlation with known excess frailty or no defined by a death non cancer related at 12 months
24 months,according to the death or not of the patients asked 12 months after the inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Antoine VERGER, MD, PhD, CHRU NANCY, IADI INSERM U1254

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 24, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 10, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 24, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 23, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PSS2017/FOGTEP-VERGER/VS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patients Over 75 Years Old With a Cancer Discovery

Clinical Trials on Brain PET/CT step

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings