Assessment of Positron Emission Tomography to Early Detect Frailty in Onco-geriatry (FOGTEP)

August 23, 2022 updated by: Antoine VERGER, Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Oncogeriatric frailty assessment is a multifactorial approach to determine the most appropriate treatment for the health status of elderly cancer patients and this assessment is recommended for patients over 75 years of age.

Oncogeriatric frailty is based on the SIOG-2 (International Society of Geriatric Oncology-2) clinical scale (assessing comorbidities, autonomy, nutrition, cognitive and thymic domains) defining 3 levels of frailty: (1) harmonious aging, (2) vulnerability (reversible stage), (3) fragility (irreversible stage).

So,the management of very old or very frailty patients with poor tolerance or compliance to treatment, often requires to defer standard treatment and monitoring procedures. That is detrimental to these patients prognosis. By contrast with elderly or very old patients without frailty criteria, could benefit from more efficient procedures.

More generally, frailty is associated directly with a cerebral impact on a cognitive or thymic status or indirectly with the cognitive or thymic impacts related with other components (nutritional or autonomy or walking poor status, comorbidities) 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET), is routinely performed in follow-up cancer patients in most cases, including older patients, to detect neoplastic localizations on the whole body. It also accurately quantifies cerebral glycolytic metabolism when early brain recording is performed. Brain metabolism reflects the neuronal synaptic activity. It is generally decreased in particular brain areas due of neurodegenerative damage with a little or no symptom, of thymic involvement particular in depression or during accelerated cerebral aging of vascular origin. The impairment of the brain function of the elderly, as evidenced by 18F-FDG PET, is most often multifactorial, as frailty. Above all, brain changes are visualized with 18F-FDG PET much earlier than using neuropsychological tests, especially for cognitive impairment.

Our hypothesis is that with 18F-FDG PET, performed routinely in the initial assessment in elderly patients with cancer, it is also possible to obtain reliable and objective parameters of brain function and frailty. 18F-FDG PET is already used to identify cognitive and thymic impairment. This exam would help to assess the frailty and to adapt as best oncologic treatments some of which can also be neurotoxic. 18F-FDG PET is therefore related to brain function in frail patients

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vandoeuvre les Nancy cedex, France, 54511
        • CHRU NANCY Brabois, nuclear medicine department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

75 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients who are more than 75 years old with written informed consent
  • patients referred for 18F-FDG PET in an oncological disease newly diagnosed
  • patients insured under social security

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with disease in final stage and life expectancy less than 6 months
  • patients under guardianship or curators
  • patients with abnormal neurological tests: MMS< 27, with neoplastic or other brain lesions or showing ischemic or cerebral stroke damage
  • confused or agitated patient unable to realize a PET
  • radiotherapy ou chemiotherapy one year at least of the patient enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: patients over 75 years old with cancer discovery
Elderly patients with cancer have a 18F-FDG PET whole body performed routinely in the initial assessment . A cerebral recording is added 45 minutes after the 18F-FDG injection and just before the registered whole body
a cerebral PET/CT will be registered on the 45th minute after 18F-FDG injection and just before the whole body recording. This recording does'nt need a new injection but needs a low dose scanner

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Volume of brain with damages detected by quantitative analysis SPM (Statistical Parametric Mapping)
Time Frame: through the completion of the study on average 24 months
Metabolism of PET cerebral images and correlation with different groups of frailty at the initial visit
through the completion of the study on average 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Volume of brain with damages detected by quantitative analysis SPM between 2 patient's group with MMSE (MiniMental State Examination) results and threshold value as 24
Time Frame: 20 months, according to the results of neurology tests at the initial visit and at the 6 month
Metabolism of PET cerebral images and correlation into 2 frailty groups defined by their results MMSE (MiniMental State Examination) test : group 1 with MMSE < or = 24 and group 2 with MMSE>24, at the initial visit and at the 6 month visit
20 months, according to the results of neurology tests at the initial visit and at the 6 month
Volume of brain with damages detected by quantitative analysis SPM between 2 patient's groups with GDS (Geriatric Depression Scale) results and threshold value as 5
Time Frame: 20 months, according to the results of neurology tests at the initial visit and at the 6 month
Metabolism of PET cerebral images and correlation into 2 frailty groups defined by their results GDS (Geriatric Depression Scale) test : group 1 with GDS < or = 5 and group 2 with GDS>5 at the initial visit and at the 6 month visit
20 months, according to the results of neurology tests at the initial visit and at the 6 month
Volume of brain with damages detected by quantitative analysis SPM between different groups according to the SIOG-2 scale
Time Frame: 20 months, according to the results of neurology tests at the initial visit and at the 6 month
Metabolism of PET cerebral images and correlation into different patients groups according to the SIOG-2 scale during the geriatric visit over 6 months
20 months, according to the results of neurology tests at the initial visit and at the 6 month
Volume of brain with damages detected by quantitative analysis SPM between 2 patient's groups according to an unscheduled hospitalisation over 6 months or no
Time Frame: 20 months,according to the results of neurology tests at the initial visit and at the 6 month
Metabolism of PET cerebral images and correlation into 2 patients groups with known frailty or no defined by an unscheduled hospitalisations at 6 months
20 months,according to the results of neurology tests at the initial visit and at the 6 month
Volume of brain with damages detected by quantitative analysis SPM between 2 patient's groups according to non cancer related death at 12 months or no
Time Frame: 24 months,according to the death or not of the patients asked 12 months after the inclusion
Metabolism of PET cerebral images and correlation with known excess frailty or no defined by a death non cancer related at 12 months
24 months,according to the death or not of the patients asked 12 months after the inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Antoine VERGER, MD, PhD, CHRU NANCY, IADI INSERM U1254

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 24, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 10, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PSS2017/FOGTEP-VERGER/VS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patients Over 75 Years Old With a Cancer Discovery

Clinical Trials on Brain PET/CT step

3
Subscribe