Robotic-assisted Hysterectomy: Single- vs. Multi-port Laparoscopic Access
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study is scheduled to start February 2018 and compares robotic single-site hysterectomy to conventional multiport hysterectomy. Procedures are performed by an experienced two-surgeon team. Patients are randomized to either conventional multiport hysterectomy (N=62) or R-SSH (N=62). Eligibility criteria are the same as for study 1. Patient's satisfaction with body image and cosmesis is assessed at different time points pre- and postoperatively by means of validated cosmesis scales and Body Image Questionnaire. Postoperative pain and analgesia use will be registered as well as secondary outcome parameters as described above. A follow-up at 1, 3 and 6 month include evaluation of the scar and registration of port-site hernias and vaginal dehiscence or other complications. Interviews and diaries will include time of return to home and work, daily activities including sexuality The R-SSH is performed using da Vinci, Xi robotic system. One single port, diameter 2 cm is applied. Applying an additional assistant port is defined conversion of procedure The laparoscopy is performed using our standard equipment and 4 trocars, 5 mm each.
Socio-economical consequences of R-SSH versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy Study details in preparation
Sample size calculation was based a previous study on fast track hysterectomy, which showed a difference in return to work of 4 days. 62 women in each group is needed with standard deviation ±8 and a power of 80%. To include those not working, we calculated that with an expected visual analog pain score of 0.86 ±0.2 and 62 in each group the sample was sufficient to detect of difference of 0.1 in visual analog pain score with a power of 80%. All calculation are based on two-sided testing with alpha of 0.05.
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Finn F Lauszus, MD,PhD
- Phone Number: 28495640
- Email: finlau@rm.dk
Study Locations
-
-
-
Herning, Denmark, 7400
- Gynecology Dept. Herning Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- hysterectomy on benign indication,
- American Society of Anesthetists group 1 or 2,
- BMI less than 35 kg/m2
- uterine size less than 300 g estimated by ultrasound, using Ferraris formula.
Exclusion Criteria:
- adhesions
- prior extensive abdominal surgery
- prior midline incision,
- cutis laxa of abdomen surgery
- endometriosis
- more than 1 cesarean section
- malignant disease
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Robotic single-site hysterectomy
Robotic single-site hysterectomy is performed in this arm
|
Robotic assisted Periumbilical single incision hysterectomy
|
|
Active Comparator: Multiport Laparoscopy
Multiport Laparoscopic hysterectomy is performed in this other arm
|
Multiport laparoscopic hysterectomy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Return-to-work
Time Frame: up to six months after operation or until work is resumed, whichever came first
|
Time from operation to return work
|
up to six months after operation or until work is resumed, whichever came first
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain measured by subjective score
Time Frame: Visual analogue pain score first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and six months after operation
|
Visual analogue pain score with a minimum of '0' up to '10' on a 10 cm continious scale
|
Visual analogue pain score first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and six months after operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Finn F Lauszus, MD,PhD, Gynecology Department, Herning Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW, Kluivers KB. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.
- Sandberg EM, la Chapelle CF, van den Tweel MM, Schoones JW, Jansen FW. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May;295(5):1089-1103. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4323-y. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
- Yeung PP Jr, Bolden CR, Westreich D, Sobolewski C. Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.008.
- El Hachem L, Andikyan V, Mathews S, Friedman K, Poeran J, Shieh K, Geoghegan M, Gretz HF 3rd. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):760-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
- Golkar FC, Ross SB, Sperry S, Vice M, Luberice K, Donn N, Morton C, Hernandez JM, Rosemurgy AS. Patients' perceptions of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: the cosmetic effect. Am J Surg. 2012 Nov;204(5):751-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.07.026.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- R-SSH
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.