Histology Post-Endoscopic Eradication Therapy (EET)

December 11, 2017 updated by: Northwestern University

Optimizing Patient Outcomes Through Early Detection of Uncontrolled Acid Reflux After Endoscopic Therapy in Barrett's Esophagus

This study is looking at a cohort of patients who have undergone treatment for Barrett's Esophagus (BE) and who have experienced complete eradication of the disease. The aim of the proposed study is to evaluate the histologic features of the neosquamous epithelium (NSE) following complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) in patients undergoing routine surveillance biopsies and compare these data to a direct measure of reflux using 24hr pH impedance, to determine the correlation between histology and persistent reflux. These data will allow us to more accurately risk stratify patients for recurrence of BE following EET.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
65

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who have undergone EET and 24hr pH impedance testing as part of standard of care at Northwestern Memorial Hospital between 1/1/2009 and 12/31/2014 and who have enrolled in the Prospective Evaluation of Barrett's Esophagus database (NCT02634645).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - Patients who have undergone endoscopic eradication therapy and 24hr pH impedance testing as part of standard of care between 2009 and 2014.
  • - Individuals who have signed a consent to be part of the Prospective Evaluation of Barrett's Esophagus Study population.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children and teenagers), pregnant women and prisoners will be excluded from the study.
  • - Patient who were previously unable or unwilling to give consent to the Prospective Evaluation of Barrett's Esophagus Study will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite histologic score of neosquamous epithelium following endoscopic eradication therapy (EET)
Time Frame: 1 year

A composite histologic score made up of the following criteria:

  • Eosinophil infiltration (0: none, 1: scattered or focal, 2: diffuse or multifocal)
  • Dilated intercellular spaces (0: none, 0.5: intercellular spaces seen at 40x focal, 1: intercellular spaces seen at 40x diffuse, 1.5: intercellular spaces seen at 10x focal, 2: intercellular spaces seen at 10x diffuse)
  • Parakaratosis (0: absent, 2: present)
  • Ballooning degeneration (0: none, 1: focal, 2: extensive)
  • Basal cell hyperplasia (0: <15% of total thickness, 1: 15-33% of total thickness, 1.5: 33-66% of total thickness, 2: >66% of total thickness)
  • Columnar differentiation (0: no columnar mucosa present, 2: columnar mucosa adjacent to squamous)
  • Ulceration/erosion (0: absent, 1: present)

Total possible score: 13
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
24hr pH-impedance testing: percent acid reflux
Time Frame: 1 year
Percent acid reflux
1 year
24hr pH-impedance testing: baseline impedance
Time Frame: 1 year
Baseline impedance
1 year
24hr pH-impedance testing: Demeester score
Time Frame: 1 year
Demeester score
1 year
Correlation between histologic features and persistent reflux
Time Frame: 1 year
If participants with abnormal 24hr pH-impedance testing, as determined by outcomes 2, 3, and 4, have greater mean scores for histologic criteria evaluated in outcome 1.
1 year
Recurrence rate of intestinal metaplasia (Barrett's esophagus)
Time Frame: 1 year
Recurrence rate of intestinal metaplasia in the overall cohort and the cohort with abnormal 24hr pH-impedance testing
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Northwestern University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 2, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 5, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 5, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 15, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 11, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • STU00205592

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings