Air Leakage Under Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (SAS-leak-1)

June 30, 2020 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Retrospective Analysis of the Determinants of Air Leakage in a Population of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Treated With Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

The software embedded in recent continuous positive pressure devices enables the analysis of the level of leakage that occurs during treatment around the mask or from the mouth. However, there is no clear threshold defining when it would be appropriate to implement means for correcting these leaks. In addition, the calculation methods used to detect/measure leaks and the terminology used vary according to the manufacturers of continuous pressure devices, which also complicates the clinical interpretation of the leakage reports provided by the various devices.

In daily practice, when a patient complains of unintentional leakage, technicians adjust the mask, replace the nasal-mask by an oro-nasal mask or install a chinstrap. Nevertheless, those strategies are not always effective in reducing leakage or patient's complaints. A better understanding of the mechanisms beyond leak appearance for a given patient could lead to individualised leak-treatment solutions. Pressure level, mandibular behaviour, respiratory effort, sleep position or sleep stages may contribute to leak emergence.

A recent exploratory study has proposed a genuine analysis method of determining factors of unintentional-leaks using polysomnographic recordings in OSA patients treated with automatic Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (auto-CPAP). Based on the same methodology, the NOMICS company (Liège, Belgium) has developed a polygraphic device (Brizzy®) recording unintentional leakage during auto-CPAP treatment and providing an etiological analysis of unintentional-leaks via a software named APIOS.

Due to the innovative nature of the analysis, it appears necessary to validate it onto a population of OSA patients treated with auto-CPAP. Also, to our knowledge, there is no descriptive data of the distribution of the determinants of unintentional leaks in such a population. From this perspective, the investigators aim to retrospectively analyse some polygraphic recordings that have been performed with the Brizzy® on OSA patients treated with auto-CPAP.

The primary objective of this study is to identify and describe the determinants of unintentional leaks for a population of patients with OSA and treated with an auto-CPAP device

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The secondary objectives are:

  1. to evaluate the concordance of the determinants of leaks according to different leak thresholds (0 l/min ; 5l/min ; 10l/min : 20l/min).
  2. to describe any technical problems that arise in relation to the analysis of leaks in the study population.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

79

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Boujan sur Libron, France, 34760
        • Polyclinic Saint-Privat
      • Grenoble, France
        • University hospital of Grenoble
      • Montpellier, France
        • Hopital Arnaud de Villeneuve

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population corresponds to patients (all meeting eligibility criteria) with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome treated via continuous positive pressure and monitored according to usual practice with the latest Brizzy device.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sleep recordings from patients with OSA treated via auto-CPAP and monitored with Brizzy® device (including measures of non-intentional leaks) between June 1st and December 31th, 2017.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient opposes the usage of his/her data
  • Minors or adults under any kind of guardianship
  • Fixed pressure
  • Bilevel positive airway pressure devices
  • Adaptive servo-ventilation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
The study population

The study population corresponds to patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome treated via continuous positive pressure and monitored according to usual practice with the latest Brizzy device.

Intervention: Brizzy continuous positive pressure device

Patients are treated with the Brizzy continuous positive pressure device, including pneumotachograph.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mouth-opening odds ratio
Time Frame: day 0 (transversal study)
For each patient presenting with an unintentional leak, determination of odds ratios for mouth-opening.
day 0 (transversal study)
Auto-CPAP pressure level odds ratio
Time Frame: day 0 (transversal study)
For each patient presenting with an unintentional leak, determination of odds ratios for Auto-CPAP pressure level
day 0 (transversal study)
Sleep position odds ratio
Time Frame: day 0 (transversal study)
For each patient presenting with an unintentional leak, determination of odds ratios for sleep position
day 0 (transversal study)
Respiratory effort (increase in the Jawac signal > 0.3 mm) odds ratio
Time Frame: day 0 (transversal study)
For each patient presenting with an unintentional leak, determination of odds ratios respiratory effort
day 0 (transversal study)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Epworth scale score
Time Frame: day 0 (transversal study)
day 0 (transversal study)
Pichot scale
Time Frame: day 0 (transversal study)
day 0 (transversal study)
Occurrence of nasal obstruction
Time Frame: day 0 (transversal study)
day 0 (transversal study)
Occurrence of mouth dryness
Time Frame: day 0 (transversal study)
day 0 (transversal study)
Occurrence of nasal dryness
Time Frame: day 0 (transversal study)
day 0 (transversal study)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Type/brand of mask and device used
Time Frame: day 0 (transversal study)
day 0 (transversal study)
Presence of heated humidifier
Time Frame: day 0 (transversal study)
day 0 (transversal study)
Presence of chinstraps.
Time Frame: day 0 (transversal study)
day 0 (transversal study)
The Brizzy output
Time Frame: day 0 (transversal study)
day 0 (transversal study)
Mask pressure as measured by Brizzy
Time Frame: day 0 (transversal study)
day 0 (transversal study)
Presence/absence of technical problems that arise in relation to the analysis of leaks
Time Frame: day 0 (transversal study)
day 0 (transversal study)
Presence/absence of a comorbidity
Time Frame: day 0 (transversal study)
day 0 (transversal study)
Presence of a psychotropic treatment
Time Frame: day 0 (transversal study)
day 0 (transversal study)
Presence of a treatment of nasal problem
Time Frame: day 0 (transversal study)
day 0 (transversal study)
Anterior ORL surgery
Time Frame: day 0 (transversal study)
day 0 (transversal study)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Christian Borel, PhD, University Hospital, Grenoble
  • Study Director: Nicolas Molinari, PhD, University Hospital, Montpellier

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 20, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 20, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RECHMPL17_0429

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Brizzy continuous positive pressure device

Search Similar Trials