Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) After Adenotonsillectomy in Children

January 10, 2019 updated by: Ronald D. Chervin, M.D., M.S., University of Michigan

Sleep-Disordered Breathing and CPAP After Adenotonsillectomy in Children

Obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) affects 2-3% of children and may lead to problems with nighttime sleep and daytime behavior, learning, sleepiness, and mood. Adenotonsillectomy (AT) is the second most common surgical procedure in children. It is now performed more often for suspected SDB than for any other indication. However, recent studies indicate that many if not most children still have SDB after AT, and many still have learning or behavioral problems associated with SDB. The goals of this study are: (1) to assess the extent that behavior, cognition, and sleepiness in children can improve with Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment after AT, and (2) to identify which patients stand to gain most from post-operative assessment and treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) affects at least 2-3% of children and may have substantial adverse impact on behavior and cognition. Adenotonsillectomy (AT), the second most common surgical procedure in children, is now performed more often for suspected SDB than for any other indication. However, recent studies among an increasingly obese population now show something alarming: many if not most children still have SDB after AT, and many still suffer from residual neurobehavioral morbidity. Furthermore, the investigators' ongoing, 12-year, NIH-funded research has shown that standard preoperative polysomnographic measures of SDB do not consistently predict post-AT improvement in behavior and cognition. This may arise in part because many children after AT still have SDB, and because linear relationships between standard SDB measures and neurobehavioral morbidity may not exist. Even at subtle levels, SDB may promote significant neurobehavioral morbidity. Some have suggested that polysomnography may be more important after AT than before AT. However, in practice few children receive polysomnography before AT, and even fewer after AT, when continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) could still provide definitive relief from SDB. Preliminary data from our group suggest that CPAP after AT is well-tolerated by most children and may provide significant benefit. However, virtually no published evidence exists to address critical clinical questions: which children benefit most from CPAP after AT; what role can clinical symptoms or polysomnography play in that determination; and what neurobehavioral gains are achieved by CPAP after AT?

The investigators therefore will undertake a highly practical, clinical study with two main goals: (1) to assess the extent that behavior, cognition, and sleepiness in children can improve with CPAP after AT, and (2) to identify which patients stand to gain most from post-operative assessment and treatment. This research will use reversible SDB-related neurobehavioral morbidity as the criteria by which to judge the utility of clinical symptoms and polysomnography in identification of candidates for CPAP after AT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Children ages 5-12 years old,
  2. Scheduled for an adenotonsillectomy for treatment of sleep apnea,
  3. Child must provide assent, and
  4. Parent or legal guardian must be able to speak and read English, and agree to the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. No siblings of children already enrolled in the study,
  2. Children who expect to have another surgery (in addition to AT) during the period of participation in this study,
  3. Neurological, psychiatric, or medical conditions, or social factors that may affect test results, prevent children from returning for required study visits, or interfere with the study treatment, or
  4. Certain medications that affect sleepiness or alertness, for example:

    • Stimulants (such as Ritalin, Adderall, or Concerta),
    • Sleep aides (such as Melatonin, Ambien, or Ativan), or
    • Sedating medicines (such as Benadryl, Klonopin, Xanax, or Valerian).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CPAP treatment
Children randomized to this arm will receive 6 months of CPAP (or BPAP) treatment, beginning at approximately 4 months after AT, in addition to standard of care. For analysis purposes those children who were non-adherent (CPAP use <4 hours per night) vs. adherent (CPAP use at least 4 hours per night) will be analyzed separately.
6 months of treatment with PAP (CPAP or BPAP)
Other Names:
  • Continuous positive airway pressure device (CPAP)
  • Bi-level positive airway pressure device (BPAP)
  • Positive Airway Pressure device (PAP)
Other: No CPAP treatment
Children randomized to this comparison arm will not be treated with CPAP or BPAP, but will be followed for approximately 10 months after AT while receiving standard of care.
Children randomized to the comparison group will receive routine care
Other Names:
  • Control group
  • Comparison group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Behavioral Index After 6 Months of CPAP or No-CPAP
Time Frame: assessed as change from baseline to 6 months of CPAP therapy or no-CPAP
The sum of the T-scores of The Conners' Parent Rating Scales (CPRS-R:L, ADHD index) and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL, Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Problems) are used to construct the primary study outcome measure Behavioral Index. Behavioral index is a T score (adjusted for age and gender) with a range of "<10" to ">90" - where higher scores mean worse behavior and lower scores mean better behavior, so a negative change score represents an improvement in behavior. T-scores with a mean of 50 and SD of 10 are computed.
assessed as change from baseline to 6 months of CPAP therapy or no-CPAP

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Cognition as Shown by NIH Toolbox Composite Score
Time Frame: assessed as change from baseline to 6 months of CPAP therapy or no-CPAP
Scores are reported as standardized scores with a mean of 100 and SD of 15. Minimum value 40 and Maximum value 160. Higher scores are better
assessed as change from baseline to 6 months of CPAP therapy or no-CPAP
Change in Sleepiness as Measured by Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time Frame: assessed as change from baseline to 6 months of CPAP therapy or no-CPAP
Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores range from 0 to 24 where higher scores mean greater sleepiness.
assessed as change from baseline to 6 months of CPAP therapy or no-CPAP
Change in Sleepiness After AT as Measured by Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT)
Time Frame: assessed as change from baseline to 6 months of CPAP therapy or no-CPAP
Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) is an objective measure of sleepiness determined by measure of brain waves and other physiological signals over a 30 minute period. This is measured for five 30 minute periods across the day and average latency to sleep for each participant across those times were used to calculate the mean sleep latency. The score is measured in how quickly one would fall asleep, measured in minutes, so a negative number of minutes in the change score means that participants fell asleep more quickly than previously.
assessed as change from baseline to 6 months of CPAP therapy or no-CPAP
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by Peds QL
Time Frame: assessed as change from baseline to 6 months of CPAP therapy or no-CPAP
Peds-QL is a quality of life symptom measurement with a score range of 0 to 100. Higher scores are better quality of life
assessed as change from baseline to 6 months of CPAP therapy or no-CPAP
CPAP Adherence as Measured by Number of Participants Who Used the CPAP Consistently.
Time Frame: Starting at 4 months after AT and continuing through 10 months after AT
CPAP adherence data will be downloaded from CPAP machines. It is defined for this study as using the CPAP machine for at least an average of 4 hours per night during the last 60 days of the assignment.
Starting at 4 months after AT and continuing through 10 months after AT

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Cognition as Measured by Fluid Cognition Scores
Time Frame: assessed as change from baseline to 6 months of CPAP therapy or no-CPAP
Scores are reported as standardized scores with a mean of 100 and SD of 15. Minimum value 40, Maximum value 160. Higher scores are better
assessed as change from baseline to 6 months of CPAP therapy or no-CPAP
Change in Cognition After AT as Shown by Academic Achievement
Time Frame: assessed as change from baseline to 6 months of CPAP therapy or no-CPAP
Academic achievement mean score is a standardized score with a mean of 100 and SD 15. Minimum value 40 and Maximum value 160. Higher scores are better
assessed as change from baseline to 6 months of CPAP therapy or no-CPAP

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ronald D. Chervin, MD, MS, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 29, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

October 29, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 15, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 14, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sleep Apnea Syndromes

Clinical Trials on CPAP treatment

Subscribe