The Videolaryngoscopy in Small Infants (VISI)
The Videolaryngoscopy in Small Infants (VISI) Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Objectives:
- Primary Objective To compare the tracheal intubation (TI) first attempt success rate using VL vs. DL in children ≤ 12 months old.
- Secondary Objectives To compare the lowest oxygen saturation during tracheal intubation with VL vs. DL.
Study Design:
Prospective, randomized, multi-center parallel group trial
Setting/Participants:
This will be a multi-center study with a minimum of four participating centers. The target population will be children ≤ 12 months age scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.
Study Interventions and Measures:
The study intervention will be a 1:1 randomization to perform tracheal intubation with the Storz C-Mac Miller 1 (VL) or the conventional Miller laryngoscope (DL).
Main study outcome measures are as follows:
- The first intubation attempt success rate with each device
- The number of attempts for successful intubation with each device
- Complications associated with intubation
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Perth
-
Subiaco, Perth, Australia
- Princess Margaret Hospital for Children
-
-
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
- Boston Children's Hospital
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
- UT southwestern Medical Center
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98105
- Seattle Children's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria
- Males or females age 0 to <12 months.
- Scheduled for non-cardiac surgery or procedure lasting longer than 30 minutes under general anesthesia where oral endotracheal intubation will be performed by an anesthesiology clinician.
- Subject/Parental/guardian permission (informed consent).
Inclusion for clinician participants:
1) Pediatric anesthesia attending, pediatric anesthesia fellows, and anesthesia resident
Exclusion Criteria
- History of difficult intubation
- History with abnormal airway
- Predictive of difficult intubation upon physical examination
- Parents/guardians who, in the opinion of the investigator, may be unable to understand or give informed consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Video Laryngoscopy for endotracheal (ET) Placement
Device: Storz C-MAC Video Laryngoscope |
Tracheal intubation performed with the Storz C-Mac Video Laryngoscope
Tracheal Intubation performed with the Miller Blade
|
|
Active Comparator: Direct Laryngoscopy for ET Placement
Device: Miller Laryngoscope |
Tracheal intubation performed with the Storz C-Mac Video Laryngoscope
Tracheal Intubation performed with the Miller Blade
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Success in the First Attempt
Time Frame: at the time of intubation
|
comparing the tracheal intubation (TI) first attempt success rate using VL vs. DL
|
at the time of intubation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Hypoxia
Time Frame: At the time of intubation
|
Comparing the lowest oxygen saturation during tracheal intubation with VL vs. DL
|
At the time of intubation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: John Fiadjoe, MD, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Fiadjoe JE, Nishisaki A, Jagannathan N, Hunyady AI, Greenberg RS, Reynolds PI, Matuszczak ME, Rehman MA, Polaner DM, Szmuk P, Nadkarni VM, McGowan FX Jr, Litman RS, Kovatsis PG. Airway management complications in children with difficult tracheal intubation from the Pediatric Difficult Intubation (PeDI) registry: a prospective cohort analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Jan;4(1):37-48. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00508-1. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
- Sun H, Liu M, Lin Z, Jiang H, Niu Y, Wang H, Chen S. Comprehensive identification of 125 multifarious constituents in Shuang-huang-lian powder injection by HPLC-DAD-ESI-IT-TOF-MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2015 Nov 10;115:86-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
- Goto T, Gibo K, Hagiwara Y, Morita H, Brown DF, Brown CA 3rd, Hasegawa K; Japanese Emergency Medicine Network Investigators. Multiple failed intubation attempts are associated with decreased success rates on the first rescue intubation in the emergency department: a retrospective analysis of multicentre observational data. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Jan 16;23:5. doi: 10.1186/s13049-014-0085-8.
- Goto T, Watase H, Morita H, Nagai H, Brown CA 3rd, Brown DF, Hasegawa K; Japanese Emergency Medicine Network Investigators. Repeated attempts at tracheal intubation by a single intubator associated with decreased success rates in emergency departments: an analysis of a multicentre prospective observational study. Emerg Med J. 2015 Oct;32(10):781-6. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203473. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
- Sakles JC, Chiu S, Mosier J, Walker C, Stolz U. The importance of first pass success when performing orotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):71-8. doi: 10.1111/acem.12055.
- Mort TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg. 2004 Aug;99(2):607-13, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000122825.04923.15.
- Grunwell JR, Kamat PP, Miksa M, Krishna A, Walson K, Simon D, Krawiec C, Breuer R, Lee JH, Gradidge E, Tarquinio K, Shenoi A, Shults J, Nadkarni V, Nishisaki A; National Emergency Airway Registry for Children (NEAR4KIDS) and the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis (PALISI) Network. Trend and Outcomes of Video Laryngoscope Use Across PICUs. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug;18(8):741-749. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001175.
- Abdelgadir IS, Phillips RS, Singh D, Moncreiff MP, Lumsden JL. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in children (excluding neonates). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 24;5(5):CD011413. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011413.pub2.
- Lingappan K, Arnold JL, Shaw TL, Fernandes CJ, Pammi M. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 18;(2):CD009975. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009975.pub2.
- Souza Nd, Carvalho WB. [Complications of tracheal intubation in pediatrics]. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2009 Nov-Dec;55(6):646-50. Portuguese.
- Nouruzi-Sedeh P, Schumann M, Groeben H. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh blade versus GlideScope: success rate and time for endotracheal intubation in untrained medical personnel. Anesthesiology. 2009 Jan;110(1):32-7. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318190b6a7.
- Howard-Quijano KJ, Huang YM, Matevosian R, Kaplan MB, Steadman RH. Video-assisted instruction improves the success rate for tracheal intubation by novices. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Oct;101(4):568-72. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen211. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
- Garcia-Marcinkiewicz AG, Kovatsis PG, Hunyady AI, Olomu PN, Zhang B, Sathyamoorthy M, Gonzalez A, Kanmanthreddy S, Galvez JA, Franz AM, Peyton J, Park R, Kiss EE, Sommerfield D, Griffis H, Nishisaki A, von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Nadkarni VM, McGowan FX Jr, Fiadjoe JE; PeDI Collaborative investigators. First-attempt success rate of video laryngoscopy in small infants (VISI): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020 Dec 12;396(10266):1905-1913. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32532-0.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 17-014302
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.