Transverse Colostomy for Refractory Hemorrhagic Chronic Radiation Proctitis: a Prospective Cohort Study

July 11, 2019 updated by: Lei Wang, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

Transverse Colostomy for Refractory Hemorrhagic Chronic Radiation Proctitis With Moderate to Severe Anemia: a Prospective Cohort Study

Refractory rectal bleeding of chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) is still problematic and does not respond to medical treatments including reagents, endoscopic argon plasma coagulation (APC) or topical formalin. We proposed this prospective cohort study, to assess the efficacy and safety of colostomy in treating refractory hemorrhagic CRP with moderate to severe anemia, to provide higher-quality evidence of colostomy in these patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) is a common complication after radiotherapy of pelvic malignancies, accounting for 5%-20% of cases. Rectal bleeding is the most common symptom, which accounts for > 80% of CRP patients. Mild to moderate bleeding can be controlled by medical agents like sucralfate, endoscopic argon plasma coagulation (APC) or topical formalin. Severe and refractory bleeding is still problematic and refractory to these above medical treatments. Our previous retrospective study found that colostomy obtained a higher rate of bleeding remission (94% vs 12%) in 6 months, especially in control of transfusion-dependent bleeding (100% vs0%), when compared to conservative treatments.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510655
        • Recruiting
        • The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
        • Contact:
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510000
        • Recruiting
        • Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically diagnosed with pelvic malignancies, including gynecologic, prostate, or urinary cancers;
  • History of pelvic radiation;
  • No tumor recurrence or metastasis;
  • Refractory hemorrhagic CRP;
  • Time of rectal bleeding >6 months;
  • SOBS=3 points;
  • severe anemia （Hb≤7 g/dl）or transfusion history for CRP bleedings.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe complications of CRP, including deep ulcer or fistula, stricture, necrosis, refractory perianal pain;
  • Other hemorrhagic diseases, like III-IV degree hemorrhoids;
  • History of colon or rectum resection;
  • Intestinal obstruction and surgery needed;
  • with contraindications to general anaesthesia (ASA class 4 or 5);
  • pregnant or breast-feeding;
  • history of mental disorder.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: transverse colostomy
Diverting transverse colostomy were conducted under general or epidural anesthesia in the operating room. The transverse colon was pulled out through one 2*2cm incision. The omentum was dissected from transverse colon, and a double-cavity stoma of transverse colon was then created.
Procedure: Transverse colostomy
Transverse double-cavity colostomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
remission rate of rectal bleeding after colostomy
Time Frame: 6 mon after colostomy
retcal bleeding is assessed by soma scores
6 mon after colostomy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Remission rate of rectal bleeding
Time Frame: 1 year, 2years, 3 years
retcal bleeding is assessed by soma scores
1 year, 2years, 3 years
Rate of colostomy closure
Time Frame: 1 years, 1.5 years, 2 years
assess endoscopic findings before closure
1 years, 1.5 years, 2 years
Rate of severe CRP complications
Time Frame: 3 years
include transfusion, deep ulceration or fistula, stricture, and refractory perianal pain
3 years
endoscopic score
Time Frame: 1 year
Score of Vienna Rectoscopy Score (VRS)
1 year
endoscopic score
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years
Score of Rectal Telangiectasia Density
baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years
Quality of life by EORTC scores
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30),The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflect the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life construct. It incorporates five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), and a global health and quality-of-life scale.
baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years
Anorectal function outcomes
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years
by Wexner score including 5 items: incontinence of solid stool, watery stool, gas, necessary of nursing pads, change of living habit
baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years
Rate of colostomy complications
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years
such as prolapse, edema, necrosis, retraction.
baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lei Wang, Professor, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 20, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 11, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Colostomy-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

IPD is private information

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings