Mirabegron for Treatment of Overactive Bladder Symptoms in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

January 29, 2018 updated by: Seung-June Oh, Seoul National University Hospital

Mirabegron for Treatment of Overactive Bladder Symptoms in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: a Double-blind, Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to see the study drug, Mirabegron, is safe and effective in treating symptoms of Overactive Bladder in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is a randomized 1:1 placebo-controlled 12-week study of Mirabegron in 144 Parkinson's subjects the age of 40 to 80 with overactive bladder. Active drug will be Mirabegron 50mg daily. Subjects will be enrolled based on response to an overactive bladder questionnaire at visit 1. Enrolled subjects will have 3 study visits to the clinic as well as 1 phone visit.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
144

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Seung-June Oh, MD
  • Phone Number: +82-2-2072-2421
  • Email: sjo@snu.ac.kr

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Kyungpook National University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Hallym University Medical Center
        • Contact:
      • Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Severance Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject who signed a consent form approved from IRB(Institutional Review Board) or IEC(Independent Ethics Committee)
  • Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease by a neurologist
  • taking a Parkinson's medications stably during 4 weeks preceding screening
  • 40 Years to 80 Years, Male and Female
  • Patient has overactive bladder symptoms more than 4 weeks preceding screening.
  • OABSS questionnaires total score≥ 3 and entries of urinary urgency score≥ 2
  • The expanded disability status scale ≤ 7

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who have any intervention and operation which can influence on study such as bladder augmentation, vesical sphincter, artificial sphincter, intravesical botulinum toxin treatment etc.
  • Use of indwelling catheter or self-catheterization
  • acute urinary tract infection or urolithiasis at screening
  • History of chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy, or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs
  • total volume urine > 3L a day
  • Screening post-void residual > 200ml
  • Nonpharmacological therapy within the previous 4 weeks of screening
  • screening blood pressure >180 systolic or 110 diastolic
  • subjects who have orthostatic hypotension, syncope, hypokalemia, or angle-closure glaucoma
  • Clinically Significant ECG in recent year
  • Screening estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 29, AST ( aspartate aminotransferase ) or ALT ( alanine aminotransferase ) > 2x upper limit of normal, γ-GT(gamma-glutamyl transferase) > 3xULN
  • take following medication additionally or change the dose: previous 4weeks of screening to end of the study (tamsulosin/silodosin/terazosin, baclofen, diazepam, amitriptyline, DDAVP/desmopressin) previous 12weeks of screening to end of the study (finasteride, dutasteride)
  • Use β2- adrenoreceptor agonist, loop diuretic, CYP 3A4 inducer, CYP 2D6 narrow therapeutic index, CYP 3A4 inhibitor, antifungal agent, antiarrhythmic agent
  • History of allergy to Mirabegron and beta-adrenergic receptor
  • Use of one of the anti-cholinergic bladder medications such as Propiverine / tolterodine / trospium / darifenacin / solifenacin / fesoterodine and mirabegron within 14 days of the screening visit. Subjects who have used one of these medications in the past but discontinued it at least 14 days prior to the screening visit can be enrolled.
  • women who have potential to become pregnant during the course of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Mirabegron
1:1 randomization to receive Mirabegron 50mg daily or placebo at visit 2. At visit 4 all subjects will receive Mirabegron 50mg.
Drug: Mirabegron
Mirabegron 50mg po daily for 12 weeks to Active Comparator group, and 4 weeks(from visit 4 to visit 5) to Placebo comparator group.
Other Names:
  • Betmiga PR 50mg
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
1:1 randomization to receive Mirabegron 50mg daily or placebo at visit 2. At visit 4 all subjects will receive Mirabegron 50mg.
Drug: Placebo
Placebo po daily for 8 weeks to Placebo comparator group.
Other Names:
  • sugar pill

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the total score of Overactive Bladder Symptom Scale(OABSS)
Time Frame: Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the total score of Overactive Bladder Symptom Scale(OABSS) from baseline(Visit 2) to Visit 4
Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the total score of OABSS(Overactive Bladder Symptom Scale)
Time Frame: Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the total score of OABSS, Visit 3, Visit 4 and Visit 5
Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the total score of IPSS(International Prostate Symptom Score)
Time Frame: Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the total score of IPSS and bothersome score, Visit 3, Visit 4 and Visit 5
Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the total score of OAB-q short form
Time Frame: Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the total score of OAB-q short form,Visit 3, Visit 4 and Visit 5
Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the total score of PPBC(Patient Perception of Bladder Condition)
Time Frame: Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the total score of PPBC, Visit 3, Visit 4 and Visit 5
Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the total score of TSQ (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire)
Time Frame: Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the total score of TSQ, Visit 3, Visit 4 and Visit 5
Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the total score of GRA (Global Response Assessment)
Time Frame: Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the total score of GRA, Visit 3, Visit 4 and Visit 5
Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the score of BSW (Benefit, Satisfaction and Willingness to Continue Questions)
Time Frame: Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the score of BSW, Visit 4 and Visit 5
Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the Mean Frequent Urination
Time Frame: Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the Mean Frequent Urination, Visit 3 and Visit 4
Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the Mean number of Urinary urgency
Time Frame: Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the Mean number of Urinary urgency, Visit 3 and Visit 4
Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the Mean number of Urinary incontinence
Time Frame: Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)
Change in the Mean number of Urinary incontinence, Visit 3 and Visit 4
Baseline(Visit 2 : 0 week), Visit 3(3-5 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 4(6-10 weeks post Visit 2), Visit 5(10-14 weeks post Visit 2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Seoul National University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Seung-June Oh, MD, Seoul National University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 17, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 16, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 25, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 30, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 29, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PaDOMi Study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overactive Bladder

Clinical Trials on Mirabegron

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings