Trans-inguinal Pre-peritoneal Hernioplasty Versus Lichtnestein's Technique in Inguinal Hernia Repair (TIPP)
Trans-inguinal Pre-peritoneal (TIPP) Hernioplasty Versus Lichtnestein's Technique in Inguinal Hernia Repair
Mesh repair of inguinal hernia is the most common operation performed on general surgical patients. Approximately 20 million groin hernioplasties are performed each year worldwide. Countless studies have been reported in the medical literature in attempts to improve the overall outcomes following hernia operations and, due to this fact, the procedure has evolved immensely, especially over the last few decades. Recurrence of inguinal hernia was initially a significant problem. Lichtenstein repair (LR), recurrence rate has consistently been reported as low as 1-4%[2], a drop from up to 10%. But increased incidence of chronic groin pain following LR.
Transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) inguinal hernia repair with soft mesh has been reported as a safe anterior approach with a preperitoneal mesh position .
Theoretically, TIPP repair may be associated with lesser chronic postoperative pain than Lichtenstein's technique due to the placement of mesh in the preperitoneal space to avoid direct regional nerves dissection and their exposure to bio-reactive synthetic mesh. The placement of mesh in this plane without using any suture for fixation and lack of mesh exposure to regional nerves was assumed to result in the reduced risk of developing chronic groin pain. So aim of our study to prove less hospital stay and complication and cost effectiveness for preperitoneal meshplasty
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study is a prospective randomized study including all Patients with unilateral non complicated inguinal hernia who will undergo hernioplasty in surgery department at AUH during the period from 3- 2018 to 6- 2020
Methodology:
Patients will be classified into two groups according to the surgical procedure performed as follows:
- Group A: Patients undergoing TIPP hernioplasty
- Group B: Patients undergoing lichtnestein's technique hernioplasty
Sample size:15 patients for each group.
D) Exclusion criteria:
- Patients who were unfit for operation.
- Patients with bilateral or recurrent inguinal hernia
- Patients aged below 18 years,
- Patients undergoing emergency hernia repairs
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: mohamad hamdy, MBBS
- Phone Number: 01028086209
- Email: mohamdy.mh@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: faculty of medicine - assiut university faculty of medicine - assiut university
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- . Patients with unilateral non complicated inguinal hernia who will undergo hernioplasty in surgery department at AUH
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who were unfit for operation.
- Patients with bilateral or recurrent inguinal hernia
- Patients aged below 18 years,
- Patients undergoing emergency hernia repairs
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: group A
Patients undergoing trans-inguinal pre-peritoneal (TIPP) hernioplasty
|
patients were catheterised pre-operatively, to prevent any injury to the bladder and aid in preperitoneal dissection. The catheter was removed after 48 hours post-operatively. Incision of TIPP is same as that of Lichtenstein technique . After dissection of the sac, the transversalis is fascia is incised to enter the preperitoneal space. The preperitoneal space is developed by dissection with index finger. The space extends from rectus muscle medially, arcuate line cranially, a little beyond the anterior superior iliac spine over the psoas muscle laterally and the lilipubic tract caudally. A 15 cm x 15 cm polypropylene mesh, cut into dimension 15 cm x 12 cm, the inferior medial angle of the mesh is trimmed in a semicircular fashion to prevent trauma to the bladder neck. The mesh is placed in the preperitoneal space and anchored to the Cooper's ligament with a single 2-0 interrupted prolene suture
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: group B
Patients undergoing lichtnestein's hernioplasty
|
incision 1 cm above and parallel to inguinal ligament,Opening subcutaneous fat ,Opening Scarpa fascia to external oblique aponeurosis ,visualization of external ring and lower border of the inguinal ligament,Opening deep fascia of the thigh,checking for a femoral hernia ,Division of external oblique aponeurosis from external ring laterally for 5 cm, safeguarding ilioinguinal nerve ,Mobilization of superior and inferior flaps of external oblique aponeurosis exposing underlying structures ,Mobilization of spermatic cord along with the cremaster, including (ilioinguinal ,genitofemoral) nerves, and spermatic vessels; all of these structures may be encircled in a tape ,Opening of the coverings of spermatic cord, identification and isolation of the hernia sac ,Inversion, division, resection, or ligation of the sac ,Placement and fixation of mesh to edges of the defect or weakness in the posterior wall of inguinal canal creating artificial internal ring,Closure
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
comparison between the 2 techniques regarding presence and duration of post-operative chronic pain
Time Frame: visits will be within 6 months post operative
|
post operative clinical examination for assessment of the presence and duration of chronic pain
|
visits will be within 6 months post operative
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of hospital stay post operative
Time Frame: first week post operative
|
comparison between the two techniques concerning Duration of hospital stay post operation after each procedure
|
first week post operative
|
|
presence of any wound complication by examining the wound
Time Frame: first 2 weeks post operative
|
comparison between the two techniques concerning presence of any wound complications by wound examination
|
first 2 weeks post operative
|
|
recurrence rate
Time Frame: 6 to 12 month post operative
|
comparison between the two techniques concerning recurrence rate of inguinal hernia
|
6 to 12 month post operative
|
|
operation time
Time Frame: intra-operative
|
comparison between the two techniques regarding operative time
|
intra-operative
|
|
time needed for the patient to return to work
Time Frame: 1 month post operative
|
comparison between the two techniques regarding needed time to return to work
|
1 month post operative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009 Aug;13(4):343-403. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
- Cheek CM, Black NA, Devlin HB, Kingsnorth AN, Taylor RS, Watkin DF. Groin hernia surgery: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1998;80 Suppl 1:S1-80.
- Heikkinen T, Bringman S, Ohtonen P, Kunelius P, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A. Five-year outcome of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernioplasties. Surg Endosc. 2004 Mar;18(3):518-22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9119-4. Epub 2004 Jan 23.
- Vironen J, Nieminen J, Eklund A, Paavolainen P. Randomized clinical trial of Lichtenstein patch or Prolene Hernia System for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2006 Jan;93(1):33-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5235.
- Gilbert AI, Felton LL. Infection in inguinal hernia repair considering biomaterials and antibiotics. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 Aug;177(2):126-30. Erratum In: Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993 Nov;177(5):528.
- Awad SS, Fagan SP. Current approaches to inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2004 Dec;188(6A Suppl):9S-16S. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.09.007.
- Chung L, Norrie J, O'Dwyer PJ. Long-term follow-up of patients with a painless inguinal hernia from a randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2011 Apr;98(4):596-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7355. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- inguinal hernia
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Clinical examination will be undertaken immediately post-operative looking for any wound complication or scrotal collection .
Clinical examination will be undertaken at 1 , 3 ,6 months post-operative looking for :-
- Wound complication
- Scrotal collection
- Chronic Pain
- Recurrence
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Inguinal Hernia
-
NCT06023394CompletedInguinal Hernia | Inguinal Hernia, Indirect | Inguinal Hernia Unilateral | Inguinal Hernia Bilateral
-
NCT03678272CompletedInguinal Hernia | Inguinal Hernia Repair | Open Inguinal Hernia
-
NCT01350830CompletedIndirect Inguinal Hernia | Direct Inguinal Hernia
-
NCT07056244Recruiting
-
NCT04785430Enrolling by invitationInguinal Hernia | Strangulated Inguinal Hernia | Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia
-
NCT06660550RecruitingCongenital Inguinal Hernia
-
NCT07067281Active, not recruiting
-
NCT06712212Enrolling by invitationInguinal Hernia | Inguinal Hernia Repair
-
NCT01622712Completed
-
NCT05251350CompletedIncarcerated Inguinal Hernia
Clinical Trials on Trans-inguinal Pre-peritoneal Hernioplasty
-
NCT04437784CompletedBilateral Inguinal Hernia
-
NCT07108972Active, not recruitingLaparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
-
NCT01090284Unknown
-
NCT05423574Completed
-
NCT06786702RecruitingInguinal Hernia | Femoral Hernia | Obturator Hernia
-
NCT02197585Completed
-
NCT01830452UnknownHernia, Inguinal | Unilateral Inguinal Hernia
-
NCT03052023Completed
-
NCT00580177Completed
-
NCT07618884RecruitingInguinal Hernia | Inguinal Hernia Repair