Olive Oil and Soybean 1 Oil Based Intravenous Lipid Emulsions, Liver Chemistry and Clinical Outcomes

February 15, 2018 updated by: Maitreyi Raman, University of Calgary

Olive Oil and Soybean 1 Oil Based Intravenous Lipid Emulsions, Liver Biochemistry and Clinical Outcomes

Background: Intravenous lipid emulsions (IVLE) are an essential component of parenteral nutrition (PN). Omega-6 reducing strategies may improve outcomes, including reduced PN associated liver disease.

Objective: The primary objective was to compare serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), among surgical and medical patients provided with either Intralipid or Clinoleic lipid emulsions.

Design: In this quasi-experimental study the medical records of surgical and medical adult patients were reviewed from 3 Canadian hospitals that received PN with either soybean oil (Intralipid) or predominantly olive oil (Clinoleic) based lipid emulsions for at least 7 consecutive days.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

A few small studies have shown that a predominantly olive oil based IVLE is well tolerated and safe, however the clinical relevance of this IVLE is uncertain as no clear benefit in outcomes has been observed in small randomized clinical trials. Given the limited data available for the adult population reporting on the experience with olive oil based IVLE, we designed a quasi-experimental study to review our experience with Clinoleic compared to Intralipid. The primary objective was to compare the impact of Intralipid and Clinoleic IVLE on serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), pre-PN to after one week of PN (i.e. between day 8 to 16 post-PN initiation), while controlling for the ordered lipid dosing. Secondary objectives were to assess if there were differences between the IVLEs on the remaining liver function tests, lipid dosing, incidence of infectious complications, length of stay in hospital and 30- day mortality.

This retrospective quasi-experimental chart review was conducted in 3 tertiary care hospitals in Calgary, AB between July 01, 2012 to June 30, 2013 and July 01, 2014 to June 30, 2015. Standard soybean oil-based therapy, Intralipid was the only available IVLE in Calgary, AB until July 2013, at which time predominantly olive oil Clinoleic was approved as an alternative in the hospital formulary, accounting for the dates chosen for the study. Ethics approval from the Conjoint Health Research and Ethics Board at the University of Calgary was obtained prior to the initiation of the study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
206

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Study patients included adult patients (> 18 years) admitted to hospital who received PN with Intralipid or Clinoleic IVLEs for at least 7 consecutive days

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • admitted to hospital who received PN with Intralipid or Clinoleic IVLEs for at least 7 consecutive days.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • baseline liver disease
  • home PN prior to admission
  • ALP and total bilirubin (TB) not available within 3 days prior to PN start as well as between days 8 to 16 post PN start
  • receipt of Diprivan 1%® (Propofol 116 - AstraZeneca Canada Inc., Mississauga, Canada) during PN support period
  • enteral nutrition providing greater than 600 Kcal daily for longer than half of time period on PN
  • oral intake of greater than 50% of hospital meal tray contents for longer than half of the PN support time period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intralipid
Standard soybean oil-based therapy
Clinoleic
Olive oil based therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum ALP Level
Time Frame: 8 to 16 days after PN initiation
Difference between Intralipid and Clinoleic groups
8 to 16 days after PN initiation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum ALT
Time Frame: 8 to 16 days after PN initiation
Difference between Intralipid and Clinoleic groups
8 to 16 days after PN initiation
Serum GGT
Time Frame: 8 to 16 days after PN initiation
Difference between Intralipid and Clinoleic groups
8 to 16 days after PN initiation
Serum TB
Time Frame: 8 to 16 days after PN initiation
Difference between Intralipid and Clinoleic groups
8 to 16 days after PN initiation
Serum BD
Time Frame: 8 to 16 days after PN initiation
Difference between Intralipid and Clinoleic groups
8 to 16 days after PN initiation
Serum TG
Time Frame: 8 to 16 days after PN initiation
Difference between Intralipid and Clinoleic groups
8 to 16 days after PN initiation
IVLE prescriptions dosing
Time Frame: Day 3 to 16 after PN initiation
Difference between Intralipid and Clinoleic groups
Day 3 to 16 after PN initiation
All cause mortality
Time Frame: By 30 days after PN initiation
Difference between Intralipid and Clinoleic groups
By 30 days after PN initiation
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: During PN Period
Difference between Intralipid and Clinoleic groups
During PN Period
Infectious complications incidence
Time Frame: During PN Period
Difference between Intralipid and Clinoleic groups
During PN Period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Calgary

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Maitreyi Raman, University of Calgary

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 10, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 15, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 22, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 22, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 15, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AJCN Raman

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parenteral Nutrition Associated Liver Disease

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings