Compassion Meditation for Cancer Survivor-Caregiver Dyads

February 22, 2022 updated by: Thaddeus Pace

Compassion Meditation for Cancer Survivor-Caregiver Dyads: Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of Cognitively-Based Compassion Training (CBCT®) for Solid Tumor Cancer Survivors and Their Informal Caregivers

Survivors of solid tumor cancers and their informal caregivers (family, friends) experience impairments in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) including disruptions in psychological, physical, social, and spiritual well-being. Our prior work demonstrates that impairments in depression, anxiety, fatigue, and negative affect experienced by cancer survivors across time are interdependent those experienced by their informal caregivers. These findings suggest that interventions directed simultaneously toward both members of the cancer survivor-caregiver dyad may be especially impactful in improving HRQOL in cancer survivors and informal caregivers. Although a number of interventions have been developed and tested to support the survivor or the caregiver, few have attempted to simultaneously intervene with both to improve HRQOL within the collective survivor-caregiver dyad. CBCT®, Cognitively-Based Compassion Training (already piloted by members of this team with breast cancer survivors, is an 8-week manualized meditation-based program that starts with attention and mindfulness training and builds to contemplation about compassion for the self and others. The proposed pilot feasibility study builds upon this work to intervene with caregivers in addition to survivors of solid tumor cancers. The major aim of the proposed project is to test the feasibility and acceptability of CBCT® for survivors of solid tumor cancer and their informal caregivers after the end of cancer treatment. The project will also determine in a preliminary manner whether or not CBCT® (compared to a cancer health education [CHE] comparison group) has a positive impact on different measures of HRQOL (e.g. features of depression and anxiety, fatigue, social isolation), stress-related biomarkers of inflammation and cortisol, and assessments related to healthcare utilization.

IMPORTANT READER NOTE: ==> A prior version of this study protocol on clinicaltrials.gov incorrectly stated information about interpretation of scores of the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8). ==> Individuals interested in using the MMAS-8 are directed to https://morisky.org for information about the scale, as well as for licensing and other requirements for using the MMAS-8 in their research or clinical practice. Dr. Pace and his colleagues sincerely regret any incorrect information posted previously about the MMAS-8 on this clinicaltrials.gov trial website.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The overarching purpose of this research is to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of Cognitively-Based Compassion Training (CBCT®) compared to a cancer health education (CHE) attention on dimensions of health-related quality of life (HRQOL), biomarkers of inflammation and diurnal cortisol rhythm, and healthcare utilization-related endpoints including healthcare-related patient activation. To address this goal the study will be conducted to address four specific aims:

Aim 1: To obtain evidence of preliminary efficacy of CBCT® versus CHE for survivors of solid tumor cancer and their informal caregivers to improve health-related quality of life outcomes. The objective of this aim is to estimate effect sizes for the differences between CBCT® and CHE at weeks 9 and 13 on HRQOL-related outcomes including psychological (depression*, anxiety, positive affect), physical (fatigue), social (empathy, feelings of social connection/isolation, dyadic function), and spiritual (self-compassion) domain as well as global well-being. The noted endpoint (*) is considered primary, and the others are secondary. We predict that CBCT® will result in better primary and secondary outcomes than CHE at weeks 9 and 13 (Study Hypothesis 2).

Aim 2: To obtain preliminary evidence of efficacy of CBCT® versus CHE for survivors of solid tumor cancer and their informal caregivers to influence stress-related biomarkers of inflammation and diurnal cortisol rhythm. The objective of this aim is to estimate group differences at weeks 9 and 13 on stress-related biomarkers of inflammation (plasma IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α), as well as diurnal saliva cortisol rhythm in survivor-caregiver dyads randomized to CBCT® compared to survivor-caregiver dyads randomized to CHE. For this aim we predict that CBCT® will result in lower proinflammatory cytokines (decreased IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α) than CHE at weeks 9 and 13 (Study Hypothesis 3). We also predict that CBCT® will result in steeper slope (i.e. more dynamic diurnal cortisol rhythm) than CHE at weeks 9 and 13 (Study Hypothesis 4).

Aim 3: To obtain preliminary evidence of efficacy of CBCT® versus CHE for survivors of solid tumor cancer and their informal caregivers to improve health care utilization and patient activation in both survivors of solid tumor cancers and their informal caregivers over 13 weeks of the study. The objective of this aim is to estimate effect sizes for the differences between CBCT® and CHE at weeks 9 and 13 on health care utilization (i.e. keeping appointments, use of preventive services, hospitalizations, and use of urgent care or emergency department services), and patient activation (i.e. motivation, knowledge, skills and confidence in managing personal health). For this aim, we predict that CBCT® will result in better healthcare utilization (lower hospitalizations, use of urgent care or emergency department services, greater keeping of the appointments and use of preventive services), and greater patient activation than CHE over weeks 1-9 and 10-13 of the study (Study Hypothesis 5).

Aim 4: To explore the interdependence of solid tumor cancer survivor and informal caregiver health-related quality of life from before to after CBCT®. The objective of this aim is to determine the degree to which HRQOL measures, biomarkers of inflammation, or diurnal cortisol rhythm in survivors predict the corresponding outcomes in caregivers (and vice-versa).

Over the course of the study we will randomize 20 cancer survivor-caregiver dyads to CBCT®, and 20 dyads to the CHE attention group. We will conduct the study in several cohorts, with 4-10 dyads randomized to CBCT® and 4-10 dyads randomized with CHE in each cohort. The research procedures are elaborated below in chronological order of when they will occur for each study cohort. The study will consist of four major phases after recruitment/ screening/ consent:

  1. Baseline (pre-intervention) assessments
  2. Intervention phase
  3. 9-week (post-intervention) assessments
  4. 3-month (post intervention) assessments

Assessments - Baseline (pre-intervention)

After successful recruitment, screening, and consent we will invite solid tumor cancer survivor-informal caregiver dyads to the College of Nursing for the baseline assessment. Shortly after arrival blood will be collected from participants before starting self-report questionnaires. Blood will be drawn in order to obtain plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Blood (2 X 7 milliliters) will be collected by venipuncture into EDTA-coated vacutainer tubes by the (TBA) study phlebotomist, and then immediately processed to obtain plasma or PBMCs.

After blood sampling at the baseline assessment is complete we will next ask survivor-caregiver dyads to complete self-report assessments. Self-report instruments to be completed will assess different dimensions of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and healthcare adherence/ utilization.

Interventions

Within 2 weeks of the baseline assessment study participants will begin either 8 weeks of CBCT® or 8 weeks of CHE, depending on randomization. Study group will be revealed to study participants and study staff after the completion of the baseline assessment.

Upon randomization to either the CBCT® or CHE groups participants will be given a booklet, "Survivorship and Surveillance Guidelines", and another booklet, "Healthy Behaviors for a Healthier Life." Although these booklets will not be referred to directly throughout CBCT® or CHE, participants will be encouraged review them and ask questions about the content of these booklets throughout the study. Participants with questions after reviewing these booklets will be referred to Dr. Badger, clinical co-I. These booklets are being included because they may have an indirect effect on measures of health care adherence/ utilization in both the CBCT® and CHE groups.

Assessments - 9 weeks

Within a week of concluding the study interventions we will schedule all survivor-caregiver dyads to return to the College of Nursing for the 9-week assessment. The 9-week assessment will mirror the baseline assessment except for the healthcare utilization questionnaire, which will use an 9-week version of this questionnaire.

Assessments - 3 months

About 4 weeks later we will have all survivor-caregiver dyads visit the College of Nursing for the final, 3-month assessment time point. As with the 8-week assessment, this visit will mirror the baseline assessment except for a different healthcare utilization questionnaire, which will use a 3-month version of this questionnaire.

IMPORTANT READER NOTE: ==> A prior version of this study protocol on clinicaltrials.gov incorrectly stated information about interpretation of scores of the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8). ==> Individuals interested in using the MMAS-8 are directed to https://morisky.org for information about the scale, as well as for licensing and other requirements for using the MMAS-8 in their research or clinical practice. Dr. Pace and his colleagues sincerely regret any incorrect information posted previously about the MMAS-8 on this clinicaltrials.gov trial website.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
82

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85721
        • University of Arizona

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Cancer survivor inclusion criteria: 1) age 21 or older, 2) have a solid tumor cancer diagnosis, 3) have completed treatments (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy) except for hormonal therapies (e.g. aromatase inhibitors, androgen suppression therapy) a minimum of 3 months and a maximum of 10 years before starting CBCT® or CHE, 4) able to speak and understand English, and 5) able to travel to a centralized location to attend CBCT® or attention control classes.

Informal caregiver inclusion criteria will be: 1) named by the cancer survivor, 2) age 21 or older, 3) able to speak and understand English, 4) cognitively oriented in time, place, and person, and 5) able to travel to a centralized location to attend intervention classes with their solid tumor cancer survivor. Informal caregivers will be excluded if they have ongoing or past regular compassion meditation experience in the last 4 years.

In addition to these criteria, either the cancer survivor or the informal caregiver must report at least mild anxiety (PROMIS anxiety 4-item raw score > 6) and/ or mild depressive symptoms (PROMIS anxiety 4-item raw score > 6).

Exclusion Criteria:

Cancer survivor exclusionary factors: 1) diagnosis of major mental illness, 2) nursing home resident, and 3) have ongoing or past regular compassion meditation experience in the last 4 years (i.e. more than two compassion meditation session [completed or attempted] per year, either with a group or individually).

Informal caregiver exclusionary factors: 1) diagnosis of major mental illness, 2) nursing home resident, and 3) have ongoing or past regular compassion meditation experience in the last 4 years (i.e. more than two compassion meditation session [completed or attempted] per year, either with a group or individually).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Cognitively-Based Compassion Training
Cancer survivors and their informal caregivers (family and close friends), one of whom has at least mild depression and/or anxiety features (determined by PROMIS Depression 4a and PROMIS Anxiety 4a, respectively) who are randomized to CBCT®.
Behavioral: Cognitively-Based Compassion Training
CBCT® was designed at Emory University by Lobsang Tenzin Negi. CBCT® is a secular adaptation of techniques derived from traditional Tibetan Buddhist methods for cultivating compassion known as lo-jong. Over the course of 8 weeks there will a total of 8 CBCT® sessions, one session per week, led by the CBCT® instructor. Dyads will attend the weekly CBCT® classes together. Each weekly session will last for 90 minutes and will begin with brief meditation to focus attention. The instructor will then articulate content and goals of the current week, after which a group discussion led by the instructor will take place. A session will end with a 20-30 minute meditation. Dyads will be encouraged to practice a minimum of 10 minutes per day at home, and together as a dyad if possible.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: CHE (Cancer Health Education)
Cancer survivors and their informal caregivers (family and close friends), one of whom has at least mild depression and/or anxiety features (determined by PROMIS Depression 4a and PROMIS Anxiety 4a, respectively) who are randomized to CHE.
Behavioral: CHE (Cancer Health Education)
The cancer health education (CHE) intervention is an adaptation of the in-person program called Health Discussion, a protocol used by our group previously. The CHE will focus on relevant topics to health and cancer including 1) cancer advocacy, 2) health and cancer biology, 3) nutrition, 4) lifestyle interventions such as physical activity and goals for physical activity, 5) the importance of good sleep, 6) the impact of stress, and 7) mental health and social support. CHE will also discuss current events related to cancer. Over the course of 8 weeks there will be a total of 8 sessions, one session per week. Each session will last for approximately 90 minutes.
Other Names:
  • Cancer Health Education

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in depression features
Time Frame: change from baseline depression score at 9 weeks
The difference in the change in depression features between the intervention arms from before to immediately after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the PROMIS-short form 8a depression scale.
change from baseline depression score at 9 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in negative affect
Time Frame: change from baseline 10-item Positive and Negative Affect Schedule score at 9 weeks
Change in negative effect from from before to immediately after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the 10-item Positive and Negative Affect Schedule.
change from baseline 10-item Positive and Negative Affect Schedule score at 9 weeks
change in negative affect
Time Frame: change from baseline 10-item Positive and Negative Affect Schedule score at 3 months
Change in negative effect from from before to one month after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the 10-item Positive and Negative Affect Schedule.
change from baseline 10-item Positive and Negative Affect Schedule score at 3 months
change in dyadic function
Time Frame: change from baseline Relationship Assessment Scale score at 9 weeks
Change in dyadic function from from before to immediately after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the Relationship Assessment Scale. This 7-item scale is designed to measure general relationship satisfaction. Respondents answer each item using a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (low satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction). Higher total scores indicate higher relationship satisfaction. The range of scores is from 7 to 35.
change from baseline Relationship Assessment Scale score at 9 weeks
change in dyadic function
Time Frame: change from baseline Relationship Assessment Scale score at 3 months
Change in dyadic function from from before to one month after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the Relationship Assessment Scale. This 7-item scale is designed to measure general relationship satisfaction. Respondents answer each item using a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (low satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction). Higher total scores indicate higher relationship satisfaction. The range of scores is from 7 to 35.
change from baseline Relationship Assessment Scale score at 3 months
change in self-compassion
Time Frame: change from baseline Self-Compassion Scale score at 9 weeks
Change in self-compassion from from before to immediately after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the Neff Self-Compassion Scale. This 26-item scale is designed to assess compassion for the self. Subscale scores are computed by calculating the mean of subscale item responses. To compute a total self-compassion score, reverse score the negative subscale items before calculating subscale means - self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification (i.e., 1 = 5, 2 = 4, 3 = 3. 4 = 2, 5 = 1) - then compute a grand mean of all six subscale means. Researchers can choose to analyze their data either by using individual sub-scale sores or by using a total score.
change from baseline Self-Compassion Scale score at 9 weeks
change in self-compassion
Time Frame: change from baseline Self-Compassion Scale score at 3 months
Change in self-compassion from from before to one month after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the Neff Self-Compassion Scale. This 26-item scale is designed to assess compassion for the self. Subscale scores are computed by calculating the mean of subscale item responses. To compute a total self-compassion score, reverse score the negative subscale items before calculating subscale means - self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification (i.e., 1 = 5, 2 = 4, 3 = 3. 4 = 2, 5 = 1) - then compute a grand mean of all six subscale means. Researchers can choose to analyze their data either by using individual sub-scale sores or by using a total score.
change from baseline Self-Compassion Scale score at 3 months
change in global well-being
Time Frame: change from baseline Quality of Life Index score at 9 weeks
Change in global well-being from from before to immediately after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the Quality of Life Index.
change from baseline Quality of Life Index score at 9 weeks
change in global well-being
Time Frame: change from baseline Quality of Life Index score at 3 months
Change in global well-being from from before to one month after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the Quality of Life Index.
change from baseline Quality of Life Index score at 3 months
change in inflammatory biomarkers
Time Frame: change from baseline inflammation markers at 9 weeks
Change in systemic inflammation from before to immediately after the 8-week interventions will be measured with plasma interleukin [IL]-6, IL-1 beta, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- alpha.
change from baseline inflammation markers at 9 weeks
change in inflammatory biomarkers
Time Frame: change from baseline inflammation markers at 3 months
Change in systemic inflammation from before to one month after the 8-week interventions will be measured with plasma interleukin [IL]-6, IL-1 beta, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- alpha.
change from baseline inflammation markers at 3 months
change in diurnal saliva cortisol rhythm
Time Frame: change from baseline diurnal saliva cortisol rhythm at 9 weeks
Change in diurnal cortisol rhythm from from before to immediately after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the concentrations of cortisol in saliva collected in the morning shortly after waking and in the evening about 2 hours before bedtime.
change from baseline diurnal saliva cortisol rhythm at 9 weeks
change in diurnal saliva cortisol rhythm
Time Frame: change from baseline diurnal saliva cortisol rhythm at 3 months
Change in diurnal cortisol rhythm from from before to one month after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the concentrations of cortisol in saliva collected in the morning shortly after waking and in the evening about 2 hours before bedtime.
change from baseline diurnal saliva cortisol rhythm at 3 months
change in healthcare activation / utilization
Time Frame: change from baseline healthcare activation/ utilization at 9 weeks
Change in health care activation and utilization from from before to immediately after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the investigator-written questionnaire that will measure intent to use cancer-related survivorship plans [survivor] and management plans of other chronic conditions [survivor and caregiver].
change from baseline healthcare activation/ utilization at 9 weeks
change in healthcare activation / utilization
Time Frame: change from baseline healthcare activation/ utilization 3 months
Change in health care activation and utilization from from before to one month after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the investigator-written questionnaire that will measure intent to use cancer-related survivorship plans [survivor] and management plans of other chronic conditions [survivor and caregiver].
change from baseline healthcare activation/ utilization 3 months
change in depression features one month after the end of the intervention
Time Frame: change from baseline depression score at 3 months
The difference in the change in depression features between the intervention arms from before to one month after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the PROMIS-short form 8a depression scale.
change from baseline depression score at 3 months
change in anxiety features one month after the end of the intervention
Time Frame: change from baseline anxiety score at 3 months
The difference in the change in anxiety features between the intervention arms from before to one month after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the PROMIS-short form 8a anxiety scale.
change from baseline anxiety score at 3 months
change in fatigue one month after the end of the intervention
Time Frame: change from baseline fatigue score 3 months
The difference in the change in fatigue between the intervention arms from before to one month after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the PROMIS-short form 7a fatigue scale.
change from baseline fatigue score 3 months
change in empathy one month after the end of the intervention
Time Frame: change from baseline IRI total score 3 months
The difference in the change in empathy between the intervention arms from before to one month after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI).
change from baseline IRI total score 3 months
change in feelings of social isolation / connection one month after the end of the intervention
Time Frame: change from baseline Social Connectedness Scale-Revised score 3 months
The difference in the change in feelings of social isolation between the intervention arms from before to one month after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the Social Connectedness Scale-Revised (SCS-R).
change from baseline Social Connectedness Scale-Revised score 3 months
change in anxiety features
Time Frame: change from baseline anxiety score at 9 weeks
The difference in the change in anxiety features between the intervention arms from before to immediately after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the PROMIS-short form 8a anxiety scale.
change from baseline anxiety score at 9 weeks
change in fatigue
Time Frame: change from baseline fatigue score at 9 weeks
The difference in the change in fatigue between the intervention arms from before to immediately after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the PROMIS-short form 7a fatigue scale.
change from baseline fatigue score at 9 weeks
change in empathy
Time Frame: change from baseline IRI total score at 9 weeks
The difference in the change in empathy between the intervention arms from before to immediately after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI).
change from baseline IRI total score at 9 weeks
change in feelings of social isolation / connection
Time Frame: change from baseline Social Connectedness Scale-Revised score at 9 weeks
The difference in the change in feelings of social isolation between the intervention arms from before to immediately after the 8-week interventions will be measured with the Social Connectedness Scale-Revised (SCS-R). The SCS-R is a 20-item scale, with higher total scores indicating higher connectedness to others. The range of possible total scores is from 20 to 120. There are no subscales.
change from baseline Social Connectedness Scale-Revised score at 9 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Thaddeus Pace

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 14, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 11, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 11, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 27, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 2, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 22, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EJC001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer Survivors

Clinical Trials on Cognitively-Based Compassion Training

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings