Intra-articular Doxycycline: A Novel Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis (DOXY)

January 15, 2024 updated by: John Kuhn, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

We will recruit a total of 40 patients from the Vanderbilt Sports Medicine Clinics who have been diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis and have not undergone any previous treatment. The 40 patients will be randomized, with 20 in the control group of 3 intra-articular injections of 40mg Methylprednisolone spaced every two weeks, and 20 in the experimental group of 3 intra-articular injection of 50mg doxycycline spaced every two weeks. Both groups will begin a standardized physical therapy program within a pain-free range of motion 4 weeks after the initiation of treatment. We will prospectively follow patients for one year, with follow-up at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after the initiation of treatment.

Outcomes will be measured using the American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES) and objective measurements of shoulder range of motion, which will be collected by the treating physician. Both the patients and physicians participating in the study will be blinded.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Adhesive capsulitis, also known as frozen shoulder, is a common condition of the shoulder joint affecting 2-5% of the adult population and characterized by progressive, painful loss of both passive and active range of motion of shoulder [1,2]. Individuals affected by this condition find it increasingly difficult to perform activities of daily living that require overhead movement or rotation of the affected shoulder. The natural history of frozen shoulder follows a predictable progression of symptoms, lasting from 9-24 months before complete resolution, and results in significant loss of productivity and quality of life for those affected [3]. Despite the significant number of patients affected by adhesive capsulitis and the extensive literature focused on the progression and natural history of the condition, the true underlying etiology remains poorly understood. In light of this poor understanding of the condition, it is not surprising that a number of conservative and invasive modalities exist as accepted treatments. These include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), oral steroids, intra-articular steroid injections, Physical Therapy (PT), and benign neglect as well as more invasive treatments such as hydroxylation, manipulation under anesthesia, and arthroscopic capsular release [2]. These treatments have all be shown to have short-term benefit in pain relief, but none have proven to be superior nor alter the long-term natural history of adhesive capsulitis.

Over the past decade, however, there has been a growing body of literature suggesting that Propionibacterium acnes infection may play a significant role in a variety of pathological conditions affecting the native shoulder, most notably frozen shoulder [4,5]. Our goal is to employ a treatment strategy focused on eradicating P acnes infection as a conservative treatment of adhesive capsulitis. Through this project, we aim to complete a prospective randomized pilot study to examine the hypothesis that administration of intra-articular antibiotics effective against P acnes will prove to be a superior treatment of adhesive capsulitis as compared to current gold standard of intraarticular steroid injection.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age and older,
  • diagnosis of stage II adhesive capsulitis as determined by clinical examination of the treating physician, and
  • absence of abnormal findings on X-ray.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • allergy to Doxycycline or Methylprednisolone,
  • pregnancy,
  • diagnosis,
  • Inflammatory arthritis or diabetes,
  • secondary adhesive capsulitis (history of significant trauma, rotator cuff tear injury, stroke)
  • evidence of arthritis on x-ray,
  • current infectious disease, and
  • any previous treatment for the for adhesive capsulitis of the affected shoulder.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Methylprednisolone
Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomized into either the control group of intra-articular injection of 40mg Methylprednisolone once every 2 two weeks for 4 weeks (day 1, week 2, week 4) with 20 patients in each group. Injections will be administered by the treating physician.
Drug: Methylprednisolone Injectable Product
3 intra-articular injections of Methylprednisolone Injectable Product spaced every two weeks
Other Names:
  • Prednisone
Active Comparator: Doxycycline
Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomized or the experimental group of intraarticular injection of 50 mg doxycycline once every 2 two weeks for 4 weeks (day 1, week 2, week 4), with 20 patients in each group. Injections will be administered by the treating physician.
Drug: Doxycycline Injection
3 intra-articular injections of Doxycycline Injection spaced every two weeks
Other Names:
  • Doxy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
The American Shoulder and Elbow Score questionnaire was developed to provide a standardized method for evaluating shoulder function and has been validated in patients with any array of shoulder pathologies. ASES results are in the 0 to 100 range, where 0 indicates a worse shoulder condition and 100 indicates best shoulder condition, so the lower the score, the greater the level of shoulder disability. Transforming the pain and the ADLs domains into the final score relies on the following formulas: Pain = 5 x (10 - Score from question 7)
Baseline and 12 months
Change in Range of Motion(ROM) Measurements
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
The ROM measurements will include forward flexion, abduction, external rotation at the side and at 90 degrees abduction, and internal rotation at the side and at 90 degrees abduction recorded by the treating physician at follow up visits
Baseline and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Pain
Time Frame: Baseline
Number of participants with current dominant symptom and/or dominant symptom with disease onset
Baseline
Stiffness
Time Frame: Baseline
Number of participants with current dominant symptom and/or dominant symptom with disease onset
Baseline
Number of Medical Co-morbidities
Time Frame: Baseline
number of medical co-morbidities per participant
Baseline
Duration of Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline
Length of time participants have experienced shoulder symptoms
Baseline
Pain With Sitting
Time Frame: Baseline
Number of patients that have pain while sitting or have ever had pain while sitting will be recorded using patient-reported survey and review of the patient's electronic medical record in Epic.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Orthopedic Research and Education Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: John E Kuhn, MD, Study Director

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 5, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 8, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 8, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 20, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 15, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 172011

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adhesive Capsulitis

Clinical Trials on Methylprednisolone Injectable Product

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings