Microbiota-anastomotic Leak Among Colorectal Surgery Patients : Pilot Study

April 5, 2018 updated by: Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

The Relationship Between Intestinal Microbiota, Colorectal Cancer and Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Surgery: Pilot Study

The study is based on the hypothesis that patients with postoperative anastomotic leakage have a different bacterial profile contributing to poor tissue healing, and that patients operated for colon cancer presumably have a different preoperative microbiota than healthy patients. This different composition is probably induced by the high heme level in the light intestinal tract that tumor spoliation generates.

The objective of the study is to evaluate the feasibility of a larger study to evaluate the difference between microbiota composition of patients with and without colorectal cancer, with inflammatory bowel disease and those with and without anastomotic leakage postoperatively of a colonic resection.

Stool samples will be taken from 20 patients, including 5 without intestinal pathology, 5 with colorectal cancer undergoing colorectal surgery, 5 with inflammatory bowel disease and 5 with anastomotic leakage after colectomy for colorectal cancer or inflammatory bowel disease.

The stool samples will be analyzed at CRCHUM to draw up a profile of the bacteria that make up the microbiota of each patient.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

No more details required.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H2X 3E4
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants included in groups 1,3 and 4 will be recruited at the outpatient clinic of the CHUM digestive surgery department, during the visit for evaluation prior surgery.

Participants included in group 2 will be recruited during the post surgery period, during their hospitalization in the department of digestive surgery of the CHUM.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

ALL

  • Informed consent obtained.
  • Between 18 to 90 years old inclusive.

  • Group 1 (colorectal cancer patients)

    • Patients with colorectal cancer confirmed with pathology results.
    • Oncological colon and / or rectal resection planned and performed by a surgeon from the digestive surgery department of the CHUM.

  • Group 2 (anastomotic leak patients)

    • Patients with colorectal cancer confirmed with pathology and / or patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
    • Patients who underwent colonic and / or rectal surgical resection, complicated by an anastomotic leak in the postoperative period.

  • Group 3 ("healthy" patients)

    • Patients with uncomplicated hernia pathology assessed externally in anticipation or after hernia repair surgery that does not involve gastrointestinal resection.
    • Patients with no history of colorectal neoplasia or surgical resection of the gastrointestinal tract.

  • Group 4 (inflammatory bowel disease patients)

    • Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), waiting for elective surgery involving gastrointestinal resection.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy.
  • Class of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)> 3.
  • Chemotherapy and / or pelvic and / or abdominal radiotherapy within 6 months prior to collection of the stool sample prior to surgery (group 3 with healthy patients only).
  • Colonoscopy within 3 months prior to collection of the stool sample prior to surgery (group 3 with healthy patients only).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Group 1
Colorectal cancer patients who will undergo a surgical resection with digestive anastomosis. Fecal sample collection for analysis before and after surgery (2 samples).
Other: Fecal sample collection for analysis
Fecal sample analysis will consist of the following procedure : Microbial DNA extraction, amplicon library construction, sequencing and analysis; Clustering MiSeq reads into operational taxonomic units (OTUs); Iron and heme measurements in the samples.
Group 2
Patients having undergone surgical resection with digestive anastomosis for colorectal cancer or inflammatory bowel disease, complicated by anastomotic leakage. Fecal sample collection for analysis after surgery, once the leak is confirmed.
Other: Fecal sample collection for analysis
Fecal sample analysis will consist of the following procedure : Microbial DNA extraction, amplicon library construction, sequencing and analysis; Clustering MiSeq reads into operational taxonomic units (OTUs); Iron and heme measurements in the samples.
Group 3
Patients with uncomplicated hernia pathology, without gastrointestinal comorbidity to undergo a surgery to heal this hernia without involving a gastrointestinal resection. Fecal sample collection for analysis before surgery (1 sample).
Other: Fecal sample collection for analysis
Fecal sample analysis will consist of the following procedure : Microbial DNA extraction, amplicon library construction, sequencing and analysis; Clustering MiSeq reads into operational taxonomic units (OTUs); Iron and heme measurements in the samples.
Group 4
Inflammatory bowel disease patients waiting for elective surgery involving gastrointestinal resection. Fecal sample collection for analysis during surgery, directly from the bowel content (1 sample).
Other: Fecal sample collection for analysis
Fecal sample analysis will consist of the following procedure : Microbial DNA extraction, amplicon library construction, sequencing and analysis; Clustering MiSeq reads into operational taxonomic units (OTUs); Iron and heme measurements in the samples.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the feasibility of patients' recruitment
Time Frame: 3 months
Evaluate if we can recruit all required patients easily ; 20 patients total and 5 patients per group (Yes or No).
3 months
Evaluate the feasibility of fecal samples' analysis
Time Frame: 3 months
Evaluate if we can easily perform the fecal sample analysis with the establish procedures (Yes or No).
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation the presence of a correlation between fecal microbiota composition and the risk of anastomotic leak.
Time Frame: 6 months
If it is possible to obtain results from the fecal samples' analysis, a possible correlation in the results will be evaluate.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Carole Richard, MD, FRCSC, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montréal

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 30, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 12, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 5, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CE 17.243

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings