Efficacy of the Use of Dry Needling in Conventional Non-invasive Treatment of Acute and Subacute Whiplash

June 10, 2020 updated by: Raquel Lorenzo Moreno, University of Alcala

INTRODUCTION: Whiplash is an injury produced by an acceleration-deceleration mechanism that transmits energy to the cervical spine. According to the bibliography, the conservative treatment (motor control exercises and manual therapy) has shown benefits in approaching this lesion, but its efficacy is limited. Dry needling has already shown its usefulness in different musculoskeletal pathologies, however, its efficacy is unknown when it is included in conservative treatment.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to assess the effects of the incorporation of dry needling in the conventional treatment with manual therapy and motor control exercises, compared to the conventional non-invasive treatment in patients with acute or subacute whiplash.

HYPOTHESIS: The inclusion of dry needling in conventional non-invasive treatment is more effective than conventional non-invasive treatment in patients with acute or subacute whiplash.

METHODS: A randomized clinical trial will be conducted in which the subjects of study will be assigned to two groups, a control group (conventional treatment) and an experimental group (conventional treatment and dry needling).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alcalá De Henares, Spain
        • Universidad de Alcala

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medical Diagnosis of Whiplash Grade I-II in the QTF
  • Neck Pain
  • Whiplash in Acute or Subacute Phase

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Belonephobia
  • Cervical Fractures-Dislocations or Neurological Deficit Secondaries to Accident
  • Previous Surgery of the Cervical Spine
  • Circulatory Disease, Respiratory Disease, Neurological Disease, Rheumatologic Disease and Mental Illness
  • Athletes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional Treatment
Motor Control + Manual Therapy
Neck Motor Control
Massage + Joint Mobilizations
Experimental: Experimental Treatment
Motor Control + Manual Therapy + Dry Needling
Neck Motor Control
Massage + Joint Mobilizations
Dry Needling in Neck Muscles

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neck Disability Index. Changes from Baseline
Time Frame: 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
0-100% (0% = No Disability; 100% = Disability (highest level of disability)
3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pressure pain thresholds. Changes from Baseline
Time Frame: 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
The minimum force applied which induces pain. Measured kg/cm2
3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
Cervical Range of Movement. Changes from Baseline
Time Frame: 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
Amount of cervical movement using a goniometer
3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
Kinesophobia. Changes from Baseline
Time Frame: 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
Fear of movement measured by the TAMPA scale
3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
Cervical Motor Control. Changes from Baseline
Time Frame: 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
measure of cervical joint position sense using a laser
3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 4, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 16, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1489327794181094

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Whiplash Injuries

Clinical Trials on Motor Control

Search Similar Trials