Motor Control Exercise in Osteoporotic Women

Motor Control Exercise Can Reduce Pain and Improve Postural Alignment in Osteoporotic Women With Vertebral Fractures: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The objective of this study was to explore the effectiveness of Motor Control Exercise on pain, postural alignment and spinal curvatures in women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Osteoporosis is a common metabolic bone disease that usually affects the aging population. It is an important public health problem, due to its association with vertebral and nonvertebral fractures leading to increased morbidity. Vertebral fractures are accompanied by kyphosis, reduced pulmonary function, loss of height, and are often associated with elevated pain while they may also lead to subsequent vertebral fractures. Osteoporotic individuals exhibit kyphosis in the erect standing position, which, in turn, is compensated by the deformation of other parts of the body. Improvement of postural alignment may lead to less stress on the spine, facilitate posture and proper body mechanics and may improve balance. The aim of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of Motor Control Exercise on pain, postural alignment and spinal curvatures in women with osteoporotic vertebral fracture against the results of a control group that received the basic therapies for osteoporosis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Attica
      • Athens, Attica, Greece, 11144
        • Hospital Thias Pronoias 'I Pammakaristos'

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Postmenopausal osteoporosis
  • Osteoporotic vertebral fractures
  • Pain
  • Under medical osteoporotic treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • osteoporosis other than primary postmenopausal
  • vertebral collapse with neurological deficits
  • more than 5 fractured vertebrae
  • major respiratory conditions
  • receiving pain reducing agents, teriparatide or calcitonin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Motor control exercise
Subjects of the exercise group underwent a 3-month (13-week) treatment program directed on 3-weekly 1-hr one-to-one sessions by the researcher who had experience in the specific exercise treatment of the spinal region. During the next 3 months, the subjects were urged to perform the exercises alone at home at least once a day, and compliance was monitored by the activity quota chart given to them at the beginning of each study-month.
Participants of the exercise group were trained to consciously co-activate the transversus abdominis, pelvic floor and thoracic erector spinae muscle, relax the lumbar multifidus and use the diaphragmatic breathing pattern. They were encouraged to activate the specific muscles of the trunk regularly during daily activities, particularly in situations where they anticipated or experienced pain such as walking, twisting, lifting low-lying objects and working with the hands in sitting or standing positions
No Intervention: Control group
The control group underwent treatment throughout a 6-month period, directed by each patient's medical practitioner. This consisted of the patients carrying out regular weekly general exercises (walking and swimming). Three of them regularly attended other treatment providers involving group general exercise programs. Two patients received the application of local pain-relieving methods such as heat, massage, laser and ultrasound and one did nothing except for receiving osteoporotic medication.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain
Time Frame: Baseline
Pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) of 11 numerical points (0='no pain', 10='worst imaginable pain'). Participants were asked to verbalize the presence of pain in their trunk and lower limbs during the previous 2 weeks.
Baseline
Pain
Time Frame: 3 months
As described
3 months
Pain
Time Frame: 6 months
As described
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Photographic measurements
Time Frame: Baseline
Two-dimensional posture photography was performed using a digital Video Camera. With participants in their underwear, self-adhesive patches of 1.5 cm were placed over the left-side lateral landmarks. Women were instructed to stand in a comfortable posture with feet 20 cm apart. The participants were photographed twice at each time point. The photographs were analyzed by measuring the angles between a perpendicular line transcending the lateral malleolus, head of fibula, great trochanter, shoulder and ear. The mean of each angle of both photographs was used for statistical analysis.
Baseline
Spinal curvatures
Time Frame: Baseline
These were measured using a Sounders digital inclinometer according to the instruction manual. Standing thoracic, lumbar, and lumbosacral angle were measured. The examiner repeated the procedure three times, and if the measurements differed by more than 5 degrees, they were repeated and the second set of measurements recorded.
Baseline
Photographic measurements
Time Frame: 3 months
As described
3 months
Spinal curvatures
Time Frame: 3 months
As described
3 months
Photographic measurements
Time Frame: 6 months
As described
6 months
Spinal curvatures
Time Frame: 6 month
As described
6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

July 30, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 30, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2010

Last Verified

January 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoporosis

Clinical Trials on Motor control exercise

3
Subscribe