Cardiac MRI for Optimal Heart Failure Outcomes With CRT Upgrades

April 30, 2018 updated by: Kenneth Bilchick, MD, University of Virginia
This study will investigate the use of cardiac MRI in patients with standard ICDs and pacemakers to inform how cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can best be implemented in these patient and which patients are the best candidates for CRT.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The scientific premise of this proposal is that left and right ventricular (LV and RV) structural characteristics in patients with existing cardiac implantable electronic devices and heart failure who may benefit from an upgrade to a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device can be assessed very effectively using cardiac MRI using sequences designed for post-device imaging. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of the differences in LV/RV structural characteristics in patients with existing devices referred for CRT upgrades versus those with de novo CRT implants is expected to be very useful for developing effective strategies for optimal patient selection for CRT upgrades and implementation of CRT upgrades in appropriate patients. Patient selection for CRT upgrades is very important considering that complication rates are higher than in de novo CRT procedures and nonresponse rates are still high. With this in mind, we are performing a study of 100 patients, including 50 prospectively enrolled patients with LVEF less than or equal to 0.35 and New York Heart Association class II-III heart failure, who will be compared with an existing cohort of 50 patients with recent de novo CRT implants, pre-CRT MRIs, and response data. The 50 prospectively enrolled patients having CRT upgrades will undergo a pre-CRT cardiac MRI, pre-CRT/post-CRT echocardiography, and pre-CRT/post-CRT cardiopulmonary exercise testing. In the first aim, we will assess differences in cardiac MRI findings between CRT upgrade patients and de novo CRT patients. In the second aim, we will assess the impact of cardiac MRI findings on LV reverse remodeling and cardiopulmonary capacity in the two groups. In summary, we propose a comprehensive prospective CRT/MRI study in CRT upgrade patients with comparison to a complete MRI dataset of patients with de novo CRT implants in order to identify key differences in MRI findings in these cohorts and the impact of these MRI-based scar and activation findings on clinical outcomes. We expect that our results will have a significant public health impact for patients with heart failure referred for CRT upgrades.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22901
        • Recruiting
        • University of Virginia Health System
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Undergoing upgrade from an existing pacemaker or ICD to a CRT device.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to provide informed consent
  • pregnancy
  • presence of metal embedded in the body due to prior accident or injury, as documented by skull films or other imaging
  • cerebral aneurysm clips
  • cochlear implants
  • other metallic implants known to be contraindications to MRI (pacemakers and ICDs are allowed)
  • severe claustrophobia
  • acute kidney injury
  • acute renal failure
  • gadolinium allergy
  • abandoned leads

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: MRI Prior to CRT for Upgrades
MRI will be performed prior to CRT upgrade.
Diagnostic test: MRI prior to CRT Upgrade
We will perform MRI prior to CRT to inform the optimal CRT implantation strategy in patients with existing devices undergoing upgrades versus those with de novo CRT implants. We will compare outcomes in the two groups.
Active Comparator: MRI Prior to de novo CRT Implants
MRI will be performed prior to de novo CRT implants.
Diagnostic test: MRI prior to de novo CRT
We will perform MRI prior to de novo CRT implants as the comparison group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CRT Response
Time Frame: 6 months
CRT Response Based on Change in LVESV After CRT
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in Peak Oxygen Consumption
Time Frame: 6 months
Peak VO2
6 months
Improvement in Short Form (36) Health Survey
Time Frame: 6 months
Assesses disability associated with heart failure. We will use the total score, which has a range of 0-100. Lower scores indicate greater disability.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Virginia

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kenneth C Bilchick, MD, University of Virginia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 3, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 30, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MRI FOR CRT UPGRADES

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

This research will generate MRI, echocardiographic, and cardiopulmonary exercise data in patients referred for CRT upgrades. Examples of specific data fields include the extent/distribution of myocardial scar based on late gadolinium enhancement, characterization of mechanical activation based on MRI strain imaging, baseline MRI volumetric and functional measures, changes in echocardiographic volumes and function resulting from CRT, and changes in cardiopulmonary capacity resulting from CRT.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

2 years

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Not yet available.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Systolic Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on MRI prior to CRT Upgrade

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings