A Study of Triple-site Ventricular Pacing in Patients Who Have Not Responded to Conventional Dual Ventricular Site Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (TRIVENT)

December 7, 2015 updated by: University Hospitals, Leicester

TRIple-site VENTricular Pacing in Non-responders to Conventional Dual Ventricular Site Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Patients are randomised to receive ongoing optimised device and medical therapy or triple ventricular site resynchronisation. The hypothesis states that patients receiving triple-site resynchronization will exhibit a better response.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
    • England
      • Leicester, England, United Kingdom, LE3 9QP
        • University of Leicester HNS trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Implanted with a CRT device > 6 months previously according to current and conventional CRT indications
  • Device optimization > 1 months previously
  • Aged 18yrs or older
  • Able to attend outpatient follow up

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recent MI (<2 months)
  • Women who are pregnant or planning pregnancy
  • Severe co morbid illness (where patients are not expected to survive duration of follow up period or where repeated outpatient visits may not be in best interest of patients)
  • Upgrade procedure is contraindicated for safety reasons.
  • Class IV inotropic agents
  • Patient unwilling to comply with required follow-up protocol including randomization scheme

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Triple site CRT
These patients will continue to receive CRT via existing device but will have a change in the mode of delivery of therapy (by placing a second pacing lead to reach a different part of the left ventricle from the part originally paced
Procedure: Upgrade to triple ventricular site CRT
Patients in this arm will continue to receive CRT via the original unit, but some will have a change in the mode of delivery of therapy (by placing a second pacing lead to reach a different part of the left ventricle from the part originally paced).
No Intervention: Optimised medical and device therapy
These patients will receive optimised medical and device therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of responders in each group. o Clinical response will be defined according to the Packer score o Echocardiographic response will be defined as a 10% relative reduction in left ventricular end systolic volume at six months
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
NYHA class
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
3 and 6 months
ECHO parameters (LVEDV/ESV, LVEF, MR severity, dyssynchrony indices: time to peak velocity/strain/deformation/time to minimal volume)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
3 and 6 months
MVO2 max
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University Hospitals, Leicester

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: GAndre Ng, MB ChB, PhD, University of Leicester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

July 20, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 8, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UHL10707

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe