Foundations of Fitness Program Pilot

July 8, 2019 updated by: Auden McClure, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Foundations of Fitness: A Clinic-Community Partnership to Address Pediatric Obesity

Approximately 17% of US children have obesity resulting in significant childhood co-morbidities and increased lifetime risk of adult obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cancer. Guidelines recommend intensive lifestyle programs as first-line treatment, yet few pediatric practices are equipped to provide this. Clinical-community partnerships are well-positioned to address this care gap. This proposal aims to assess whether a community-delivered lifestyle program offered in adjunct to primary care obesity management is feasible, acceptable, effective, and easily implemented in a rural care setting. In this study, approximately 40 children aged 7-13 years old and their caregiver pairs will be recruited from a primary care pediatric clinic. Child-adult dyads will participate in a 24-week program that includes 2 phases, a 12-week usual care phase and a 12-week intervention phase. The intervention phase will include bi-weekly meetings of a community intensive lifestyle program which focuses on healthy diet, daily physical activity, self-esteem and support for individual and family behavior change. A mixed-methods approach using qualitative interviews and study questionnaires, combined with objective measures of adiposity and fitness will assess study outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
29

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
        • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 13 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 7-13 years;
  • BMI% ≥85th%;
  • Regional pediatric medical home patient;
  • English speaking child and parent/caregiver;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Physical or developmental limitation to participation as determined by referring provider

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 7-10 years old
Children-caregiver pairs will participate in a 24-week pilot that includes 2 phases, 12 weeks of usual care, followed by 12 weeks of Foundations of Fitness Program.
Other: Foundations of Fitness Program
The Foundations of Fitness Program is a 12 week, bi-weekly community intensive lifestyle program which focuses on healthy diet, daily physical activity, self-esteem and support for individual and family behavior change, components supported by USPSTF evidence review. Class sessions, which involve both parent/caregiver and child will include structured fitness activities, hands on nutrition, cooking, shopping and meal planning and facilitated discussions about goal setting, self-monitoring, stimulus control and healthy homes and families. Content will be offered in a context that supports self-esteem and behavior change. The program was developed by the Carter Community Building Association (CCBA) in collaboration with the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Weight & Wellness Center research core.
Experimental: 11-13 years old
Children-caregiver pairs will participate in a 24-week pilot that includes 2 phases, 12 weeks of usual care, followed by 12 weeks of Foundations of Fitness Program.
Other: Foundations of Fitness Program
The Foundations of Fitness Program is a 12 week, bi-weekly community intensive lifestyle program which focuses on healthy diet, daily physical activity, self-esteem and support for individual and family behavior change, components supported by USPSTF evidence review. Class sessions, which involve both parent/caregiver and child will include structured fitness activities, hands on nutrition, cooking, shopping and meal planning and facilitated discussions about goal setting, self-monitoring, stimulus control and healthy homes and families. Content will be offered in a context that supports self-esteem and behavior change. The program was developed by the Carter Community Building Association (CCBA) in collaboration with the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Weight & Wellness Center research core.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Program Feasibility based on program attendance and completion of assessments to determine if children are willing and interested in to attending a fitness program.
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Programmatic feasibility will be defined as delivery of 100% of the sessions with 80% of children attending ≥75% of sessions and 80% completing pre- and post-assessments.
24 weeks
Program Acceptability based on interviews evaluating the appropriateness of the pilot and assessing strengths/weaknesses.
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Program acceptability will be assessed through semi-structured participant interviews ensuring the appropriateness of the pilot and assessing strengths/weaknesses.
24 weeks
Program Eligibility rate
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Calculated using the following formula: [# screen positive / # screened for inclusion].
24 weeks
Program Enrollment rate
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Calculated using the following formula: [# enrolled / (# screen positive & eligible)]. We will assess reasons for dropout/non-adherence.
24 weeks
Program Completion rate
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Calculated using the following formula: (# completing all sessions / # enrolled).
24 weeks
Assessment Completion rate
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Calculated using the following formula: (# completing all assessments / # enrolled).
24 weeks
Participant Satisfaction Survey
Time Frame: 24 weeks
A 12 item survey at program conclusion will assess patient satisfaction with program elements (overall, class sessions, staff, assessments) using Likert scales (1-5 point scale - very dissatisfied=1 to very satisfied=5).
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body Mass Index Percentile
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Height (cm) and Weight (kg) will be used to calculate body mass index (kg/m^2) and then BMI percentile (%) using Center for Disease Control 2000 standards.
48 weeks
Strength Assessment
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Assessed through 5 exercises including: leg extension, leg curl, lap pull down, shoulder press, chest press. Units for all are number of repetitions per minute at a fixed mass (lbs).
24 weeks
Health Habits Survey
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The Weight & Wellness Center Health Habits Survey assesses diet, activity, media and sleep behaviors through 46 individual survey questions with variable response categories (for example, overall physical activity is assessed using a 0-5 point Likert scale with higher score related to better physical activity level: " Overall my physical activity level is": Poor=0 - Excellent=5)
24 weeks
Subjective Health and Quality of Life Score
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Global Health 7 survey (child and parent proxy) is a 7-question survey (Score 7-35) capturing physical, mental, and social aspects of quality of life using Likert scales (1-5 point scale: poor/never=1 to excellent/always=5). Higher score indicates more positive perceptions of overall health.
24 weeks
Sense of Belonging in Fitness Program Score
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The Anderson-Butcher and Conroy Sense of Belonging survey is a 5-item questionnaire measuring sense of belonging experienced by children participating in a Fitness Program using Likert scale (1-4 point scale: NO!=1, no=2, yes=3, and YES!=4). Total Score Range 5-20: A higher score indicates a greater sense of belonging.
24 weeks
Self Esteem Score
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem survey is a 10-item questionnaire measuring self-esteem of children participating in a Fitness Program using Likert scale (0-3 point scale: Strongly disagree=0 to Strongly agree=3). Total Score Range 0-30: Higher scores indicate greater self-esteem.
24 weeks
Physical Activity Score
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) is a short form 4-question survey (Score 4-20) assessing physical activity over the past seven days using Likert scales (1-5 point scale: No days=1, 1 day=2, 2-3 days=3, 4-5 days=4, and 6-7 days=5). Higher score indicates higher levels of physical activity.
24 weeks
Cardio-capacity
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Distance (m) on treadmill at 65% of max heart rate.
24 weeks
Heart Rate
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Resting and recovery heart rate (BPM) measured before and after treadmill test.
24 weeks
Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Resting and recovery systolic and diastolic Blood pressure (mmHg) measured before and after treadmill test.
24 weeks
Waist Circumference
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Waist circumference will be measured (cm)
24 weeks
Perceived Athletic Competence Score
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The Harter Self-Perception Profile for Children is a short form 6-question survey (score 1-4) assessing athletic competence using a two-choice format with option then of checking "Sort of True for Me" or "Really True for Me" (A score of 1 indicates lowest and a score of 4 highest level of perceived athletic competence).
24 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Staff program adoption
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Staff program adoption will be assessed using semi-structured interviews assessing staff experience with workflow and adoption of Foundations of Fitness Program.
24 weeks
Fidelity to planned program
Time Frame: 24 weeks
We will assess percent of planned class sessions and planned outcome assessments that were administered.
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Auden C McClure, MD MPH, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 12, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 12, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 12, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 8, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • D18143

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings