4-aminopyridine Treatment for Nerve Injury From Radical Retro-Pubic Prostatectomy

October 31, 2018 updated by: Ahmed Ghazi, University of Rochester
The purpose of this study is to see if the study drug 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) can help speed up the recovery of peripheral nerve injury after prostatectomy. 4-AP is a potassium channel blocker used to improve walking in multiple sclerosis patients. Investigators will measure the effect that 4-AP may have on the recovery of sexual function and urinary incontinence after prostatectomy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • University of Rochester Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male patients with organ-confined, non-metastatic prostate cancer (stages cT1c-T2c), planning to undergo Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Bilateral Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP)
  • Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels less than 10 ng/ml, with biopsy-proven prostate cancer, for whom postoperative adjuvant therapy (e.g. radiation or androgen deprivation therapy) is not expected to be needed
  • Ages 45-75
  • An International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score of greater than or equal to 17 at time of screening
  • Is sexually active for at least 6 months with sexual activity within 6 weeks preceding prostate biopsy or surgery.
  • Willingness to participate and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Planned adjuvant therapy after NSRP based on specimen pathology and stage of prostate cancer (stage T3 or greater), positive lymph nodes or positive surgical margins.
  • History of prior phosphodiesterase inhibitor use
  • Neo-adjuvant therapy prior to NSRP
  • History of recurrent prostate cancer
  • History of seizures, multiple sclerosis, stroke or any other diagnosed neurological disorder
  • History of non-organ confined or metastatic prostate cancer (clinical Stages T3 or greater)
  • History of known hypersensitivity to AMPYRA® or 4-aminopyridine
  • Patients with history of penile surgery other than circumcision or endoscopic urethral stricture surgery.
  • Renal impairment based on calculated GFR (GFR<60 mL/min)
  • Use of any other aminopyridine medications for any other indication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 4-aminopyridine
Participants with recent prostatectomies receiving 4-aminopyridine
Drug: 4-aminopyridine
Oral tablet of 2.5 mg given 4 times a day
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants with recent prostatectomies receiving placebo
Drug: placebo
2.5 mg sugar pill given orally 4 times a day

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
percentage of participants with normal erectile dysfunction
Time Frame: 2 months
Erectile dysfunction will be assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function. Normal will be defined as a return to baseline. The index ranges from 0-75 with higher scores indicating better outcome. A score of 0-5 is awarded to each of the 15 questions that examine the 4 main domains of male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire and intercourse satisfaction.
2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the time point at which the highest number of subjects reporting normal erectile dysfunction
Time Frame: baseline to month 12
Erectile dysfunction will be assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function. Normal will be defined as a return to baseline. The index ranges from 0-75 with higher scores indicating better outcome. A score of 0-5 is awarded to each of the 15 questions that examine the 4 main domains of male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire and intercourse satisfaction.
baseline to month 12
percentage of participants with normal erectile dysfunction
Time Frame: week 3
Erectile dysfunction will be assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function. Normal will be defined as a return to baseline. The index ranges from 0-75 with higher scores indicating better outcome. A score of 0-5 is awarded to each of the 15 questions that examine the 4 main domains of male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire and intercourse satisfaction.
week 3
percentage of participants with normal erectile dysfunction
Time Frame: week 4
Erectile dysfunction will be assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function. Normal will be defined as a return to baseline. The index ranges from 0-75 with higher scores indicating better outcome. A score of 0-5 is awarded to each of the 15 questions that examine the 4 main domains of male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire and intercourse satisfaction.
week 4
percentage of participants with normal erectile dysfunction
Time Frame: week 6
Erectile dysfunction will be assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function. Normal will be defined as a return to baseline. The index ranges from 0-75 with higher scores indicating better outcome. A score of 0-5 is awarded to each of the 15 questions that examine the 4 main domains of male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire and intercourse satisfaction.
week 6
percentage of participants with normal erectile dysfunction
Time Frame: week 8
Erectile dysfunction will be assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function. Normal will be defined as a return to baseline. The index ranges from 0-75 with higher scores indicating better outcome. A score of 0-5 is awarded to each of the 15 questions that examine the 4 main domains of male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire and intercourse satisfaction.
week 8
percentage of participants with normal erectile dysfunction
Time Frame: week 10
Erectile dysfunction will be assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function. Normal will be defined as a return to baseline. The index ranges from 0-75 with higher scores indicating better outcome. A score of 0-5 is awarded to each of the 15 questions that examine the 4 main domains of male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire and intercourse satisfaction.
week 10
percentage of participants with normal erectile dysfunction
Time Frame: week 12
Erectile dysfunction will be assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function. Normal will be defined as a return to baseline. The index ranges from 0-75 with higher scores indicating better outcome. A score of 0-5 is awarded to each of the 15 questions that examine the 4 main domains of male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire and intercourse satisfaction.
week 12
percentage of participants with normal erectile dysfunction
Time Frame: week 14
Erectile dysfunction will be assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function. Normal will be defined as a return to baseline. The index ranges from 0-75 with higher scores indicating better outcome. A score of 0-5 is awarded to each of the 15 questions that examine the 4 main domains of male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire and intercourse satisfaction.
week 14
percentage of participants with normal erectile dysfunction
Time Frame: week 16
Erectile dysfunction will be assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function. Normal will be defined as a return to baseline. The index ranges from 0-75 with higher scores indicating better outcome. A score of 0-5 is awarded to each of the 15 questions that examine the 4 main domains of male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire and intercourse satisfaction.
week 16
percentage of participants with normal erectile dysfunction
Time Frame: week 18
Erectile dysfunction will be assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function. Normal will be defined as a return to baseline. The index ranges from 0-75 with higher scores indicating better outcome. A score of 0-5 is awarded to each of the 15 questions that examine the 4 main domains of male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire and intercourse satisfaction.
week 18
percentage of participants with normal erectile dysfunction
Time Frame: week 20
Erectile dysfunction will be assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function. Normal will be defined as a return to baseline. The index ranges from 0-75 with higher scores indicating better outcome. A score of 0-5 is awarded to each of the 15 questions that examine the 4 main domains of male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire and intercourse satisfaction.
week 20
percentage of participants with normal erectile dysfunction
Time Frame: week 22
Erectile dysfunction will be assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function. Normal will be defined as a return to baseline. The index ranges from 0-75 with higher scores indicating better outcome. A score of 0-5 is awarded to each of the 15 questions that examine the 4 main domains of male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire and intercourse satisfaction.
week 22
percentage of participants with normal erectile dysfunction
Time Frame: week 24
Erectile dysfunction will be assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function. Normal will be defined as a return to baseline. The index ranges from 0-75 with higher scores indicating better outcome. A score of 0-5 is awarded to each of the 15 questions that examine the 4 main domains of male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire and intercourse satisfaction.
week 24
percentage of participants with normal urinary continence
Time Frame: 2 months
Incontinence will be assessed using the Michigan Incontinence Symptom Index. The Michigan Incontinence Symptom Index ranges from 0-40 with higher scores indicating more problems with urinary incontinence.
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Rochester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 3, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 31, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 31, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 31, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 72666

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings