Dietary Triggers of Gastrointestinal Symptoms in IBS Patients
Crossover Trial of Purified Gluten and Whole Wheat (Gluten With Amylase-trypsin Inhibitors) as Triggers of Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a heterogenous, common gastrointestinal disorder characterized by chronic abdominal pain and altered bowel habits. Many IBS patients report symptom relief on a gluten-free diet (GFD), but it is uncertain whether gluten is the true culprit. The gluten-containing grains wheat, rye, and barley all contain amylase-trypsin inhibitors (ATIs), and a GFD is virtually ATI-free.
This double-blinded crossover randomized controlled trial aims to determine which IBS patients are affected by pure gluten and which are affected by gluten combined with ATIs. IBS patients who respond to and have been on a GFD for 3+ weeks will be randomized to receive a dietary challenge of muesli bars containing either 1) 10 g pure gluten, 2) whole wheat (containing 10 g gluten and wheat ATIs), 3) or gluten-free sham for a week followed by a 14 day washout. This will be repeated until all participants have had each dietary challenge.
The study will evaluate the effects and potential mechanisms of purified gluten and whole wheat (containing the same dose of non-purified gluten) on intestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms in IBS. It is likely that some IBS patients respond to gluten, while others respond to whole wheat containing gluten combined with wheat ATIs. Thus, this project may lead to better diagnosis and individualized dietary treatments for IBS.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Caroline Seiler, BSc
- Phone Number: 905-580-0325
- Email: seilercl@mcmaster.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 3Z5
- McMaster University Medical Centre
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- IBS diagnosis based on Rome IV criteria.
- Previously improved while on a gluten-free diet.
- Compliance with the study procedures (according to the investigator's own judgement).
- Signing the Study Informed Consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Concurrent systemic disease and/or laboratory abnormalities considered by investigators to be risky or that could interfere with data collection.
- Concurrent organic gastrointestinal disease (i.e. Celiac disease, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, peptic ulcer disease, etc.) other than benign polyps, diverticulosis, hemorrhoids, lipoma and melanosis coli.
- Major abdominal surgery with the exception of hernia repair, appendectomy, Caesarian section, tubal ligation, cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, and hemorrhoidectomy.
- History of active cancer in the last 5 years, other than skin basal cells cancer.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
- Current use of antibiotics or antibiotic treatment within 1 months before the first visit.
- Consumption of probiotics within 1 month prior to the first visit.
- Use of non-authorized medications (see Unauthorized Medications section).
- Patients on a high fibre diet (>35 g/day for males, > 25 g/day for females), consuming high inulin containing foods (>5 g/day), and/or consuming dietary fibre supplements (as assessed by dietary assessment questionnaire) in the 4 weeks prior to the first visit.
- Patients currently participating or having participated in a trial within the past month.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Purified Gluten (10 g), Whole Wheat (containing 10 g Gluten and Wheat ATIs), Gluten-free Sham
Participants will start on 1 week of muesli bars with 10 g purified gluten followed by 14 days washout.
They will then take 1 week of muesli bars with whole wheat (containing 10 g non-purified gluten and wheat ATIs) followed by 14 days of washout.
Finally, they will have 1 week of gluten-free sham muesli bars (with nothing).
|
1 low FODMAPs, vegan muesli bar containing purified gluten per day for 1 week, for a total of 10 g purified gluten per day.
1 low FODMAPs, vegan muesli bar containing whole wheat flour with non-purified gluten per day for 1 week, for a total of 10 g non-purified gluten per day.
1 gluten-free, ATI-free, low FODMAPs, vegan muesli bar per day for 1 week.
This is a sham because participants were blinded to the identity of this gluten-free control and randomly assigned to it.
|
|
Experimental: Purified Gluten (10 g), Gluten-free Sham, Whole Wheat (containing 10 g Gluten and Wheat ATIs)
Participants will start on 1 week of muesli bars with 10 g purified gluten followed by 14 days washout.
They will then take 1 week of gluten-free sham muesli bars (with nothing) followed by 14 days of washout.
Finally, they will have 1 week of muesli bars with whole wheat (containing 10 g non-purified gluten and wheat ATIs).
|
1 low FODMAPs, vegan muesli bar containing purified gluten per day for 1 week, for a total of 10 g purified gluten per day.
1 low FODMAPs, vegan muesli bar containing whole wheat flour with non-purified gluten per day for 1 week, for a total of 10 g non-purified gluten per day.
1 gluten-free, ATI-free, low FODMAPs, vegan muesli bar per day for 1 week.
This is a sham because participants were blinded to the identity of this gluten-free control and randomly assigned to it.
|
|
Experimental: Whole Wheat (containing 10 g Gluten and Wheat ATIs), Purified Gluten (10 g), Gluten-free Sham
Participants will start on 1 week of muesli bars with whole wheat (containing 10 g non-purified gluten and wheat ATIs) followed by 14 days washout.
They will then take 1 week of muesli bars with 10 g purified gluten followed by 14 days of washout.
Finally, they will have 1 week of gluten-free sham muesli bars (with nothing).
|
1 low FODMAPs, vegan muesli bar containing purified gluten per day for 1 week, for a total of 10 g purified gluten per day.
1 low FODMAPs, vegan muesli bar containing whole wheat flour with non-purified gluten per day for 1 week, for a total of 10 g non-purified gluten per day.
1 gluten-free, ATI-free, low FODMAPs, vegan muesli bar per day for 1 week.
This is a sham because participants were blinded to the identity of this gluten-free control and randomly assigned to it.
|
|
Experimental: Whole Wheat (containing 10 g Gluten and Wheat ATIs), Gluten-free Sham, Purified Gluten (10 g)
Participants will start on 1 week of muesli bars with whole wheat (containing 10 g non-purified gluten and wheat ATIs) followed by 14 days washout.
They will then take 1 week of gluten-free sham muesli bars (containing nothing) followed by 14 days of washout.
Finally, they will have 1 week of muesli bars with 10 g purified gluten.
|
1 low FODMAPs, vegan muesli bar containing purified gluten per day for 1 week, for a total of 10 g purified gluten per day.
1 low FODMAPs, vegan muesli bar containing whole wheat flour with non-purified gluten per day for 1 week, for a total of 10 g non-purified gluten per day.
1 gluten-free, ATI-free, low FODMAPs, vegan muesli bar per day for 1 week.
This is a sham because participants were blinded to the identity of this gluten-free control and randomly assigned to it.
|
|
Experimental: Gluten-free Sham, Whole Wheat (containing 10 g Gluten and Wheat ATIs), Purified Gluten (10 g)
Participants will start on 1 week of gluten-free sham muesli bars (with nothing) followed by 14 days washout.
They will then take 1 week of muesli bars containing whole wheat (containing 10 g non-purified gluten and wheat ATIs) followed by 14 days of washout.
Finally, they will have 1 week of muesli bars with 10 g purified gluten.
|
1 low FODMAPs, vegan muesli bar containing purified gluten per day for 1 week, for a total of 10 g purified gluten per day.
1 low FODMAPs, vegan muesli bar containing whole wheat flour with non-purified gluten per day for 1 week, for a total of 10 g non-purified gluten per day.
1 gluten-free, ATI-free, low FODMAPs, vegan muesli bar per day for 1 week.
This is a sham because participants were blinded to the identity of this gluten-free control and randomly assigned to it.
|
|
Experimental: Gluten-free Sham, Purified Gluten (10 g), Whole Wheat (containing 10 g Gluten and Wheat ATIs)
Participants will start on 1 week of gluten-free sham muesli bars (with nothing) followed by 14 days washout.
They will then take 1 week of muesli bars with 10 g purified gluten followed by 14 days of washout.
Finally, they will have 1 week of muesli bars with whole wheat (containing 10 g non-purified gluten and wheat ATIs).
|
1 low FODMAPs, vegan muesli bar containing purified gluten per day for 1 week, for a total of 10 g purified gluten per day.
1 low FODMAPs, vegan muesli bar containing whole wheat flour with non-purified gluten per day for 1 week, for a total of 10 g non-purified gluten per day.
1 gluten-free, ATI-free, low FODMAPs, vegan muesli bar per day for 1 week.
This is a sham because participants were blinded to the identity of this gluten-free control and randomly assigned to it.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Worsening Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) Symptoms Based on IBS-SSS
Time Frame: 1 week purified gluten or whole wheat (gluten+ATIs) intervention versus gluten-free sham. Outcomes were measured at baseline for Pre-Sham, Pre-Gluten and Pre-Wheat Arm/Groups and 1 week for Sham, Gluten and Wheat Arm/Groups.
|
Number of participants with a clinically meaningful worsening of symptoms during dietary challenge compared to sham, as defined by an increase of >50 points in the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS).
The IBS-SSS ranges from 0 to 500, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
A >50-point increase is considered a clinically significant worsening.
|
1 week purified gluten or whole wheat (gluten+ATIs) intervention versus gluten-free sham. Outcomes were measured at baseline for Pre-Sham, Pre-Gluten and Pre-Wheat Arm/Groups and 1 week for Sham, Gluten and Wheat Arm/Groups.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
General Gastrointestinal Symptoms
Time Frame: 1 week purified gluten or whole wheat (gluten+ATIs) intervention compared to gluten-free sham. Outcomes were measured at 1 week for Sham, Gluten and Wheat Arm/Groups.
|
Worsening of general gastrointestinal symptoms (using The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS Scales) for belly pain, diarrhea, constipation, or gas & bloating) after dietary challenge compared to sham.
Scores are calculated using the Scoring Service by Health Measures and range from 20-80, with medians set at 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.
Four PROMIS subscales are being used: Gas & Bloating, Diarrhea, Constipation, and Belly Pain.
Each subscale follows the T-scale scoring range of 20-80 and will be measured independently.
|
1 week purified gluten or whole wheat (gluten+ATIs) intervention compared to gluten-free sham. Outcomes were measured at 1 week for Sham, Gluten and Wheat Arm/Groups.
|
|
Orocecal Transit
Time Frame: Assessed at 1 week after each intervention period (Sham, Gluten, and Wheat).
|
Colonic transit assessed by SHAPE study (radiopaque markers). We measured orocecal transit time according to a modified SHAPE study using radiopaque markers, clinically used to identify patients with colonic inertia. Participants consumed 1 SITZARKS capsule (Konsyl Pharmaceuticals, Easton, MD) containing 24 markers, 48 hours prior to a plain abdominal film. A technician took a plain abdominal x-ray to provide images of the number and locations of the markers remaining in the gastrointestinal tract at 48 hours. A greater number of markers (up to 24) indicates slower gastrointestinal transit while less markers (or none) indicate faster transit. The outcome was assessed at the end of each 1-week intervention period (i.e., at Week 1 for Sham, Gluten, and Wheat Arms). Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in-person study visits were limited and the SHAPE study was only conducted in N=13 participants. |
Assessed at 1 week after each intervention period (Sham, Gluten, and Wheat).
|
|
Anti-gliadin Antibody (AGA) Levels
Time Frame: Serum AGAs were measured at baseline.
|
Change in AGA levels after purified gluten and whole wheat (gluten+wheat ATI) challenge will be assessed by ELISA NOTE: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in-person, non-essential blood withdrawals were paused. Blood collection occurred pre-pandemic and after in-person visits were allowed, in a total of N=14 participants. A post-study follow-up amendment, accepted by the Hamilton integrated Research Ethics Board (HiREB), allowed post-study collection of blood samples to assess the presence of AGAs and genetic markers. |
Serum AGAs were measured at baseline.
|
|
Gut Microbiota Profiles
Time Frame: Stool samples collected at 1 week after each intervention period (Sham, Gluten, and Wheat)
|
This outcome was intended to assess gut microbiota profiles using 16S rRNA Illumina sequencing of stool samples collected after each 1-week intervention period.
However, data for this outcome are not available.
|
Stool samples collected at 1 week after each intervention period (Sham, Gluten, and Wheat)
|
|
Genetic Predisposition for Celiac Disease
Time Frame: Patient HLA DQ2/8 status were measured at baseline
|
Patient HLADQ2/8 status will be assessed at baseline NOTE: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in-person, non-essential blood withdrawals were paused. Blood collection occurred pre-pandemic and after in-person visits were allowed, in a total of N=14 participants. A post-study follow-up, accepted by the Hamilton integrated Research Ethics Board (HiREB), allowed post-study collection of blood samples to assess the presence of AGAs and genetic markers. |
Patient HLA DQ2/8 status were measured at baseline
|
|
Depression, Anxiety and Stress
Time Frame: 1 week purified gluten or whole wheat (gluten+ATIs) intervention compared to gluten-free sham. Outcomes were measured at 1 week for Sham, Gluten and Wheat Arm/Groups.
|
Worsening of depression, anxiety, and stress sub-scales during dietary challenge was assessed by Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21).
The DASS-21 has 21 questions.
The three subscales (depression, anxiety, and stress) are reported independently and range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
|
1 week purified gluten or whole wheat (gluten+ATIs) intervention compared to gluten-free sham. Outcomes were measured at 1 week for Sham, Gluten and Wheat Arm/Groups.
|
|
Somatic Symptoms
Time Frame: 1 week purified gluten or whole wheat (gluten+ATIs) intervention compared to gluten-free sham. Outcomes were measured at 1 week for Sham, Gluten and Wheat Arm/Groups.
|
Worsening of somatic symptoms like fatigue, sleeping trouble, and pain were assessed using Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15).
Scores range from 0 to 30, with greater scores indicating greater severity.
|
1 week purified gluten or whole wheat (gluten+ATIs) intervention compared to gluten-free sham. Outcomes were measured at 1 week for Sham, Gluten and Wheat Arm/Groups.
|
|
Stool Consistency
Time Frame: 1 week purified gluten or whole wheat (gluten+ATIs) intervention compared to gluten-free sham. Outcomes were measured at 1 week for Sham, Gluten and Wheat Arm/Groups.
|
Stool consistency was assessed by Bristol Stool Scale.
Types 1 and 2 indicate harder stools, types 3, 4, and 5 are normal, and types 6 and 7 indicate runnier, more liquid stool.
|
1 week purified gluten or whole wheat (gluten+ATIs) intervention compared to gluten-free sham. Outcomes were measured at 1 week for Sham, Gluten and Wheat Arm/Groups.
|
|
Gluten Levels in Stool
Time Frame: Assessed at 1 week after each intervention period (Sham, Gluten, and Wheat).
|
Presence of gluten in stool samples was assessed to evaluate dietary compliance using an ELISA for gluten immunogenic peptides (GIP), measured in micrograms per gram of stool (μg/g). Stool samples were collected at the end of each 1-week intervention period (i.e., at Week 1 for Sham, Gluten, and Wheat). The values reported reflect GIP concentration at the end of each intervention. |
Assessed at 1 week after each intervention period (Sham, Gluten, and Wheat).
|
|
Diet Assessment
Time Frame: During each 1-week intervention period (Sham, Gluten, and Wheat).
|
This outcome was intended to assess dietary intake and compliance during each 1-week intervention period using the MealLogger app.
Participants were instructed to take pictures of all meals during each intervention week to support dietary tracking and adherence monitoring.
However, image analysis was not performed and data for this outcome are not available.
|
During each 1-week intervention period (Sham, Gluten, and Wheat).
|
|
IBS Symptom Duration
Time Frame: Completed daily for 7 days after each diet challenge
|
Evaluates symptom duration at the end of the diet challenge using the IBS-SSS.
The overall score ranges from 0-500 in total, with each of the 5 questions ranging from 0 to 100.
A higher score indicates higher symptom severity and the total score is summed.
|
Completed daily for 7 days after each diet challenge
|
|
Systemic Immune Reactivity
Time Frame: Blood collected at baseline and post-intervention for each 1-week dietary period (Sham, Gluten, and Wheat).
|
This outcome was intended to assess changes in pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-8, and IFN-γ) using ex vivo peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) stimulation in a subset of participants.
Blood was collected at baseline and after each 1-week dietary intervention (Sham, Gluten, and Wheat) to isolate PBMCs.
However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the limited clinical phenotype observed, PBMC samples (N=11) were not analyzed.
No outcome data are available.
|
Blood collected at baseline and post-intervention for each 1-week dietary period (Sham, Gluten, and Wheat).
|
|
Long-term Gluten-free Diet Adherence
Time Frame: At least 6-months (up to 41 months) after primary study completion, followed by 1+ months after study result disclosure.
|
At study completion and unblinding, the researchers compiled the study results (ex., worsening in IBS symptoms after gluten challenge) and provided this information to study participants after their study completion. An expert interview-based gluten-free diet assessment used previously in the study was conducted with study participants immediately prior and one month after. This amendment was approved by the Hamilton Ethics Board in June 2022 and was based on participant requests. We used the same gluten-free diet assessment as the primary study. We included new pre- and post-disclosure surveys to ask about current diet habits, beliefs surrounding wheat/gluten sensitivity, and how their behaviours would change after results disclosure. |
At least 6-months (up to 41 months) after primary study completion, followed by 1+ months after study result disclosure.
|
|
Psychological and Gastrointestinal Symptoms After Learning Diet Triggers and Genetic Results (Unblinding Participants to Diet Triggers During Post-study Follow-up)
Time Frame: At least 6-months (up to 41 months) after primary study completion, followed by 1+ months after study result disclosure.
|
At study completion and unblinding, the team compiled the study results (ex., worsening in IBS symptoms after challenges) and provided this information to participants. Previous study surveys were sent to participants immediately prior and 1 month after. We used the following outcomes:
For greater detail, see above secondary outcome measure descriptions. |
At least 6-months (up to 41 months) after primary study completion, followed by 1+ months after study result disclosure.
|
|
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) Symptoms (Continuous)
Time Frame: 1 week purified gluten or whole wheat (gluten+ATIs) intervention versus gluten-free sham. Outcomes were measured at 1 week for Sham, Gluten and Wheat Arm/Groups.
|
Worsening of IBS symptoms (using Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS)) during dietary challenge compared to sham.
The overall score ranges from 0-500 in total, with each of the 5 questions ranging from 0 to 100.
A higher score indicates higher symptom severity and the total score is summed.
An increase in >50 points indicates worsening of symptoms.
|
1 week purified gluten or whole wheat (gluten+ATIs) intervention versus gluten-free sham. Outcomes were measured at 1 week for Sham, Gluten and Wheat Arm/Groups.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Maria Ines Pinto-Sanchez, MD, McMaster University
- Principal Investigator: Premysl Bercik, MD, McMaster University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
- Catassi C, Fabiani E, Iacono G, D'Agate C, Francavilla R, Biagi F, Volta U, Accomando S, Picarelli A, De Vitis I, Pianelli G, Gesuita R, Carle F, Mandolesi A, Bearzi I, Fasano A. A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to establish a safe gluten threshold for patients with celiac disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Jan;85(1):160-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.1.160.
- Bercik P, Denou E, Collins J, Jackson W, Lu J, Jury J, Deng Y, Blennerhassett P, Macri J, McCoy KD, Verdu EF, Collins SM. The intestinal microbiota affect central levels of brain-derived neurotropic factor and behavior in mice. Gastroenterology. 2011 Aug;141(2):599-609, 609.e1-3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.052. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
- Major G, Pritchard S, Murray K, Alappadan JP, Hoad CL, Marciani L, Gowland P, Spiller R. Colon Hypersensitivity to Distension, Rather Than Excessive Gas Production, Produces Carbohydrate-Related Symptoms in Individuals With Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2017 Jan;152(1):124-133.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.09.062. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
- Svedlund J, Sjodin I, Dotevall G. GSRS--a clinical rating scale for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and peptic ulcer disease. Dig Dis Sci. 1988 Feb;33(2):129-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01535722.
- Lammers KM, Lu R, Brownley J, Lu B, Gerard C, Thomas K, Rallabhandi P, Shea-Donohue T, Tamiz A, Alkan S, Netzel-Arnett S, Antalis T, Vogel SN, Fasano A. Gliadin induces an increase in intestinal permeability and zonulin release by binding to the chemokine receptor CXCR3. Gastroenterology. 2008 Jul;135(1):194-204.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.023. Epub 2008 Mar 21.
- Carroccio A, Mansueto P, Iacono G, Soresi M, D'Alcamo A, Cavataio F, Brusca I, Florena AM, Ambrosiano G, Seidita A, Pirrone G, Rini GB. Non-celiac wheat sensitivity diagnosed by double-blind placebo-controlled challenge: exploring a new clinical entity. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;107(12):1898-906; quiz 1907. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.236. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
- Patrick DL, Drossman DA, Frederick IO, DiCesare J, Puder KL. Quality of life in persons with irritable bowel syndrome: development and validation of a new measure. Dig Dis Sci. 1998 Feb;43(2):400-11. doi: 10.1023/a:1018831127942.
- Boivin M. Socioeconomic impact of irritable bowel syndrome in Canada. Can J Gastroenterol. 2001 Oct;15 Suppl B:8B-11B. doi: 10.1155/2001/401309.
- Sanger GJ, Alpers DH. Development of drugs for gastrointestinal motor disorders: translating science to clinical need. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008 Mar;20(3):177-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2008.01084.x.
- Gibson PR, Shepherd SJ. Evidence-based dietary management of functional gastrointestinal symptoms: The FODMAP approach. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Feb;25(2):252-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06149.x.
- McKenzie YA, Alder A, Anderson W, Wills A, Goddard L, Gulia P, Jankovich E, Mutch P, Reeves LB, Singer A, Lomer MC; Gastroenterology Specialist Group of the British Dietetic Association. British Dietetic Association evidence-based guidelines for the dietary management of irritable bowel syndrome in adults. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2012 Jun;25(3):260-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2012.01242.x. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
- Gaesser GA, Angadi SS. Gluten-free diet: imprudent dietary advice for the general population? J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Sep;112(9):1330-1333. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.06.009. No abstract available.
- El-Chammas K, Danner E. Gluten-free diet in nonceliac disease. Nutr Clin Pract. 2011 Jun;26(3):294-9. doi: 10.1177/0884533611405538.
- van Overbeek FM, Uil-Dieterman IG, Mol IW, Kohler-Brands L, Heymans HS, Mulder CJ. The daily gluten intake in relatives of patients with coeliac disease compared with that of the general Dutch population. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997 Nov;9(11):1097-9. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199711000-00013.
- Lebwohl B, Granath F, Ekbom A, Montgomery SM, Murray JA, Rubio-Tapia A, Green PH, Ludvigsson JF. Mucosal healing and mortality in coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Feb;37(3):332-9. doi: 10.1111/apt.12164. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
- Leonard MM, Sapone A, Catassi C, Fasano A. Celiac Disease and Nonceliac Gluten Sensitivity: A Review. JAMA. 2017 Aug 15;318(7):647-656. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.9730.
- Maiuri L, Picarelli A, Boirivant M, Coletta S, Mazzilli MC, De Vincenzi M, Londei M, Auricchio S. Definition of the initial immunologic modifications upon in vitro gliadin challenge in the small intestine of celiac patients. Gastroenterology. 1996 May;110(5):1368-78. doi: 10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8613040.
- Caio G, Volta U, Tovoli F, De Giorgio R. Effect of gluten free diet on immune response to gliadin in patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb 13;14:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-26.
- Ferch CC, Chey WD. Irritable bowel syndrome and gluten sensitivity without celiac disease: separating the wheat from the chaff. Gastroenterology. 2012 Mar;142(3):664-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.01.020. Epub 2012 Jan 24. No abstract available.
- Verdu EF. Editorial: Can gluten contribute to irritable bowel syndrome? Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Mar;106(3):516-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.490.
- Eswaran S, Tack J, Chey WD. Food: the forgotten factor in the irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2011 Mar;40(1):141-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2010.12.012.
- Verdu EF, Huang X, Natividad J, Lu J, Blennerhassett PA, David CS, McKay DM, Murray JA. Gliadin-dependent neuromuscular and epithelial secretory responses in gluten-sensitive HLA-DQ8 transgenic mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2008 Jan;294(1):G217-25. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00225.2007. Epub 2007 Nov 15.
- Biesiekierski JR, Newnham ED, Irving PM, Barrett JS, Haines M, Doecke JD, Shepherd SJ, Muir JG, Gibson PR. Gluten causes gastrointestinal symptoms in subjects without celiac disease: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Mar;106(3):508-14; quiz 515. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.487. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
- Wahnschaffe U, Schulzke JD, Zeitz M, Ullrich R. Predictors of clinical response to gluten-free diet in patients diagnosed with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jul;5(7):844-50; quiz 769. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.03.021. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
- Schuppan D, Pickert G, Ashfaq-Khan M, Zevallos V. Non-celiac wheat sensitivity: differential diagnosis, triggers and implications. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun;29(3):469-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 May 8.
- Zevallos VF, Raker V, Tenzer S, Jimenez-Calvente C, Ashfaq-Khan M, Russel N, Pickert G, Schild H, Steinbrink K, Schuppan D. Nutritional Wheat Amylase-Trypsin Inhibitors Promote Intestinal Inflammation via Activation of Myeloid Cells. Gastroenterology. 2017 Apr;152(5):1100-1113.e12. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
- Wilson B, Whelan K. Prebiotic inulin-type fructans and galacto-oligosaccharides: definition, specificity, function, and application in gastrointestinal disorders. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Mar;32 Suppl 1:64-68. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13700.
- Spiller R. How do FODMAPs work? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Mar;32 Suppl 1:36-39. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13694.
- Junker Y, Zeissig S, Kim SJ, Barisani D, Wieser H, Leffler DA, Zevallos V, Libermann TA, Dillon S, Freitag TL, Kelly CP, Schuppan D. Wheat amylase trypsin inhibitors drive intestinal inflammation via activation of toll-like receptor 4. J Exp Med. 2012 Dec 17;209(13):2395-408. doi: 10.1084/jem.20102660. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
- El-Salhy M, Ostgaard H, Gundersen D, Hatlebakk JG, Hausken T. The role of diet in the pathogenesis and management of irritable bowel syndrome (Review). Int J Mol Med. 2012 May;29(5):723-31. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2012.926. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
- Mitchell CM, Drossman DA. Survey of the AGA membership relating to patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gastroenterology. 1987 May;92(5 Pt 1):1282-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(87)91099-7. No abstract available.
- Pietzak M. Celiac disease, wheat allergy, and gluten sensitivity: when gluten free is not a fad. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012 Jan;36(1 Suppl):68S-75S. doi: 10.1177/0148607111426276.
- Marcason W. Is there evidence to support the claim that a gluten-free diet should be used for weight loss? J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Nov;111(11):1786. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.09.030. No abstract available.
- Higgins JA. Whole grains, legumes, and the subsequent meal effect: implications for blood glucose control and the role of fermentation. J Nutr Metab. 2012;2012:829238. doi: 10.1155/2012/829238. Epub 2011 Oct 30.
- Rosen LA, Ostman EM, Shewry PR, Ward JL, Andersson AA, Piironen V, Lampi AM, Rakszegi M, Bedo Z, Bjorck IM. Postprandial glycemia, insulinemia, and satiety responses in healthy subjects after whole grain rye bread made from different rye varieties. 1. J Agric Food Chem. 2011 Nov 23;59(22):12139-48. doi: 10.1021/jf2019825. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
- Russo F, Riezzo G, Chiloiro M, De Michele G, Chimienti G, Marconi E, D'Attoma B, Linsalata M, Clemente C. Metabolic effects of a diet with inulin-enriched pasta in healthy young volunteers. Curr Pharm Des. 2010;16(7):825-31. doi: 10.2174/138161210790883570.
- Harris KA, Kris-Etherton PM. Effects of whole grains on coronary heart disease risk. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2010 Nov;12(6):368-76. doi: 10.1007/s11883-010-0136-1.
- Kelly G. Inulin-type prebiotics: a review. (Part 2). Altern Med Rev. 2009 Mar;14(1):36-55.
- Abrams SA, Griffin IJ, Hawthorne KM, Liang L, Gunn SK, Darlington G, Ellis KJ. A combination of prebiotic short- and long-chain inulin-type fructans enhances calcium absorption and bone mineralization in young adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Aug;82(2):471-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcn.82.2.471.
- Reddy BR. Noncaloric Benefits of Carbohydrates. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. 2015;82:27-37. doi: 10.1159/000381999. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
- Tarini J, Wolever TM. The fermentable fibre inulin increases postprandial serum short-chain fatty acids and reduces free-fatty acids and ghrelin in healthy subjects. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010 Feb;35(1):9-16. doi: 10.1139/H09-119.
- Neyrinck AM, Delzenne NM. Potential interest of gut microbial changes induced by non-digestible carbohydrates of wheat in the management of obesity and related disorders. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2010 Nov;13(6):722-8. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32833ec3fb.
- Lee A, Newman JM. Celiac diet: its impact on quality of life. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003 Nov;103(11):1533-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2003.08.027.
- Lee AR, Ng DL, Zivin J, Green PH. Economic burden of a gluten-free diet. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2007 Oct;20(5):423-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2007.00763.x.
- Verdu EF, Armstrong D, Murray JA. Between celiac disease and irritable bowel syndrome: the "no man's land" of gluten sensitivity. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jun;104(6):1587-94. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.188.
- Mills EJ, Chan AW, Wu P, Vail A, Guyatt GH, Altman DG. Design, analysis, and presentation of crossover trials. Trials. 2009 Apr 30;10:27. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-27.
- Leffler DA, Dennis M, Edwards George JB, Jamma S, Magge S, Cook EF, Schuppan D, Kelly CP. A simple validated gluten-free diet adherence survey for adults with celiac disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 May;7(5):530-6, 536.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.12.032. Epub 2009 Jan 11.
- Kim ER, Rhee PL. How to interpret a functional or motility test - colon transit study. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Jan;18(1):94-9. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2012.18.1.94. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
- Megiorni F, Mora B, Bonamico M, Nenna R, Di Pierro M, Catassi C, Drago S, Mazzilli MC. A rapid and sensitive method to detect specific human lymphocyte antigen (HLA) class II alleles associated with celiac disease. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46(2):193-6. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2008.049.
- Zar S, Benson MJ, Kumar D. Food-specific serum IgG4 and IgE titers to common food antigens in irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jul;100(7):1550-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41348.x.
- Roalfe AK, Roberts LM, Wilson S. Evaluation of the Birmingham IBS symptom questionnaire. BMC Gastroenterol. 2008 Jul 23;8:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-8-30.
- Adam B, Liebregts T, Holtmann G. [Irritable bowel syndrome]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2005 Feb 25;130(8):399-401. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-863064. German.
- Fennerty MB. Traditional therapies for irritable bowel syndrome: an evidence-based appraisal. Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2003;3 Suppl 2:S18-24.
- Johanson JF. Options for patients with irritable bowel syndrome: contrasting traditional and novel serotonergic therapies. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004 Dec;16(6):701-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2004.00550.x.
- Drossman DA, Patrick DL, Whitehead WE, Toner BB, Diamant NE, Hu Y, Jia H, Bangdiwala SI. Further validation of the IBS-QOL: a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Apr;95(4):999-1007. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01941.x.
- Missbach B, Schwingshackl L, Billmann A, Mystek A, Hickelsberger M, Bauer G, Konig J. Gluten-free food database: the nutritional quality and cost of packaged gluten-free foods. PeerJ. 2015 Oct 22;3:e1337. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1337. eCollection 2015.
- Sapone A, Bai JC, Ciacci C, Dolinsek J, Green PH, Hadjivassiliou M, Kaukinen K, Rostami K, Sanders DS, Schumann M, Ullrich R, Villalta D, Volta U, Catassi C, Fasano A. Spectrum of gluten-related disorders: consensus on new nomenclature and classification. BMC Med. 2012 Feb 7;10:13. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-13.
- Lionetti E, Catassi C. New clues in celiac disease epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and treatment. Int Rev Immunol. 2011 Aug;30(4):219-31. doi: 10.3109/08830185.2011.602443.
- Natividad JM, Huang X, Slack E, Jury J, Sanz Y, David C, Denou E, Yang P, Murray J, McCoy KD, Verdu EF. Host responses to intestinal microbial antigens in gluten-sensitive mice. PLoS One. 2009 Jul 31;4(7):e6472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006472.
- Volta U, Pinto-Sanchez MI, Boschetti E, Caio G, De Giorgio R, Verdu EF. Dietary Triggers in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Is There a Role for Gluten? J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Oct 30;22(4):547-557. doi: 10.5056/jnm16069.
- Hodge A, Patterson AJ, Brown WJ, Ireland P, Giles G. The Anti Cancer Council of Victoria FFQ: relative validity of nutrient intakes compared with weighed food records in young to middle-aged women in a study of iron supplementation. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000 Dec;24(6):576-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2000.tb00520.x.
- Evans RC, Kamm MA, Hinton JM, Lennard-Jones JE. The normal range and a simple diagram for recording whole gut transit time. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992 Feb;7(1):15-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01647654.
- Seiler CL, Rueda GH, Miranda PM, Nardelli A, Borojevic R, Hann A, Rahmani S, De Souza R, Caminero A, Curella V, Neerukonda M, Vanner S, Schuppan D, Moayyedi P, Collins SM, Verdu EF, Pinto-Sanchez MI, Bercik P. Effect of gluten and wheat on symptoms and behaviours in adults with irritable bowel syndrome: a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled crossover trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Sep;10(9):794-805. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00090-1. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Diet in IBS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Irritable Bowel Syndrome
-
NCT04214470WithdrawnIrritable Bowel Syndrome | Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea | Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation | Irritable Bowel Syndrome Characterized by Constipation | Irritable Bowel Syndrome Mixed | Irritable Bowel Syndrome Without Diarrhea | Irritable Bowel | Irritable Bowel Syndrome Aggravated | Irritable Bowel Syndrome Characterised by Alternating Bowel Habit
-
NCT07103772Enrolling by invitationIrritable Bowel Syndrome | Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea | Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation | Irritable Bowel Syndrome Mixed
-
NCT05646186RecruitingIrritable Bowel Syndrome | Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea | Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation | Irritable Bowel Syndrome Mixed
-
NCT06837064Enrolling by invitationIrritable Bowel Syndrome | Irritable Bowel Syndrome - Constipation | Irritable Bowel Syndrome - Diarrhoea | Irritable Bowel Syndrome - Mixed
-
NCT05157061CompletedIrritable Bowel Syndrome | Irritable Bowel Syndrome - Constipation | Irritable Bowel Syndrome - Diarrhoea | Irritable Bowel Syndrome - Mixed
-
NCT04484467CompletedIrritable Bowel Syndrome | Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea | Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation | Irritable Bowel Syndrome Mixed
-
NCT07431957Not yet recruitingChronic Idiopathic Constipation | Chronic Constipation | CIC | Constipation Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome | Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-C)
-
NCT07052890CompletedIrritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) | Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea (IBS-D)
-
NCT07475299Not yet recruitingIrritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
-
NCT06681012RecruitingIrritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) | Irritable Bowel Syndrome of Diarrhea Type (IBS-D)
Clinical Trials on Purified gluten
-
NCT00819819TerminatedCeliac Disease | Infant Nutrition
-
NCT05894746RecruitingDiabetes | Celiac Disease | Metabolic Disease | Autoimmunity
-
NCT01827566UnknownNon Celiac Gluten Sensitivity
-
NCT01719913CompletedMetabolic Diseases | Injury of Gastrointestinal Tract
-
NCT03101410CompletedIntestinal Diseases | Gluten-sensitive
-
NCT05353985Completed
-
NCT04274374RecruitingAnkylosing Spondyloarthritis
-
NCT03869359CompletedIrritable Bowel Syndrome
-
NCT02946827Unknown