Comparison of HF10 Therapy Combined With CMM to CMM Alone in the Treatment of Non-Surgical Refractory Back Pain (NSRBP)
A Multi-Center, Prospective, Pragmatic, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Compare HF10 Therapy to Conventional Medical Management in the Treatment of Non-Surgical Refractory Back Pain
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Redwood City, California, United States, 94065
- Nevro Corp
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- Have been diagnosed with chronic, refractory axial low back pain with a neuropathic component and are not eligible for spine surgery
- Have not had any surgery for back or leg pain, or any surgery resulting in back or leg pain
- Qualifying pain score
- Be on stable pain medications, as determined by the Investigator
- Be willing and capable of giving informed consent
- Be willing and able to comply with study-related requirements, procedures, and visits
- Be capable of subjective evaluation, able to read and understand written questionnaires in the local language and are able to read, understand and sign the written inform consent
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- Have a diagnosed back condition with inflammatory causes of back pain, serious spinal pathology and/or neurological disorders
- Have a medical condition or pain in other area(s), not intended to be treated in this study
- Any diagnosis or known condition that can impact reporting of study outcomes as determined by the Investigator
- Be benefitting within 30 days prior to enrollment from an interventional procedure to treat back and/or leg pain
- Have any addictions as determined by the Investigator
- Have an existing drug pump and/or SCS system or another active implantable device such as a pacemaker
- Have prior experience with neuromodulation devices
- Other general exclusions applicable for SCS devices
- Be involved in an injury claim under current litigation
- Have a pending or approved worker's compensation claim
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: CMM
Conventional Medical Management
|
Conventional Medical Management
|
|
Active Comparator: HF10 + CMM
Addition of HF10 therapy to CMM
|
Conventional Medical Management
Senza 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference between treatment groups in responder rates.
Time Frame: 3 Months
|
Responder is defined as a subject who has at least 50% reduction in pain from Baseline as assessed by a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
|
3 Months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Disability as Measured by Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Percentage of subjects with at least 10 point decrease from Baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score
|
6 months
|
|
Percentage change from baseline in back pain intensity (as assessed by VAS)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
|
Changes in Quality of Life (QOL) as measured by EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
|
It measures the subject's health state as assessed in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each with 5 levels.
In addition there is an EQ VAS which records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale.
The scores on these five dimensions can be presented as a health profile or can be converted to a single number summary called the "index value".
|
6 months
|
|
Global impression of change
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Proportion of subjects reporting "better" or "great deal better" on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire
|
6 months
|
|
Change from baseline in opioid equivalent medication usage in each group
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
|
Neurological assessment
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
|
Assessment of motor, sensory and reflex functions.
Clinicians shall characterize the findings as improved, maintained, or a deficit as compared with baseline status.
|
3, 6 and 12 months
|
|
Incidences of adverse events
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
|
3, 6 and 12 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Observational Outcomes on reduction in pain using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Percentage change in back pain
|
24 months
|
|
Observational Outcomes on disability using Oswestry Disability Index scores
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Percentage change from Baseline in ODI score
|
24 months
|
|
Observational Outcomes on Health related quality of life evaluation as measured by the 5 dimension EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Change in quality of life index compared to baseline
|
24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: David Caraway, MD, Nevro Corp
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- O'Connell NE, Ferraro MC, Gibson W, Rice AS, Vase L, Coyle D, Eccleston C. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 2;12(12):CD013756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013756.pub2.
- Patel N, Calodney A, Kapural L, Province-Azalde R, Lad SP, Pilitsis J, Wu C, Cherry T, Subbaroyan J, Gliner B, Caraway D. High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Nonsurgical Refractory Back Pain: Design of a Pragmatic, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Pract. 2021 Feb;21(2):171-183. doi: 10.1111/papr.12945. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CA2018-2 US NSRBP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.