Robotic Versus Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
Robotic Versus Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy for Carcinoma Esophagus: a Prospective Comparative Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Shankar Balasubramanian
- Phone Number: +919910766534
- Email: shanxar@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Tamil Nadu
-
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
- Recruiting
- GEM Hospital & Research Center
-
Contact:
- Bhushan Chittawadagi, MS, DNB
-
Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, 641045
- Recruiting
- GEM Hospital & Research Center
-
Contact:
- Shankar Balasubramanian
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Resectable esophageal carcinoma, either squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma in the middle or lower part the esophagus
Exclusion Criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 4 and above
- Esophagectomy for other non-malignant conditions
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Robotic esophagectomy
Esophagectomy performed for esophageal cancer using the da Vinci robotic surgical system
|
Removal of the esophagus and its draining lymph nodes using robotic surgical instruments
|
|
Active Comparator: Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy
Esophagectomy performed for esophageal cancer using conventional thoracoscopic and laparoscopic techniques
|
Removal of the esophagus and its draining lymph nodes using conventional thoracoscopic and laparoscopic techniques
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Lymph node yield
Time Frame: 7 days after Index Surgery
|
Total number of lymph nodes harvested
|
7 days after Index Surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical margin status
Time Frame: 7 days after Index Surgery
|
The proximal, distal and circumferential surgical margins will be assessed by pathological evaluation for the presence of tumor and will be assigned an "R" category as defined by the College of American Pathologists.
R0 would indicate no evidence of residual tumor.
Presence of microscopic tumor at margins would be designated as R1 whereas the presence of macroscopically visible tumor at margins would be designated as R2.
|
7 days after Index Surgery
|
|
Complications
Time Frame: Up to 90 days after surgery
|
Intraoperative and post operative adverse events assessed by Clavien Dindo classification system
|
Up to 90 days after surgery
|
|
ICU stay
Time Frame: During index admission or within 30 days after surgery
|
Duration of stay in ICU following surgery
|
During index admission or within 30 days after surgery
|
|
Hospital stay
Time Frame: During index admission or re admission within 30 days
|
Length of stay in hospital following surgery
|
During index admission or re admission within 30 days
|
|
Mortality
Time Frame: During index admission or within 90 days following surgery
|
Death following surgery
|
During index admission or within 90 days following surgery
|
|
Duration of surgery
Time Frame: 1 day after surgery
|
Time taken to complete the surgical procedure recorded in minutes
|
1 day after surgery
|
|
Blood loss
Time Frame: During surgery and up to 24 hours after index surgery
|
Amount of blood lost during and within 24 hours of surgery
|
During surgery and up to 24 hours after index surgery
|
|
Conversion rate
Time Frame: 1 day after surgery
|
Need for conversion of the procedure to open or other alternate technique
|
1 day after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Chinnusamy Palanivelu, MS, MCh, GEM Hospital & Research Center
- Study Director: Shankar Balasubramanian, MS, MRCS, GEM Hospital & Research Center
- Study Director: Sandeep Sabnis, MS, DNB, GEM Hospital & Research Center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- GEMBOT
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.