Efficacy and Toxicity of Blinatumomab in the French ATU for Adult BCP-ALL R/R, or With MRD+ (FRENCH-CYTO) (FRENCH-CYTO)

February 26, 2026 updated by: Group for Research in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Efficacy and Toxicity of Blinatumomab in the French Compassionate Use Program (ATU) for Adult Patients With B-cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (BCP-ALL) Refractory, in Relapse, or With Positive Minimal Residual Disease.

The outcome of young adults (18-60 years) with ALL has been dramatically improved by the use of pediatric-inspired trials. About 60% of these young adult patients will be cured at 5 years. In this context, early evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) at complete remission has been shown to be one of the most powerful prognostic factor, but also predictive of the benefit of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Despite this global improvement, about 30% of patients experience a relapse and will be exposed to be refractory to salvage therapy or to early disease escape. In adult ALL, the most important prognostic factors at relapse are : the time from first CR to relapse, the achievement of a second complete remission (CR), and the feasibility of ASCT.

Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager that recruits T-cell on CD19 positive blast cells and induces anti-leukemic cytotoxicity. In a phase 3 trial in relapse/refractory Philadelphia-negative (Ph-) ALL, 43% of patients achieved a CR or CR with partial hematological recovery (CRh), with the majority of responses occurring within the first cycle. In patients with positive MRD (MRD+) BCP-ALL, blinatumomab resulted in complete MRD response in 78% of patients after one cycle.

Between 2012 and 2016, blinatumomab was available in France for R/R and MRD+ ALL adult patients through the French Compassionate Use Program. About 92 adult ALL were treated at different stages of the disease in 27 centers.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

To evaluate the efficacy of blinatumomab given in the French Compassionate Use Program, in term of overall survival in both R/R (first cohort) and MRD positive (second cohort) patients.

To evaluate the efficacy of blinatumomab given in the French Compassionate Use Program, in term of CR/CRH in R/R patients, To evaluate the efficacy in term of molecular response in both R/R and MRD+ cohorts, To evaluate the efficacy of blinatumomab given in the French Compassionate Use Program, in both Ph+/Ph- ALL patients To evaluate the feasibility and the safety of blinatumomab administration in a multi-center setting.To evaluate the feasibility of allogeneic stem cell transplant after blinatumomab administration in both populations.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
92

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • France
      • Paris, France, 75010
        • CABANNES-HAMY Aurélie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients aged 18y+ with R/R or MRD+ BCP-ALL treated in the French GRAALL Network

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patient with Philadelphia-negative or positive (Ph+) ALL in relapse, refractory to salvage therapy, or with MRD positive ALL that received blinatumomab in the French ATU program.,

  • Patient treated in the GRAALL network,
  • Patient who does'nt object to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria :

- none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Relapse/Refractory
MRD positive

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival in R/R and MRD+ cohorts
Time Frame: 6 months
Months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response rates
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent
6 months
Adverse events
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent
6 months
Disease free survival
Time Frame: 6 months
Months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Group for Research in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Amgen

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Nicolas BOISSEL, MD, 142499643

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 16, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 20, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 26, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FRENCH-CYTO

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, in Relapse

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings