N-Acetyl-L-Leucine for Ataxia-Telangiectasia (A-T)
Effects of N-Acetyl-L-Leucine on Ataxia-Telangiectasia (A-T): A Multinational, Multicenter, Open-label, Rater-blinded Phase II Study
This is a multinational, multicenter, open-label, rater-blinded prospective Phase II study which will assess the safety and efficacy of N-Acetyl-L-Leucine (IB1001) for the treatment of Ataxia-Telangiectasia (A-T).
There are two phases to this study: the Parent Study, and the Extension Phase.
The Parent Study evaluates the safety and efficacy of N-Acetyl-L-Leucine (IB1001) for the symptomatic treatment of A-T.
The Extension Phase evaluates the long-term safety and efficacy of IB1001 for the neuroprotective, disease-modifying treatment of A-T.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The primary purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of N-Acetyl-L-Leucine (IB1001) in the treatment of A-T investigating the efficacy in terms of improving symptoms, functioning, and quality of life against the defined endpoints in patients with A-T.
Patients will be assessed during three study phases: a baseline period, a 6-week treatment period, and a 6-week post-treatment washout period. If within 6 weeks prior to the initial screening visit, a patient has received any of the prohibited medications defined in the eligibility criteria (irrespective of the preceding treatment duration) a wash-out study-run in of 6 weeks is required prior to the first baseline assessment.
All patients will receive the study drug during this study.
For each individual patient, the study lasts for approximately 3.5 - 4 months during which there are 6 study visits to the study site.
This Extension Phase allows patients who have completed the Parent Study to, at the discretion of the Principal Investigator (PI), continue treatment with N-Acetyl-L-Leucine (IB1001). Patients will receive treatment with IB1001 for two one-year treatment periods, separated by a 6-week washout. All patients will receive the study drug during the treatment period. For each individual patient, the Extension Phase lasts for approximately 25.5 months, during which there are 6 visits to the study site.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Michael Strupp, MD
- Phone Number: +44 8081 641283
- Email: mstrupp@intrabio.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Taylor Fields, MSt
- Phone Number: +44 8081 641283
- Email: tfields@intrabio.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Giessen, Germany
- University of Gießen
-
-
-
-
Spain
-
Madrid, Spain, Spain
- Hospital Universitario La Paz
-
-
-
-
Cambridgeshire
-
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom, CB2 0AY
- Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
-
-
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
- University of California - Los Angeles
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria
Individuals who meet all of the following criteria are eligible to participate in the study:
- Written informed consent signed by the patient and/or their legal representative/ parent
- Male or female aged ≥6 years with a confirmed diagnosis of A-T at the time of signing informed consent.
Females of childbearing potential, defined as a premenopausal female capable of becoming pregnant, will be included if they are either sexually inactive (sexually abstinent for 14 days prior to the first dose continuing through 28 days after the last dose) or using one of the following highly effective contraceptives (i.e. results in <1% failure rate when used consistently and correctly) 14 days prior to the first dose continuing through 28 days after the last dose:
- intrauterine device (IUD);
- surgical sterilization of the partner (vasectomy for 6 months minimum);
- combined (estrogen or progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with the inhibition of ovulation (either oral, intravaginal, or transdermal);
- progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with the inhibition of ovulation (either oral, injectable, or implantable);
- intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS);
- bilateral tubal occlusion.
Females of non-childbearing potential must have undergone one of the following sterilization procedures at least 6 months prior to the first dose:
- hysteroscopic sterilization;
- bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy;
- hysterectomy;
- bilateral oophorectomy;
OR
be postmenopausal with amenorrhea for at least 1 year prior to the first dose and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) serum levels consistent with postmenopausal status. FSH analysis for postmenopausal women will be done at screening. FSH levels should be in the postmenopausal range as determined by the central laboratory.
- Non-vasectomized male patient agrees to use a condom with spermicide or abstain from sexual intercourse during the study until 90 days beyond the last dose of study medication and the female partner agrees to comply with inclusion criteria 3 or 4. For a vasectomized male who has had his vasectomy 6 months or more prior to study start, it is required that they use a condom during sexual intercourse. A male who has been vasectomized less than 6 months prior to study start must follow the same restrictions as a non-vasectomized male.
- If male, the patient agrees not to donate sperm from the first dose until 90 days after dosing.
Patients must fall within:
a) A Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA) score of 5 ≤ X ≤ 33 points (out of 40) AND i. Within the 2-7 range (out of 0-8 range) of the Gait subtest of the SARA scale OR ii. Be able to perform the 9 Hole Peg Test with Dominant Hand (9HPT-D) (SCAFI subtest) in 20 ≤ X ≤150 seconds.
- Weight ≥15 kg at screening.
Patients are willing to disclose their existing medications/therapies for (the symptoms) of A-T, including those on the prohibited medication list. Non-prohibited medications/therapies (e.g. concomitant speech therapy, and physiotherapy) are permitted provided:
- The Investigator does not believe the medication/therapy will interfere with the study protocol/results
- Patients have been on a stable dose/duration and type of therapy for at least 6 weeks before Visit 1 (Baseline 1)
- Patients are willing to maintain a stable dose/do not change their therapy throughout the duration of the study.
- An understanding of the implications of study participation, provided in the written patient information and informed consent by patients or their legal representative/parent, and demonstrates a willingness to comply with instructions and attend required study visits (for children this criterion will also be assessed in parents or appointed guardians).
Exclusion Criteria
Individuals who meet any of the following criteria are not eligible to participate in the study:
- Asymptomatic patients
- Patient has clinical features of A-T, but a completely negative result on a previous genetic test for A-T.
Patients who have any of the following:
- Chronic diarrhea;
- Unexplained visual loss;
- Malignancies;
- Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
- Known history of hypersensitivity to the N-Acetyl-Leucine (DL-, L-, D-) or derivatives.
- History of known hypersensitivity to excipients of Ora-Blend® (namely sucrose, sorbitol, cellulose, carboxymethylcellulose, xanthan gum, carrageenan, dimethicone, methylparaben, and potassium sorbate).
- Simultaneous participation in another clinical study or participation in any clinical study involving administration of an investigational medicinal product (IMP; 'study drug') within 6 weeks prior to Visit 1.
- Patients with a physical or psychiatric condition which, at the investigator's discretion, may put the patient at risk, may confound the study results, or may interfere with the patient's participation in the clinical study.
Known clinically-significant (at the discretion of the investigator) laboratories in hematology, coagulation, clinical chemistry, or urinalysis, including, but not limited to:
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >5x upper limit of normal (ULN);
- Total bilirubin >1.5x ULN, unless Gilbert's syndrome is present in which case total bilirubin >2x ULN.
- Known or persistent use, misuse, or dependency of medication, drugs, or alcohol.
- Current or planned pregnancy or women who are breastfeeding.
- Patients with severe vision or hearing impairment (that is not corrected by glasses or hearing aids) that, at the investigator's discretion, interferes with their ability to perform study assessments.
- Patients who have been diagnosed with arthritis or other musculoskeletal disorders affecting joints, muscles, ligaments, and/or nerves that by themselves affects patient's mobility and, at the investigator's discretion, interferes with their ability to perform study assessments.
Patients unwilling and/or not able to undergo a 6-week washout period from any of the following prohibited medication prior to Visit 1 (Baseline 1) and remain without prohibited medication through Visit 6.
- Aminopyridines (including sustained-release form);
- N-Acetyl-DL-Leucine (e.g. Tanganil®);
- N-Acetyl-L-Leucine (prohibited if not provided as IMP);
- Riluzole;
- Gabapentin;
- Varenicline;
- Chlorzoxazone;
- Sulfasalazine;
- Rosuvastatin.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Treatment with IB1001
6-weeks treatment with IB1001 administered orally. Patients ≥13 years old will receive a total daily dose of 4 g/day (administered as 3 doses per day). Patients 6-12 years old will receive weight-tiered doses:
After the 6-week treatment period, patients will enter a 6-week post-treatment washout period. |
IB1001 (N-Acetyl-L-Leucine) is a modified amino-acid ester that is orally administered.
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Post-Treatment Washout
After the 6-week treatment period, patients will enter a 6-week post-treatment washout period.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Impression of Change in Severity (CI-CS) [Fields et al. 2021]
Time Frame: CI-CS comparing Baseline (Day 1) with IB1001 versus the end of 6-weeks treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42) MINUS the CI-CS comparing the end of 6-weeks treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42) versus the end of 6-weeks post-treatment washout
|
The Clinical Impression of Change in Severity assessment will instruct the blinded rater to consider: compared to the first video, how has the severity of their performance on the 9 Hole Peg Test of the Dominant Hand (9HPT-D) or 8 Meter Walk Test (8MWT) changed (improved or worsened) in 6-weeks as observed in the second video? The Clinical Impression of Change in Severity is evaluated on a 7 point Likert scale (+3=significantly improved to -3= significantly worse). Change values were calculated for each period, i.e. treatment with IB1001 (comparing the end of treatment (Visit 4) with baseline (Visit 2)) and post-treatment washout (comparing the end of washout (Visit 6) with the end of treatment (Visit 4)). Then, the mean change obtained in the post-treatment period was subtracted from the mean change obtained for the treatment with IB1001 period, with a positive value indicating an improvement in the treatment period compared to the post-treatment washout period. |
CI-CS comparing Baseline (Day 1) with IB1001 versus the end of 6-weeks treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42) MINUS the CI-CS comparing the end of 6-weeks treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42) versus the end of 6-weeks post-treatment washout
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Key Secondary Endpoint: Change in Severity Based on Average CI-S
Time Frame: (CI-S comparing baseline period [average for Visit 1 and 2] and end of treatment period [average for Visit 3 and 4]) MINUS (change in CI-S between end of treatment period [average for Visit 3 and 4] and end of washout period [average for Visit 5 and 6])
|
The Change in Severity assessment will instruct the blinded rater to consider the severity of the patient at each visit. The Clinical Impression of Severity (CI-S)-assessment ranged from +3 ="normal not ill at all" to -3="among the most extremely ill patients ". Change values were calculated for each period, i.e. treatment with IB1001 (change between the baseline period [average for Visit 1 and Visit 2] and end of treatment period [average for Visit 3 and Visit 4]) and post-treatment washout (between end of treatment period [average for Visit 3 and Visit 4] and end of washout period [average for Visit 5 and Visit 6]). Then, the mean change in the post-treatment period was subtracted from the mean change in the treatment with IB1001 period. |
(CI-S comparing baseline period [average for Visit 1 and 2] and end of treatment period [average for Visit 3 and 4]) MINUS (change in CI-S between end of treatment period [average for Visit 3 and 4] and end of washout period [average for Visit 5 and 6])
|
|
Secondary Efficacy Endpoint: Individual Components of CI-CS
Time Frame: Baseline to end of treatment with IB1001 (Parent Study 6-weeks treatment); End of treatment with IB1001 to the end of post 6-week treatment washout.
|
The Clinical Impression of Change in Severity assessment will instruct the blinded rater to consider: compared to the first video, how has the severity of their performance on the 9 Hole Peg Test of the Dominant Hand (9HPT-D) or 8 Meter Walk Test (8MWT) changed (improved or worsened) in 6-weeks as observed in the second video? The Clinical Impression of Change in Severity is evaluated on a 7 point Likert scale (+3=significantly improved to -3= significantly worse). Change values were calculated for each period, i.e. treatment with IB1001 (comparing the end of treatment (Visit 4) with baseline (Visit 2)) and post-treatment washout (comparing the end of washout (Visit 6) with the end of treatment (Visit 4)). |
Baseline to end of treatment with IB1001 (Parent Study 6-weeks treatment); End of treatment with IB1001 to the end of post 6-week treatment washout.
|
|
Secondary Efficacy Endpoint: CI-CS Score Reclassified on a 3-Point Scale
Time Frame: Baseline to end of treatment with IB1001 (Parent Study 6-weeks treatment); End of treatment with IB1001 to the end of post 6-week treatment washout
|
The Clinical Impression of Change in Severity assessment will instruct the blinded rater to consider: compared to the first video, how has the severity of their performance on the 9 Hole Peg Test of the Dominant Hand (9HPT-D) or 8 Meter Walk Test (8MWT) changed (improved or worsened) in 6-weeks as observed in the second video? The Clinical Impression of Change in Severity is evaluated on a 7 point Likert scale (+3=significantly improved to -3= significantly worse). CI-CS scores <0 were reclassified as worsened (-1), CI-CS scores 0 remained classified as not changed (0), and CI-CS scores >0 were reclassified as improved (+1). When comparing Visit 4 versus Visit 2 and Visit 6 versus Visit 4, CI-CS scores <0 were reclassified as worsened (-1), CI-CS scores 0 remained classified as not changed (0), and CI-CS scores >0 were reclassified as improved (+1). |
Baseline to end of treatment with IB1001 (Parent Study 6-weeks treatment); End of treatment with IB1001 to the end of post 6-week treatment washout
|
|
Secondary Efficacy Endpoint: CI-CS Score for the Non-Primary Anchor Test
Time Frame: CI-CS of the non-primary anchor test was evaluated, comparing the CI-CS of Visit 4 (end of treatment) versus Visit 2 (baseline) and of Visit 6 (end of washout) versus Visit 4 (end of treatment) as done for the primary anchor test.
|
The Clinical Impression of Change in Severity assessment will instruct the blinded rater to consider: compared to the first video, how has the severity of their performance on the 9 Hole Peg Test of the Dominant Hand (9HPT-D) or 8 Meter Walk Test (8MWT) changed (improved or worsened) in 6-weeks as observed in the second video? The Clinical Impression of Change in Severity is evaluated on a 7 point Likert scale (+3=significantly improved to -3= significantly worse). Change values were calculated for each period, i.e. treatment with IB1001 (comparing the end of treatment (Visit 4) with baseline (Visit 2)) and post-treatment washout (comparing the end of washout (Visit 6) with the end of treatment (Visit 4)). |
CI-CS of the non-primary anchor test was evaluated, comparing the CI-CS of Visit 4 (end of treatment) versus Visit 2 (baseline) and of Visit 6 (end of washout) versus Visit 4 (end of treatment) as done for the primary anchor test.
|
|
Secondary Efficacy Endpoint: Change in the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) Score [Schmitz-Hübsch Etal, 2006; Subramony, 2007]
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to end of treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42); End of treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42) to the end of post-treatment washout (Approximately Day 84)
|
The Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia has 8 items that are related to gait, stance, sitting, speech, finger-chase test, nose-finger test, fast alternating movements, and heel-shin test. The range is 0-40 points, with a lower score representing neurological improvement and a higher score representing neurological worsening. Change values were calculated for each period, i.e. treatment with IB1001 (comparing the end of treatment (Visit 4) with baseline (Visit 2)) and post-treatment washout (comparing the end of washout (Visit 6) with the end of treatment (Visit 4)). |
Baseline (Day 1) to end of treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42); End of treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42) to the end of post-treatment washout (Approximately Day 84)
|
|
Secondary Efficacy Endpoint: Spinocerebellar Ataxia Functional Index (SCAFI) [Schmitz-Hübsch et al, 2008]
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to end of treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42); End of treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42) to the end of post-treatment washout (Approximately Day 84)
|
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Functional Index (SCAFI) is composed of 8 Meter Walk Test, 9-Hole Peg Test of Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand (9HPT-D/9HPT-ND) (the 3 tests are timed assessments; each is done twice and values are averaged; the 8MWT and 9HPT-D and 9HPT-ND values are converted from times to rates, and the results expressed as a composite Z-score of each test relative to baseline) and the PATA rate (counted number how often a patient can repeat the syllables "PATA" within 10 seconds), a measure of speech performance.
The scores of these 3 were transformed to Z-scores (=individual's average of both trials to perform the respective task -mean of study population at baseline) / SD of study population at baseline).
A Z-score of 0 equates to the population mean at baseline.
For all 3, higher Z-scores (above mean) mean better performance.
The SCAFI total score was calculated as the arithmetic mean of the non-missing Z-scores for the 3.
A higher total score means better performance.
|
Baseline (Day 1) to end of treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42); End of treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42) to the end of post-treatment washout (Approximately Day 84)
|
|
Secondary Efficacy Endpoint: EuroQuol- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Quality of Life Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to end of treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42); End of treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42) to the end of post-treatment washout (Approximately Day 84)
|
For posting, health-related quality of life based on the EQ-5D visual analogue scale (VAS) was presented as a secondary endpoint. EQ-5D VAS is a 0-100 scale where patients are asked to indicate their overall health, with a score of 0 indicating worst health and a score of 100 indicating best health. |
Baseline (Day 1) to end of treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42); End of treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42) to the end of post-treatment washout (Approximately Day 84)
|
|
Secondary Efficacy Endpoint: Clinical Global Impression of Severity (Treating Physician, Caregiver, Patient)
Time Frame: Visits of Parent study: Visit 1 (Day -14), Visit 2 (Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 28), Visit 4 (Day 42), Visit 5 (Day 70), and Visit 6 (Day 84).
|
The Clinical Global Impression of Severity(CGI-S) evaluates the question "Considering your total (clinical) experience with this particular population, how ill is the patient (how ill are you) at this time?"
based on answers from the treating physician, the caregiver, or the patients (if able).
This was rated on the following seven-point scale: 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill the patient has been/I have ever been.
|
Visits of Parent study: Visit 1 (Day -14), Visit 2 (Day 1), Visit 3 (Day 28), Visit 4 (Day 42), Visit 5 (Day 70), and Visit 6 (Day 84).
|
|
Secondary Efficacy Endpoint: Clinical Global Impression of Change (Treating Physician, Caregiver, Patient)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to end of treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42); End of treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42) to the end of post-treatment washout (Approximately Day 84)
|
The Clinical Global Impression of Change assessed by the investigator is evaluated on a 7 point Likert scale ranging from 1='very much improved' to 7='very much worse' Change values were calculated for each period, i.e. treatment with IB1001 (comparing the end of treatment (Visit 4) with baseline (Visit 2)) and post-treatment washout (comparing the end of washout (Visit 6) with the end of treatment (Visit 4)).
|
Baseline (Day 1) to end of treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42); End of treatment with IB1001 (Approximately Day 42) to the end of post-treatment washout (Approximately Day 84)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Churchill GC, Strupp M, Factor C, Bremova-Ertl T, Factor M, Patterson MC, Platt FM, Galione A. Acetylation turns leucine into a drug by membrane transporter switching. Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 4;11(1):15812. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95255-5.
- Fields T, Patterson M, Bremova-Ertl T, Belcher G, Billington I, Churchill GC, Davis W, Evans W, Flint S, Galione A, Granzer U, Greenfield J, Karl R, Kay R, Lewi D, Mathieson T, Meyer T, Pangonis D, Platt FM, Tsang L, Verburg C, Factor M, Strupp M. A master protocol to investigate a novel therapy acetyl-L-leucine for three ultra-rare neurodegenerative diseases: Niemann-Pick type C, the GM2 gangliosidoses, and ataxia telangiectasia. Trials. 2021 Jan 22;22(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-05009-3.
- Brueggemann A, Bicvic A, Goeldlin M, Kalla R, Kerkeni H, Mantokoudis G, Abegg M, Kolnikova M, Mohaupt M, Bremova-Ertl T. Effects of Acetyl-DL-Leucine on Ataxia and Downbeat-Nystagmus in Six Patients With Ataxia Telangiectasia. J Child Neurol. 2022 Jan;37(1):20-27. doi: 10.1177/08830738211028394. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Brain Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Genetic Diseases, Inborn
- Metabolic Diseases
- Immune System Diseases
- Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes
- Neurocutaneous Syndromes
- Dyskinesias
- DNA Repair-Deficiency Disorders
- Cerebellar Diseases
- Cerebellar Ataxia
- Spinocerebellar Ataxias
- Ataxia
- Telangiectasis
- Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
- Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases
- Ataxia Telangiectasia
- acetylleucine
- IB1001
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IB1001-203
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ataxia Telangiectasia
-
NCT04887311Not yet recruitingAtaxia Telangiectasia | Ataxia Telangiectasia Louis-Bar | Ataxia Telangiectasia in Children
-
NCT06673056Active, not recruitingAtaxia-Telangiectasia | Ataxia-Telangiectasia (A-T)
-
NCT02246491TerminatedAtaxia-Telangiectasia (A-T)
-
NCT02733679CompletedAtaxia-Telangiectasia
-
NCT00187057CompletedAtaxia-Telangiectasia
-
NCT00656409CompletedAtaxia Telangiectasia (AT)
-
NCT07380165AvailableAtaxia-Telangiectasia (A-T)
-
NCT05692622RecruitingAtaxia Telangiectasia | Ataxia Telangiectasia in Children
-
NCT05531890Active, not recruiting
-
NCT04870866Active, not recruitingAtaxia Telangiectasia
Clinical Trials on IB1001
-
NCT00768287Completed
-
NCT03855280Completed
-
NCT01271868Terminated
-
NCT02048111Withdrawn
-
NCT03759639CompletedNiemann-Pick Disease, Type C
-
NCT03759665CompletedGM2 Gangliosidosis | Tay-Sachs Disease | Sandhoff Disease
-
NCT05163288RecruitingNiemann-Pick Disease, Type C
-
NCT06673056Active, not recruitingAtaxia-Telangiectasia | Ataxia-Telangiectasia (A-T)