Efficacy and Safety of Thermic Devices in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Karim Mohamed-Noriega, M.D.
- Phone Number: +52 8183469259
- Email: karim.mohamednrg@uanl.edu.mx,drkmohamed1@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Nuevo León
-
Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico, 64460
- Departamento de Oftalmologia, Hospital Universitario "Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez"
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients diagnosed with:
- Dry eye syndrome with meibomian gland dysfunction alone or in combination of other type of dry eye.
- Patients who were previously treated with eyelid massages and warm compresses without any improvement.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women.
- History of ocular surgery within three months prior to inclusion.
- History of trauma, infection or inflammation within three months prior to inclusion.
- Contact lens use in the last week before inclusion.
- Patients with active ocular allergic disease.
- Patient with microbial keratitis.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Mibo Thermoflo (thermal device)
Same at-home TheraPearl® regimen plus eyelid massage, and received three additional in-office MiBo Thermoflo® sessions at baseline and weeks 2 and 4. Each eye was treated at 42°C for 11 minutes.
Previously prescribed dry eye disease treatments were maintained unchanged throughout follow-up.
|
Thermal therapy with Mibo Thermoflo for 11 minutes per eye, during each session.
|
|
Active Comparator: Warm compresses and eyelid massage
TheraPearl® gel-bead eye mask over closed eyelids for 11 minutes twice daily, followed by eyelid massage.
Previously prescribed dry eye disease treatments were maintained unchanged throughout follow-up.
|
Warm compresses plus eyelid massage 2 times per day 11 minutes per eye.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Meibomian gland expressibility
Time Frame: Basal to 24 weeks
|
Changes in meibomian gland structure will be evaluated by meibomian gland expressibility.
|
Basal to 24 weeks
|
|
Meibum quality
Time Frame: Basal to 24 weeks
|
Changes in meibomian gland structure will be evaluated with the meibum quality in slit lamp graded as: clear, opaque, granular and toothpaste for meibum worst secretion.
|
Basal to 24 weeks
|
|
Corneal and conjunctival staining with fluorescein dye
Time Frame: Basal to 24 weeks
|
Ocular surface damage will be graded with corneal and conjunctival staining with fluorescein dye.
|
Basal to 24 weeks
|
|
Corneal and conjunctival staining with lissamine green dye
Time Frame: Basal to 24 weeks
|
Ocular surface damage will be graded with corneal and conjunctival staining with lissamine green dye.
|
Basal to 24 weeks
|
|
Tear Break-up Time (TBUT)
Time Frame: Basal to 24 weeks
|
Tear stability will be measured with Tear Break-up Time (TBUT).
A result >10 seconds will be considered normal, a result <10 seconds will be considered pathological.
|
Basal to 24 weeks
|
|
Schirmer test with and without anesthesia
Time Frame: Basal to 24 weeks
|
Tear production will be measured by Schirmer test with and without anesthesia.
A Schirmer test >10 mm will be considered normal, a result >5 mm pathological.
The Schirmer test with anesthesia >15 mm is consider normal.
|
Basal to 24 weeks
|
|
Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye questionnaire (SANDE)
Time Frame: Basal to 24 weeks
|
Ocular surface symptoms will be assessed by the Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) questionnaire.
The SANDE questionnaire has two questions presented in a visual scale.
The two questions assess the frequency and severity of dry eye symptoms.
|
Basal to 24 weeks
|
|
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
Time Frame: Basal to 24 weeks
|
Ocular surface symptoms will be assessed by the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI).
The OSDI questionnaire consists of 12 questions that assess dry eye symptoms and their effects on vision related function.
The questionnaire is divided in 3 subscales: ocular symptoms, vision-related function, and environmental triggers.
Patients are asked to rate their responses on a 0 to 4 scale where 0 represents "none of the time", 1 "some of the time", 2 "half of the time", 3 "most of the time", and 4 "all of the time".
The total score is calculated using the following formula: ([sum of scores for all questions answered x 100] / [total number of questions answered x 4]).
Lower scores represent a better outcome.
|
Basal to 24 weeks
|
|
Dry Eye Questionnaire 5 (DEQ-5)
Time Frame: Basal to 24 weeks
|
Ocular surface symptoms will be assessed by the Dry Eye Questionnaire 5 (DEQ-5).
The Dry Eye Questionnaire 5 asses habitual dry eye symptoms (discomfort, dryness and wetty eyes) and severity level.
|
Basal to 24 weeks
|
|
Tear osmolarity
Time Frame: Basal to 24 weeks
|
Patients with dry eye have increased levels of tear osmolarity wich is one of tear inflammation biomarkers.
Tear osmolarity will be performed with Tear Lab Osmolarity System, a result of 308 mOsm/L or higher indicates dry eye disease.
|
Basal to 24 weeks
|
|
Change in tear of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9)
Time Frame: Basal to 24 weeks
|
MMP-9 is an inflammatory biomarker wich is elevated in the tears of patients with dry eye and an early diagnostic evaluation, it is realized in consulting room with the InflammaDry test (Rapid Pathogen Screening Inc.).
The presence of 1 line is a negative result and two lines means positive result.
|
Basal to 24 weeks
|
|
Non-Invasive Keratograph Break-up Time (NIKBUT)
Time Frame: Basal to 24 weeks
|
NIKBUT will be measured with Keratograph 5M.
A JENVIS Dry Eye report will be generated to document findings.
|
Basal to 24 weeks
|
|
Tear meniscus height
Time Frame: Basal to 24 weeks
|
Tear meniscus height will be measured with Keratograph 5M.
A JENVIS Dry Eye report will be generated to document findings.
|
Basal to 24 weeks
|
|
Conjuctival hyperemia
Time Frame: Basal to 24 weeks
|
Conjuctival hypermeia will be graded with JENVIS Scale performed by Keratograph 5M.
A JENVIS Dry Eye report will be generated to document findings.
Conjuctival hyperemia will be .
graded as: none, mild moderate or severe.
|
Basal to 24 weeks
|
|
Lipid layer thickness
Time Frame: Basal to 24 weeks
|
Lipid layer thickness will be measured with Keratograph 5M.
A JENVIS Dry Eye report will be generated to document findings.
|
Basal to 24 weeks
|
|
Adverse events
Time Frame: Basal to 24 weeks
|
Adverse events will be evaluated during the ophthalmic evaluation.
|
Basal to 24 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Short term changes with corneal and conjunctival staining with fluorescein dye
Time Frame: These parameters will be evaluated before sessions of termal therapy at week 2 and week 4
|
Short term changes in ocular surface damage will be graded with corneal and conjunctival staining with fluorescein dye.
|
These parameters will be evaluated before sessions of termal therapy at week 2 and week 4
|
|
Short term changes with corneal and conjunctival staining with lissamine green dye
Time Frame: These parameters will be evaluated before sessions of termal therapy at week 2 and week 4
|
Short term changes in ocular surface damage will be graded with corneal and conjunctival staining with lissamine green dye.
|
These parameters will be evaluated before sessions of termal therapy at week 2 and week 4
|
|
Short term changes in tear stability
Time Frame: These parameterd will be evaluated before sessions of termal therapy at week 2 and week 4
|
Short term changes in tear stability will be measured with Tear Break-up Time (TBUT).
A result >10 seconds will be considered normal, a result <10 seconds will be considered pathological.
|
These parameterd will be evaluated before sessions of termal therapy at week 2 and week 4
|
|
Short term changes in Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye questionnaire (SANDE)
Time Frame: These parameters will be evaluated before sessions of termal therapy at week 2 and week 4
|
Short term changes in ocular surface symptoms will be assessed by the Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE).
The SANDE questionnaire has two questions presented in a visual scale.
The two questions assess the frequency and severity of dry eye symptoms.
A less rate prove changes in ocular surface symptoms and quality of life improvement.
|
These parameters will be evaluated before sessions of termal therapy at week 2 and week 4
|
|
Short term changes in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
Time Frame: These parameters will be evaluated before sessions of termal therapy at week 2 and week 4
|
Short term changes in ocular surface symptoms will be assessed by the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI).
The OSDI questionnaire consists of 12 questions that assess dry eye symptoms and their effects on vision related function.
The questionnaire is divided in 3 subscales: ocular symptoms, vision-related function, and environmental triggers..
A less rate prove changes in ocular surface symptoms and quality of life improvement.
|
These parameters will be evaluated before sessions of termal therapy at week 2 and week 4
|
|
Short term changes in Dry Eye Questionnaire 5 (DEQ-5)
Time Frame: These parameters will be evaluated before sessions of termal therapy at week 2 and week 4
|
Short term changes in ocular surface symptoms will be assessed by the Dry Eye Questionnaire 5 (DEQ-5).
The Dry Eye Questionnaire 5 asses habitual dry eye symptoms (discomfort, dryness and wetty eyes) and severity level.
A less rate prove changes in coular surface symptoms and quality of life improvement.
|
These parameters will be evaluated before sessions of termal therapy at week 2 and week 4
|
|
Eyelid skin temperature
Time Frame: These parameters will be evaluated before sessions of termal therapy at week 2 and week 4
|
Eyelid skin temperature will be measured with the thermographic infrared scientific equipment FLIR SC4000 to verify if 42 celsius degree are obtain as maker recommends.
|
These parameters will be evaluated before sessions of termal therapy at week 2 and week 4
|
|
Corneal conjunctival temperature
Time Frame: These parameters will be evaluated before sessions of termal therapy at week 2 and week 4
|
Corneal conjunctival temperature will be measured with the thermographic infrared scientific equipment FLIR SC4000 to verify if 42 celsius degree are obtain as maker recommends.
|
These parameters will be evaluated before sessions of termal therapy at week 2 and week 4
|
|
Bulbar conjunctival temperature
Time Frame: These parameters will be evaluated before sessions of termal therapy at week 2 and week 4
|
Bulbar conjunctival temperature will be measured with the thermographic infrrared scientific equipment FLIR SC4000 to verify if 42 celsius degree are obtain as maker recommends.
|
These parameters will be evaluated before sessions of termal therapy at week 2 and week 4
|
|
Tarsal conjunctival temperature
Time Frame: These parameters will be evaluated before sessions of thermal therapy at week 2 and week 4.
|
Tarsal conjunctival temperature will be measured with the thermographic infrared scientific equipment FLIR SC4000 to verify if 42 celsius degree are obtain as maker recommends.
|
These parameters will be evaluated before sessions of thermal therapy at week 2 and week 4.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Karim Mohamed-Noriega, M.D., Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. Gonzalez
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Geerling G, Tauber J, Baudouin C, Goto E, Matsumoto Y, O'Brien T, Rolando M, Tsubota K, Nichols KK. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on management and treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 30;52(4):2050-64. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997g. No abstract available.
- Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, Caffery B, Dua HS, Joo CK, Liu Z, Nelson JD, Nichols JJ, Tsubota K, Stapleton F. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
- Jones L, Downie LE, Korb D, Benitez-Del-Castillo JM, Dana R, Deng SX, Dong PN, Geerling G, Hida RY, Liu Y, Seo KY, Tauber J, Wakamatsu TH, Xu J, Wolffsohn JS, Craig JP. TFOS DEWS II Management and Therapy Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):575-628. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
- Lemp MA, Crews LA, Bron AJ, Foulks GN, Sullivan BD. Distribution of aqueous-deficient and evaporative dry eye in a clinic-based patient cohort: a retrospective study. Cornea. 2012 May;31(5):472-8. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318225415a.
- Schaumberg DA, Nichols JJ, Papas EB, Tong L, Uchino M, Nichols KK. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on the epidemiology of, and associated risk factors for, MGD. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 30;52(4):1994-2005. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997e. Print 2011 Mar. No abstract available.
- Arita R, Morishige N, Shirakawa R, Sato Y, Amano S. Effects of Eyelid Warming Devices on Tear Film Parameters in Normal Subjects and Patients with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Ocul Surf. 2015 Oct;13(4):321-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 May 30.
- Foulks, G. N., Lemp, M., Jester, J., Sutphin, J., Murube, J., & Novack, G. (2007). report of the international dry eye workshop (DEWS). Ocul Surf, 5(2), 65-204. Foulks, G. N., Lemp, M., Jester, J., Sutphin, J., Murube, J., & Novack, G. (2007). Report of the international dry eye workshop (DEWS). Ocul Surf, 5(2), 65-204.
- Hom M, De Land P. Prevalence and severity of symptomatic dry eyes in Hispanics. Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Mar;82(3):206-8. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000156310.45736.fa.
- Johnson ME, Murphy PJ. Changes in the tear film and ocular surface from dry eye syndrome. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2004 Jul;23(4):449-74. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.04.003.
- Kenrick CJ, Alloo SS. The Limitation of Applying Heat to the External Lid Surface: A Case of Recalcitrant Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan 16;8(1):7-12. doi: 10.1159/000455087. eCollection 2017 Jan-Apr.
- Mori A, Shimazaki J, Shimmura S, Fujishima H, Oguchi Y, Tsubota K. Disposable eyelid-warming device for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2003 Nov-Dec;47(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/s0021-5155(03)00142-4.
- Nelson JD, Shimazaki J, Benitez-del-Castillo JM, Craig JP, McCulley JP, Den S, Foulks GN. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the definition and classification subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 30;52(4):1930-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997b. Print 2011 Mar. No abstract available.
- Pult H, Riede-Pult BH, Purslow C. A comparison of an eyelid-warming device to traditional compress therapy. Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Jul;89(7):E1035-41. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31825c3479.
- Qiao J, Yan X. Emerging treatment options for meibomian gland dysfunction. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1797-803. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S33182. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
- Wang MT, Jaitley Z, Lord SM, Craig JP. Comparison of Self-applied Heat Therapy for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Sep;92(9):e321-6. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000601.
- Wang X, Lu X, Yang J, Wei R, Yang L, Zhao S, Wang X. Evaluation of Dry Eye and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Teenagers with Myopia through Noninvasive Keratograph. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:6761206. doi: 10.1155/2016/6761206. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
- Stetson G. & Kenrick Ch. (2018). A comparision of four warm compress devices. The Association of Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO). Honolulu Hawaii. 953-B0131.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- OF18-00006
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.